Hhhhmmm. If I choose a non-surgical career in medicine, I wouldn't be affiliated w/ the "eye" and that's what I'm interested in. Strabismus surgery? Eh...I guess I'll never know until I try it. I just don't think I'd enjoy doing surgery in such a small, confined area. But like they say, you never know until you try.
Here is the thread I posted in the optometry forum...I'm still confused on how to reach my goal, and my goal is better stated in the thread. I hope you can shed some light:
Title: O.D./Ph.D.??
Is anyone familiar with a Ph.D. in Vision Science? What would I do if I didn't have the O.D. part attached to my name? What would I do if I did have the O.D. part attached to my name? Basically, my goal is to work w/ pediatric vision: pediatric eye diseases, cancer (I'm really interested in retinoblastoma), retina, strabismus and all sorts of other cool stuff that affects the vision of kids, BUT I don't like refracting, VT or fitting contact lenses (which, pretty much takes me out of the running for an O.D. right?) Basically, I want to be presented w/ a bunch of symptoms so I can diagnose and come up w/ a treatment plan.
I'm posting this in the O.D. forum b/c I'm not that interested in the surgical aspect of ophthalmology. The ophth's said I didn't have to be a surgical ophth but I feel like that would be a waste of 4-5yrs of an ophth residency if I didn't do surgery when I was finished. So, I'm just checking other avenues to make the best decision...
Anyway, I just wanted to know if I had a Ph.D. in Vision Science, would I still be able to "look" at the research patients (i.e. using BIO, slit lamp, etc.) or would I be the person all the information is given to...and gathered by someone else? I'm confused on how to get to my goal: O.D.? O.D./Ph.D.? Ph.D.? or M.D.? 😕😕😕
EDIT: Equipment of interest: Along w/ the BIO and slit lamp...Topography, pachy, GDX, OCT, etc.