Absolutely. Some interviewers are very persuasive when they decide to go to bat for an applicant.
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Another Adcom, ask me (almost) anything
Started by hushcom
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Absolutely. Some interviewers are very persuasive when they decide to go to bat for an applicant.
@hushcom any advice on how to get off wait lists?
Not in my experience, but never say never. The rule of "be nice or be anonymous" probably applies here.
I sometimes read personal statements that basically go "I started down the path to medicine for bad reasons, but then I learned the true meaning of Christmas and now my intentions are pure gold." While I appreciate the candor, it does not necessarily cast the applicant in the best light. I do, however, think it's possible to highlight your personal evolution in a positive manner and without being deceitful.
See post #24.
It's about personal comfort level. No one ever asked about it in my interviews but if they would have I would have outed myself. I just didn't feel comfortable bringing it up. Coming out is always difficult and interviews are high pressure situations as it is without dropping a bomb on the whole thing.
Depends on who the interviewers are and why the alleged bombing occurred. Some committee members are very generous and want to accept a large proportion of the people they interview, others are much more selective. Some are definitely more skilled at teasing out useful information than others. I find the LORs are often helpful when the interview impressions are incomplete or conflicting.
I would be concerned that they might think I am still somewhat closeted and therefore it might represent some immaturity. Obviously if they detected that I was uncomfortable talking about it, they wouldn't ask about it. Thoughts?
I think it depends on the feel of the room and the school. If it's a religious school I wouldn't touch the topic with a 10 foot pole. In my interview for the school I'm attending I brought up LGBTQ issues without explicitly stating my orientation.
I disagree that closeted equals immaturity. There are a lot of factors at play of why someone is not out.
I disagree that closeted equals immaturity. There are a lot of factors at play of why someone is not out.
But don't most people have good LORs that sing their praises? Can you elaborate a bit on what a useful LOR would look like? Thanks again!
Absolutely. But I think that it's a lot easier for you (us) to understand that than someone who does not think about it all the time. People tend to simplify things.
True that. Hopefully applicants in the future won't even have to consider such things
👍
How do adcoms feel about previously undocumented students?
If I were a DREAMer (undocumented student) until recently is there a way to talk about this without possibly running someone the wrong way, I know it is still a pretty touchy subject.
Freshman year GPA was around 3.1 and had no research/volunteer due to legal status, but now I've made huge strides in raising GPA and getting in exp. could I potentially use this as an advantage?
If I were a DREAMer (undocumented student) until recently is there a way to talk about this without possibly running someone the wrong way, I know it is still a pretty touchy subject.
Freshman year GPA was around 3.1 and had no research/volunteer due to legal status, but now I've made huge strides in raising GPA and getting in exp. could I potentially use this as an advantage?
Well, that's why we'll be on admissions committees...
You're darn right
Hello!
Many thanks for lending SDN your time! I have a few questions, if you could so generously oblige to answer them.
1. I was wondering about how ADCOMS feel about a lighter course load while a student is studying for the MCAT, especially given the longer length and greater amount of covered material on the 2015 MCAT. At what point is a light course load too light?
2. How are ADCOM's planning to judge applicants on the basis of the new MCAT? I know this is a pretty vague question, so if this is too vague to answer, here's something more specific: are ADCOM's going to think of the new MCAT as harder, and therefore, accepting lower scores from applicants, or will they stick to the same standards (i.e. This person got a 35 on the new MCAT, so we'll judge that as we would a person who got a 35 on the old MCAT.)
Thank you 😀
Many thanks for lending SDN your time! I have a few questions, if you could so generously oblige to answer them.
1. I was wondering about how ADCOMS feel about a lighter course load while a student is studying for the MCAT, especially given the longer length and greater amount of covered material on the 2015 MCAT. At what point is a light course load too light?
2. How are ADCOM's planning to judge applicants on the basis of the new MCAT? I know this is a pretty vague question, so if this is too vague to answer, here's something more specific: are ADCOM's going to think of the new MCAT as harder, and therefore, accepting lower scores from applicants, or will they stick to the same standards (i.e. This person got a 35 on the new MCAT, so we'll judge that as we would a person who got a 35 on the old MCAT.)
Thank you 😀
Am I missing some subtext here? How do you know his sexual orientation?
For interviewers that only fill out a report and are not present at the meeting, is there any way for them to fight for an applicant or do they not know the outcome once their report has been submitted?
What proportion of interviewers are actually a part of the meetings at your school?
Thank you for all the answers 😍
In that post you mentioned emailing the interviewers again? Is there a chance that might come off as annoying especially since I've heard it's the dean that makes all wait list decisions.
