I did a quick search but didn't turn up anything obvious, so here goes.
I'm an M1 at a school that has a policy that exams are for assessment purposes only. This means that after an exam has been taken, the class is not given an opportunity to see what the answers to an exam are (tests are taken online). We are given our score, the mean, sd, median, and histogram of class scores- so we know where we stand. Some exams will list problem areas from the questions you got wrong (for example, off an anatomy exam, one question's problem area for me was "Innervation." Not sure how valuable this info is- I think it's mostly useless).
Now, I am definitely not a grade grubber, never have been. However, I like to use exam answers as a learning tool- it helps keep me from reinforcing an incorrect ideas (I might think it's right because that's the answer I picked), and not only helps me better understand material, it's also useful in seeing which kinds of questions typically trip me up. All useful in long term boards prep in my opinion.
From my understanding, test questions are re-used from year to year, and the school does not want to compromise these questions for students next year. Understandable, but to me it conveys a lack of trust in the integrity of their students. Drama, I know.
I'm curious to find out if other schools have this policy or something similar, and what other people think?
Also, I'd like to approach the dean with a logical, well thought-out request to reconsider this policy. In an ideal world, I'd like to find some kind of educational literature supporting the idea that reviewing exam questions and answers after the test support long-term learning. Any suggestions?
I'm an M1 at a school that has a policy that exams are for assessment purposes only. This means that after an exam has been taken, the class is not given an opportunity to see what the answers to an exam are (tests are taken online). We are given our score, the mean, sd, median, and histogram of class scores- so we know where we stand. Some exams will list problem areas from the questions you got wrong (for example, off an anatomy exam, one question's problem area for me was "Innervation." Not sure how valuable this info is- I think it's mostly useless).
Now, I am definitely not a grade grubber, never have been. However, I like to use exam answers as a learning tool- it helps keep me from reinforcing an incorrect ideas (I might think it's right because that's the answer I picked), and not only helps me better understand material, it's also useful in seeing which kinds of questions typically trip me up. All useful in long term boards prep in my opinion.
From my understanding, test questions are re-used from year to year, and the school does not want to compromise these questions for students next year. Understandable, but to me it conveys a lack of trust in the integrity of their students. Drama, I know.
I'm curious to find out if other schools have this policy or something similar, and what other people think?
Also, I'd like to approach the dean with a logical, well thought-out request to reconsider this policy. In an ideal world, I'd like to find some kind of educational literature supporting the idea that reviewing exam questions and answers after the test support long-term learning. Any suggestions?