AIRP

Started by choa06
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Ehh. They are not bad for board information but not tailored to it. I watched a good number of the lectures but did a little picking and choosing based on topics I wanted to know more about. Generally high quality lectures, at least.
Agree. The lectures are actually really good, I learned a lot. But way too dense for boards. MSK lectures I did think were really good overall though. The others were more hit or miss but too much detail for studying - I would advise the same as above, pick and choose your weak points.
 
I paid minimal attention when I attended AIRP and passed core without issues. But maybe I would have been a better radiologist if I paid attention :/
 
Month long vacation for me, passed boards with flying colors. Agree that MSK section stands out amongst the rest.
 
You'd think for a course as popular as AIRP, they would have a competitive process to ensure the quality of lectures/lecturers. Nah. Some are good, some are bad, and overall it is just above average. Some of the cases are from the film days and their lectures haven't been updated since.