so I'll be interviewing at Albert Einstein in February and I'm really grateful at the opportunity but at the same time I'm wondering....are they really seriously considering me? Here's why I ask that question....
At some schools (ie. UCI) getting to the interview stage gives you a legitimate 50% chance of getting in. I looked up MSAR's information about Albert Einstein (AECOM) and for the 2001-2002 entering class, they interviewed 1280 people for a class of 180. Now "usually" schools acccept more people than what their class size actually is. You all know why, so I don't have to explain that one. So I was thinking, ok let's say that AECOM accepts DOUBLE it's class size (give and take a few) so that would make 360 acceptances out of 1280 that interview.....meaning a 28% chance of getting in. So now I'm wondering is 28% good enough? Now if we look at how many applications (primary) AECOM gets (almost 6000), then getting an interview and ultimately an acceptance sure makes you feel special ( 360/6000 = 6% chance of getting accepted).
Now, this is not taking into account when the interview is...if you interview late, obviously your chances of getting in will be a little lower due to rolling admissions....
I know there are people out there who have interviewed at Einstein, has the Dean of Admissions or anyone there discussed why they interview so many applicants? what are the chances of getting in post-interview? What is AECOM looking for in their applicants?
I'm one of those sub-30 applicants (24-25 MCATs) with an ok undergrad science GPA (3.3) and a strong Postbac GPA 3.8. I believe my letters of rec are strong and so are my extra curriculars.....but according to the MSAR, AECOM's averages for acceptances are 3.6 GPA and 31 MCAT......
So do I really have shot at getting in or are they just Bsing me?
I was trying to analyze the situation and then I thought, ok, maybe Einstein looks only at POST BAC GPAs after a certain amount of units (Cornell does this for sure: I called them last year and explained my situation with them and Cornell told me that if I finish 25 semester units of post bac work, THEY WILL ONLY CONSIDER MY POST BAC GPA instead of undergrad GPA for their screening process ....kind of cool for those of us who for whatever reason didn't perform up to our potential during undergrad right?) So back to my AECOM analysis. So if that's the case for my GPA...then I'm definitely above average in GPA for AECOM, but below average in their MCAT...maybe one balances the other out 😕
Now I know that there is more than just numbers in the application process...but come on guys for real....THIS IS MY THIRD YEAR APPLYING TO MEDICAL SCHOOL and I can tell you from experience that although it is true, NUMBERS ARE NOT EVERYTHING
IT IS THE NUMBERS THAT OPEN DOORS FOR YOU,,,,THEN THE REST OF YOUR FILE CAN SHINE (LETTERS OF REC, PERSONAL STATEMENT, EXTRA CURRICULARS, CLINICAL, RESEARCH EXPERIENCE, ETC)
it is because of the above statement and my commitment to primary care that I also decided to apply to DO schools, because I feel that there are just way too many schools (allopathic) that rely too much on numbers to see the "quality" of an applicant.....and then let's not even talk about how much socio-political bullsh-t goes on in the admissions process for MD schools (ie who's considered URM, who's not, why not? affirmative action, etc, etc).
Well, I know this is a long one, probably one of the longest messages I have ever written here on SDN, but if I can have your input as to what you guys think of Einstein's admissions process or if there are any Einstein students out there that can talk about their school I will really appreciate it, thanks.
At some schools (ie. UCI) getting to the interview stage gives you a legitimate 50% chance of getting in. I looked up MSAR's information about Albert Einstein (AECOM) and for the 2001-2002 entering class, they interviewed 1280 people for a class of 180. Now "usually" schools acccept more people than what their class size actually is. You all know why, so I don't have to explain that one. So I was thinking, ok let's say that AECOM accepts DOUBLE it's class size (give and take a few) so that would make 360 acceptances out of 1280 that interview.....meaning a 28% chance of getting in. So now I'm wondering is 28% good enough? Now if we look at how many applications (primary) AECOM gets (almost 6000), then getting an interview and ultimately an acceptance sure makes you feel special ( 360/6000 = 6% chance of getting accepted).
Now, this is not taking into account when the interview is...if you interview late, obviously your chances of getting in will be a little lower due to rolling admissions....
I know there are people out there who have interviewed at Einstein, has the Dean of Admissions or anyone there discussed why they interview so many applicants? what are the chances of getting in post-interview? What is AECOM looking for in their applicants?
I'm one of those sub-30 applicants (24-25 MCATs) with an ok undergrad science GPA (3.3) and a strong Postbac GPA 3.8. I believe my letters of rec are strong and so are my extra curriculars.....but according to the MSAR, AECOM's averages for acceptances are 3.6 GPA and 31 MCAT......
So do I really have shot at getting in or are they just Bsing me?
I was trying to analyze the situation and then I thought, ok, maybe Einstein looks only at POST BAC GPAs after a certain amount of units (Cornell does this for sure: I called them last year and explained my situation with them and Cornell told me that if I finish 25 semester units of post bac work, THEY WILL ONLY CONSIDER MY POST BAC GPA instead of undergrad GPA for their screening process ....kind of cool for those of us who for whatever reason didn't perform up to our potential during undergrad right?) So back to my AECOM analysis. So if that's the case for my GPA...then I'm definitely above average in GPA for AECOM, but below average in their MCAT...maybe one balances the other out 😕
Now I know that there is more than just numbers in the application process...but come on guys for real....THIS IS MY THIRD YEAR APPLYING TO MEDICAL SCHOOL and I can tell you from experience that although it is true, NUMBERS ARE NOT EVERYTHING
IT IS THE NUMBERS THAT OPEN DOORS FOR YOU,,,,THEN THE REST OF YOUR FILE CAN SHINE (LETTERS OF REC, PERSONAL STATEMENT, EXTRA CURRICULARS, CLINICAL, RESEARCH EXPERIENCE, ETC)
it is because of the above statement and my commitment to primary care that I also decided to apply to DO schools, because I feel that there are just way too many schools (allopathic) that rely too much on numbers to see the "quality" of an applicant.....and then let's not even talk about how much socio-political bullsh-t goes on in the admissions process for MD schools (ie who's considered URM, who's not, why not? affirmative action, etc, etc).
Well, I know this is a long one, probably one of the longest messages I have ever written here on SDN, but if I can have your input as to what you guys think of Einstein's admissions process or if there are any Einstein students out there that can talk about their school I will really appreciate it, thanks.