Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I've noticed a new trend. It seems a significant portion of the community doctors are now giving out Abilify 5mg like its candy.
Why? Well the only justification I can think of is the ad blitz for the antidepression augmentation. However I've seen some psychiatrists give it where no depression augmentation was needed.
Some examples....
Hmm--pt has PTSD The treating psychiatrist put the pt on on Zoloft 100mg and Abilify 5mg. Why augment the Zoloft when the maximum dose was not yet reached and the patient has no side effects? No, there is no MDD with or without psychotic features. The person has an anxiety disorder. Its a anti-depression augmentation agent, not an anti-anxiety augmentation agent as far as I'm aware.
Borderline patient is given Abilify 5mg even though they're not put on anything else. Hmm--what a great augmentation agent, Abilify 5mg and there's nothing there for it to augment.
What about the other augmentation agents that were put through STAR*D? Buspirone is only $4 a month, it has plenty of data to support it as an antidepression and antianxiety augmentation agent, and it won't require a psychiatrist to now expensive draw labs on the patient that are the standard for antipsychotics.
Yes I can justifiably see someone being put on Abilify 5 mg if they truly needed the antidepression augmentation, and the antidepressant has reached the maximum dose, but why not use one of the cheaper and safer meds? Anything show Abilify as superior to Buspirone?
I can justifiably see someone putting someone on Abilify 5mg if that person had MDD with psychotic features because a low dose antipsychotic in that case is justified, though I've yet to see any other doctor do it for that reason out of the several Abilify 5mg cases I've seen. (And in that case, you really can just put them on a low dose of Risperdal which is becoming ever cheaper).
Anyone else seeing this trend?
Why? Well the only justification I can think of is the ad blitz for the antidepression augmentation. However I've seen some psychiatrists give it where no depression augmentation was needed.
Some examples....
Hmm--pt has PTSD The treating psychiatrist put the pt on on Zoloft 100mg and Abilify 5mg. Why augment the Zoloft when the maximum dose was not yet reached and the patient has no side effects? No, there is no MDD with or without psychotic features. The person has an anxiety disorder. Its a anti-depression augmentation agent, not an anti-anxiety augmentation agent as far as I'm aware.
Borderline patient is given Abilify 5mg even though they're not put on anything else. Hmm--what a great augmentation agent, Abilify 5mg and there's nothing there for it to augment.
What about the other augmentation agents that were put through STAR*D? Buspirone is only $4 a month, it has plenty of data to support it as an antidepression and antianxiety augmentation agent, and it won't require a psychiatrist to now expensive draw labs on the patient that are the standard for antipsychotics.
Yes I can justifiably see someone being put on Abilify 5 mg if they truly needed the antidepression augmentation, and the antidepressant has reached the maximum dose, but why not use one of the cheaper and safer meds? Anything show Abilify as superior to Buspirone?
I can justifiably see someone putting someone on Abilify 5mg if that person had MDD with psychotic features because a low dose antipsychotic in that case is justified, though I've yet to see any other doctor do it for that reason out of the several Abilify 5mg cases I've seen. (And in that case, you really can just put them on a low dose of Risperdal which is becoming ever cheaper).
Anyone else seeing this trend?