• AMA with Certified Student Loan Professional

    Join SDN on December 7th at 6:00 PM Eastern as we host Andrew Paulson of StudentLoanAdvice.com for an AMA webinar. He'll be answering your questions about how to best manage your student loans. Register now!

Advantage?

MuDPhuDShane

Junior Member
10+ Year Member
Jul 18, 2006
15
0
  1. Medical Student
    I am an MD/PhD student and am certain I want to pursue rad onc... How much of an advantage does having a PhD confer in terms of matching for a residency?

    My doctoral resesarch will be in tumor biology, but not necessarily rad onc. I may have time to pick up a smaller auxilary project with one of my school's radiobiologists during my research phase--is this necessary? In other words, is rad onc research valued significantly more than just onc research?
     

    Gfunk6

    And to think . . . I hesitated
    Moderator Emeritus
    Lifetime Donor
    Verified Expert
    15+ Year Member
    Apr 16, 2004
    4,175
    2,972
    SF Bay Area
    1. Attending Physician
      A PhD is a huge advantage. If you look at the list of those who matched this year (look for the RadOnc directory thread below), you'll see that ~26% of were MD/PhD. No field has a % of PhDs this high.

      Rad Onc research > Onc research > other basic research >> clinical projects, in general.

      Radiobiology work is highly valued, if you can pick up a project and publish a basic paper that would be huge. If your publications are high caliber (e.g. Cancer Res, PNAS, Oncogene) or truly ground-breaking (e.g. Cell, Science, Nature) then the kind of research you do matters less, though you should at least be able to apply an oncologic spin to it.
       

      Thaiger75

      Senior Member
      10+ Year Member
      15+ Year Member
      Nov 3, 2003
      345
      0
        And let me add that yes, it is highly valued...for academic programs (ie. Chicago, Michigan, MDACC, etc). For those programs that are primarily clinic-oriented...not so much.
         
        About the Ads

        Gfunk6

        And to think . . . I hesitated
        Moderator Emeritus
        Lifetime Donor
        Verified Expert
        15+ Year Member
        Apr 16, 2004
        4,175
        2,972
        SF Bay Area
        1. Attending Physician
          Though I respect Thaiger greatly, let me offer a slightly differing opinion. Please keep in mind that this is only the experience of one applicant, but . . .

          I was invited to interview at a lot of programs that are not academic powerhouses and, in fact, were not prepared to give me substantive time during residency for bench research endeavors. This led to some seriously awkward moments during interviews which made me wonder why they extended me an interview invitation in the first place.

          My point is that given how competitive things have become, a PhD (to quote SimulD) has become a proxy for academic success and/or a "supposed" predictor of future academic potential. Even the smaller RadOnc programs would like to produce graduates that go into academics and pursue clinical research to expand/improve the field.

          As a side note, I was pretty unequivocal in my personal statement that I wanted to do basic research in addition to seeing patients. Personally, I don't believe I misled programs re: my intentions.
           

          libaobao8

          Junior Member
          10+ Year Member
          5+ Year Member
          Nov 17, 2005
          10
          0
          1. Medical Student
            Gfunk6 said:
            A PhD is a huge advantage. If you look at the list of those who matched this year (look for the RadOnc directory thread below), you'll see that ~26% of were MD/PhD. No field has a % of PhDs this high.


            26% MD/PHD is impressive. I suspect that Rad Onc applicant pool may have a higher % MD/PhD as well. It'll be interesting to see the diffenence between % MD/PHD applied and % matched.
             
            About the Ads
            This thread is more than 15 years old.

            Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

            1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
            2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
            3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
            4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
            5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
            6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
            7. This thread is locked.