Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Did anyone read through this latest: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...es-into-whats-possible-this-one-jumps-all-in/
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Anesthesiologist replacement?
Started by mdachipadachi
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
"Just like flying an airplane" is the right description of what intraoperative anesthesia management is, and no one will ever agree to be a passenger on an airplane where the autopilot is actually the only pilot.
These guys are wasting their creativity on the wrong goal, they should instead focus on finding an ideal medication or technology that provide complete anesthesia of pain stimuli without interfering with other physiological functions and as result does not require constant monitoring.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
D
deleted171991
This is not a danger to most anesthesiologists, but to CRNAs. Machines like this will probably end up being supervised by nurses (or even just techs) in the long-term.
This IS the future. It's just a question of when, not if.
The Google self-driving cars have just logged 1 million accident-free miles. Once self-driving cars become the norm, people will be way more relaxed about robotic anything. It's well-known that a human makes more mistakes than a machine (plus tons of other advantages). 😉
Last edited by a moderator:
"Flying is for droids." Obi-Wan Kenobi
