AMA: 3-year study of NPs in the ED: Worse outcomes, higher costs

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

TheLoneWolf

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
805
Reaction score
1,081

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8 users
While this shows NPs may not be good for the VA or Kaiser EDs, the “nonprofit” hospitals might have a different takeaway.

Do private hospitals make more money when they increase admissions, tests, and procedures?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
I wonder how often hospitals see rejected claims from insurance due to “lack of medical necessity.”
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Hmm shocking! Put sub par people in charge and expect better and cheaper care, Walmart healthcare!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
DFF503BB-7251-4294-94EE-213DFA30ED4D.png
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
Who would have guessed that people
With less training provide inferior care.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users
Well their argument is that they are "good enough". Nobody with more than 5 brain cells would believe the care is the same.

No. Their argument is that they provide equivalent care. That the education and training differences don’t matter. There is no evidence to the contrary. Or what little evidence exists is insufficient and biased.

That is their argument. An argument that hospital administrators really want to buy into. They just lack enough cover.

Never mind that for 40+ years thst everyone who could afford to pay up for a physician did so. The economic pressures have never been greater which is why they are gaining.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
They are winning because the loudest voices and biggest whiners win in this political arena. No one will call them out on their false virtue signaling because of the bad optics. It will take lots of bad outcomes and publicity before some whistleblowing happens.

No. Their argument is that they provide equivalent care. That the education and training differences don’t matter. There is no evidence to the contrary. Or what little evidence exists is insufficient and biased.

That is their argument. An argument that hospital administrators really want to buy into. They just lack enough cover.

Never mind that for 40+ years thst everyone who could afford to pay up for a physician did so. The economic pressures have never been greater which is why they are gaining.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
"ENA has concerns about the study's methodology...but we are not going to share what those concerns are. Just trust us that we definitely have concerns, plus, nurses care for the entire patient in a holistic way that only nurses can do."
...could have just let it go and not said anything and no one would have been the wiser....some folks just can't help kicking turds.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
"ENA has concerns about the study's methodology...but we are not going to share what those concerns are. Just trust us that we definitely have concerns, plus, nurses care for the entire patient in a holistic way that only nurses can do."

Their "concern" with the study is that the outcome wasn't what they wanted.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Who would have guessed that people
With less training provide inferior care.
Amazing that many NPs get their "training" entirely online. That also includes CRNAs moving from their MSN to DNaP.
 
Top