There are so many threads on SDN that extol the long term benefits of prestige. One recurring theme is that a prestigious medical school paves the way to a prestigious residency, that somehow the reputation of a school can actually make it EASIER to earn a spot at such a residency.
I'm just wondering if this whole line of reasoning is fundamentally flawed. For one thing, the individuals who attend top med schools tend to be very smart, and therefore they tend to achieve high scores on step 1, which (from what I understand) is an important criterion for residency placement. But grades during the preclinical years and evaluations during the clerkships are equally important, right? Given the unusually high proportion of very smart people at top med schools, wouldn't it be HARDER to earn excellent marks at such schools? If grades and evals are important criteria in the Match, then it seems to me that students at top schools would be at a slight disadvantage relative to med students at less selective med schools.
Am I crazy?
I'm just wondering if this whole line of reasoning is fundamentally flawed. For one thing, the individuals who attend top med schools tend to be very smart, and therefore they tend to achieve high scores on step 1, which (from what I understand) is an important criterion for residency placement. But grades during the preclinical years and evaluations during the clerkships are equally important, right? Given the unusually high proportion of very smart people at top med schools, wouldn't it be HARDER to earn excellent marks at such schools? If grades and evals are important criteria in the Match, then it seems to me that students at top schools would be at a slight disadvantage relative to med students at less selective med schools.
Am I crazy?