Adcoms of SDN, what is the highest number of publications you've seen from a premed

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted1077948
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Adcoms of SDN, what is the highest number of publications you've seen from a premed? What would you say is the top 10th percentile at your school?
IMO: Cannot generalize, but among advises and applicants, having 1 peer reviewed article in any authorship position gets you in the top 10 percentile for that activity. BUT it does not make you a top 10 percentile applicant.
 
Last edited:
Some applicants have done PhDs and apply with a dozen or more publications. Applicants come from all kinds of backgrounds so I don't think the number alone tells the whole story.
 
Quality > quantity

1 publication in nature, cell, or science >> 5 publications in mid.
An authorship in C/N/S can be still given for political reasons. A first author paper in such journals is extremely rare and something to be taken seriously but i don’t see anyone outside of PhDs applying to MDs doing this
 
First author anywhere is great. I don't agree that quality always trumps quantity, though. While it's true that double-blind studies and clinical trials are more impressive than poster presentations and reviews, a publication is a publication and something to be proud of. I don't think the name of the journal/publishing entity matters too much, either. But as a pre-med, in exchange for getting the opportunity to do research, you're probably not gonna be first author. In the end research is meaningful for some, but for most pre-meds it's something they're not as enthusiastic about compared to clinical activities, and this is usually a good thing.
tldr; any research is a good thing but research is required for some med schools and not others
 
Top