ALTorGT said:
Hi
any comments on comparing careers in the two fields. I was always interested in surg and anaesthesia. But if you can't be stuffed with the lifestyle in surg, thought rad onc might be a good option. assuming theyre all equally as competitive, what are the pros and cons of choosing anaes over rad onc. (the interest factor is the same. critical care phys pharm is great as is playing with cool radiobiology and technology to zap tumors).
one negative about rad onc to me was the fact that its not as broadly applicable or as mobile as being an anaesthetist.
Heres a somewhat rhetorical reply.
And please take this to heart, cuz its true.
ANYTHING ten years into your career,
any career will become repetitious and somewhat boring, if you are the outgoing type. After the stress of med school/residency/fellowship, you'll go into private practice. With rare exception, your life/aspirations will broaden beyond your job. Your kids will make you yearn for more time at home. You'll gravitate to something non-medical that makes you feel like you were a kid again, opening christmas presents....maybe its airplanes....superbikes....seeing who can put up the biggest snowboard roostertail....no-limit-hold'em...
yes, its important to not
hate what you do, and its important to
like what you do. But most individuals, despite all the neurons they lost selecting their specialty when in med school, could function in a variety of specialties, and be perfectly happy, ten years down the road.
I'll be honest with you. And this won't reflect on me in a positive fashion to alot of readers. But its honest.
I'm not the philinthropic type. I'm not a Mother Theresa analogue. I didnt go into medicine because I wanted to save the world. And I say that to differentiate myself from the true philanthropists out there. I'm inferior to you, humanistically speaking, Dude/Dudette Philanthropist.
Yes, I enjoy taking care of patients. Yes, I enjoy the challenges of clinical medicine.
But I can say something now, that I couldnt say when I was applying to med school/anesthesia residency.
I selected my path for personal gain. Job security. Guaranteed income potential. Knowing once I got licensed as a physician, I'd be able to make X amount, just about anywhere in our country.
Does that make me less of a physician?
I'm deft at what I do. I'm HMFIC of our department. I make decisions that affect many people besides myself. I hire people. Fire people. Direct people. Commend people. Reprimand people.
And our department is thriving under my lead.
But if I hit the powerball tomorrow, I'd give it all up. And in my spare time I'd open up a clinic for the indigent, modeling after the
Camellus House , an indigent care facility in Miami, started by a philanthropic hepatology fellow at U of M when I was there.
If money was no object, I'd focus my direction to where our country needs it the most...providing medical care to the people who cant afford it.
But sorry, slap back to reality. Money doesnt make you happy. Thats up to you-and-yours to work the happiness thing out.
Lets be real here...if money isnt an issue in your life, you are given the gracious opportunity to make decisions free of monetary constraint.
And certain medical specialties can provide that to you.
Lets see...I'm an MS 4 and I owe 178k in student loans (I didnt pick that number out of the air, by the way)....sorry, I'm not gonna go into a specialty that pays less than the CRNAs that I work with make.
Thanks to my professional decisions, I dont have to worry about money. Am I jet-plane-rich? Absolutely not. Medicine doesnt provide jet-plane-richness.
Did my "foresight" as an MS4 provide me and my family with financial security fifteen years later?
Absolutely.
And before they start, I'll accept the "superficial flames" with style. I respect you for calling me out for whatever reason.
But theres no other website on the planet that you'll see
honesty like this.