The dean's role varies from school to school (some institutions do not even have admissions deans). A some (many?) places the committee is central to the creation and implementation of the wait list. Hence, although it is an outside shot, a small statement of continued interest might possibly play in your favor. I would only try this with my top choice, as believability is key.
In reading LORs the term "good" is almost an epithet. You are correct, the vast majority are positive, but that does not necessarily make them equal or interchangeable. Exceptional LORs come from people who know the applicant well, and can give the praise a truly convincing level of detail and earnestness. At the other end of the spectrum are LORs that say "X took three classes with me scored in the top 12%. He always appeared engaged and expressed strong command of the subject matter when seeking clarification." That does not tell me anything I could not guess from his transcript.
Many LOR writers who know the game conclude with a final assessment, which can be informative when you know the lingo. Believe it or not, there are distinctions between being recommend plainly, highly, with highest enthusiasm, with enthusiasm, strongly and without reservation, etc.
They could always approach committee members directly to make an extra appeal, but I cannot think of an example of this happening. Usually when an interviewer is strongly supportive it's because the candidate is very strong and will likely get accepted regardless.
LuciousVorenus said:
I don't know the proportion. Whatever it is, that number is very specific to our school and I don't think provides you or anyone else with useful information.
Touchy is right. Check your PM.
I'm in the process of filing bankruptcy due to debts unpaid for a few years after my divorce (so long that paying them now would not rescue my credit). Should I address this in my personal statement or leave it out? It was a situation I was thrown into, but I fear that this information might be uncovered somehow so I might need to answer for it.
When I get an application the student is either a citizen or permanent resident. I have no way of knowing about if someone was previously undocumented unless he/she discloses it in the personal statement or elsewhere. Even then I am guessing most would have been brought to the US as children, and therefore cannot be blamed for their prior status. Explaining it would be useful in accounting for the improvement in your record.
There is a thin line between explaining selected parts of your history and making yourself look bad. My primary concern would be finding out how bankruptcy/bad credit will affect my ability to get financial aid. I think you should still be able to qualify for federal loans, but contacting a med school's financial aid office may be extremely helpful in defining any unforeseen obstacles.
1. I don't hold it against anyone for having a light semester, although I would resist dropping below full-time status.
2. I believe the new MCAT is going to have a completely different scoring system, so as to remove the temptation to directly compare numbers. The MCAT has undergone more than a few significant revisions in the past, and I anticipate it will take a couple of years before people get familiar/comfortable with the newest one.
Thank you @hushcom for doing this!
1) Have you interviewed someone who was not under represented minority with a lower science GPA, say in the 3.0 range? If so, can they still be accepted with a good MCAT score (35+), acceptable cGPA (3.4) and good ECs? If someone was in this range, what would you recommend them to do if they still wanted to go to medical school?
2) Furthermore, is there a GPA "floor", where you guys won't consider someone with less than a 3.0 GPA?
3) How do you feel about Ws and audits? How many is too many in a 4 year time span? 4? 5?
4) Do you pay attention to the major of an applicant? Does it play a role in your decision, say a bio major vs a art history major? Many times a school will say they don't care about your major, but a chemical engineering major would have probably had a harder time in school than a non science major.
1) Have you interviewed someone who was not under represented minority with a lower science GPA, say in the 3.0 range? If so, can they still be accepted with a good MCAT score (35+), acceptable cGPA (3.4) and good ECs? If someone was in this range, what would you recommend them to do if they still wanted to go to medical school?
2) Furthermore, is there a GPA "floor", where you guys won't consider someone with less than a 3.0 GPA?
3) How do you feel about Ws and audits? How many is too many in a 4 year time span? 4? 5?
4) Do you pay attention to the major of an applicant? Does it play a role in your decision, say a bio major vs a art history major? Many times a school will say they don't care about your major, but a chemical engineering major would have probably had a harder time in school than a non science major.
J
James1992
Do I need to disclose an underage drinking ticket on my application? Is this a red flag to adcoms? Is it something I should address in my personal statement?
Offering. Why do you ask?
Not Hushcom, and just my opinion, but I would not volunteer bankruptcy information in your PS. Your PS is your chance to sell yourself, and including negative information that early in the process would be putting yourself at unnecessary disadvantage. You will want to disclose negative information shortly before the point where it would naturally be discovered so you can control the 'spin' and explain your side of the story before prejudices and assumptions are made. I don't know when or even if your credit score would be required, though I would disclose a bankruptcy filing before your background check, since it's likely it will come up then. And Hushcom's advice to check into your ability to qualify for student loans is absolutely on target. No loans, no med school...
