An interesting legal case

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

RoachUSMLE

Pathological pathologist
10+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
24
Reaction score
11

"In reversing its homicide ruling, the Medical Examiner’s Office relied heavily on what it said were the findings of an outside neuropathologist, Lucy Rorke-Adams, who allegedly determined Greenberg’s spinal cord wasn’t damaged by the wounds to the back of her neck, which would have allowed her to inflict the subsequent wounds on herself, including the final plunge to her chest.

But nobody has ever been able to produce that neuropathology report, or an invoice for it, and Rorke-Adams previously told The Inquirer that she had no recollection of the case."
 
Happy to see the Harris ticket won’t be weighed down by this loser.
 
I don't know the full details of the investigation or the totality of the exam findings, but Undetermined is a very valid MOD if circumstances appear squirrely.
 
Top