Personally, I'd consider a bankruptcy along the lines of an IA -- as cause for concern that an applicant is perhaps not managing his life well. That's the preconception I'd bring to the table, and one you'd want to be prepared to address.
Hi,
I am trying to enroll in 1st year english course in my university but its in online form. There are no other 1st year english courses with lectures in my university. So my question is: Would it be okay for me to take an online course in this case?
I am trying to enroll in 1st year english course in my university but its in online form. There are no other 1st year english courses with lectures in my university. So my question is: Would it be okay for me to take an online course in this case?
Thank you so much for your valuable feedback. Two questions...
...
...
Last edited:
Hi Hushcom, thank you for doing this! I was wondering...would you consider these following PSYC classes as BCPM? 1. Brain and Behavior (all about the nervous system, action potentials, anatomy etc.) and 2. Physiological Psychology Lab (dissecting an animal brain and identifying its parts.
To me, it seems like a lot of science is involved but I looked at the AMCAS course classification guide and Psychology comes under Behavioral Sciences, not BCPM =/ If I listed these two courses as BCPM, do you think it would be accepted?
To me, it seems like a lot of science is involved but I looked at the AMCAS course classification guide and Psychology comes under Behavioral Sciences, not BCPM =/ If I listed these two courses as BCPM, do you think it would be accepted?
Why is the sGPA low? If it's because of C's as a freshman/sophomore and A's in upper level courses as a junior/senior then it shouldn't be much of an issue. If it's due to a bunch of B's it can be a bit more concerning, unless you are at a notoriously difficult undergrad. A high MCAT can mitigate a lot of the perceived risk of taking someone with a low sGPA, so that would definitely play in your favor. If that's the hand you hold right now then that's the hand you will have to play. About the only thing you could add would be some semesters of high quality post-bacc work.
GypsyHummus said:
If your cGPA is less than 3.0 you need a post-bacc of some sort, end of story. I am not saying people don't get in with <3.0's, but it's somewhat foolhardy to assume you will have success.
GypsyHummus said:
Sometimes there are a string of W's in one semester which relate to some sort of personal tragedy. Those are forgivable. Otherwise I get concerned when I see more than ~2, and it's much better if they happen during freshman/sophomore year. I can make some allowance for those who transfer from CC to a 4-year university, but by the time you are a junior you should have figured out the undergraduate game.
GypsyHummus said:
I pay attention to major because it may tell me something about the applicant. Also, our goal is to choose people who we think will make good physicians, not to choose people who won't have a hard time in med school.
You'll have to do better than that.
My first impression was that you were asking for a belated LOR, which I would not recommend. But if the person is offering one it changes the calculus a bit. In that case I would say go ahead, there is really no downside.
This sounds like a strange university, but if online is all you have then online is all you have.
Yes, your last 120 hours + a 4.0 post-bacc looks good. Your cGPA might get you screened out a some schools, but others will give you more of a look. Being the CEO of an internet start-up in the health/wellness industry may play to your favor or against it, depending on the details. If you were selling cosmeceuticals, for instance, don't expect a lot of love.
yanks2dmb said:
AMCAS asks about convictions. No conviction = do not disclose. Even if your friend did have to disclose, a 13 yo pot/fake ID beef without adjudication is about the biggest legal non-issue I can think of.
I honestly do not think it matters one way or the other.
Last edited:
Sounds like a worthy set of endeavors which should serve you well. Good luck.
J
James1992
Could you please elaborate? I received it two years ago and I've matured a lot since then. The rest of my application is fine. I just don't want past mistakes to haunt me.
Hm..
Let's say I am an applicant for your school.
sGPA: 3.8
cGPA: 3.9
Double majored in bio and psych.
Good extracurricular activities.
MCAT: (Didnt take it yet, but let's assume) 14/8/11
Would this "8" on verbal give you pause as well?
I was born here, but I moved to Korea when I was 2.. and then I came back when I was 15. (I have US citizenship)
Does this fact "help" my low verbal score?
Also, do you have any biases towards people with foreign accents?
I have a strong Korean accent..
Last edited:
Thanks so much for sticking with this hushcom. Your advice so far has been very helpful.
I want to ask about how a committee will view an applicant who attended a 4-year university but was dropped because of failing grades. I was unsure about my career path and lacked the drive to do well in school. Since then I attended 2 years at a community college and then graduated from a 4-year. I maintained a 4.0 throughout CC and graduated with a 3.7 from the 4-year. I have a 33 MCAT and I have years of EMS experience and volunteer experience as well as other paid EC's to help pay for school.
My question is, will a committee write off my application because of my string of poor grades at my first school or will they try to look more at the upward trend that followed? Also do you have any suggestions for how to portray my dismissal and return to school in as positive a light as possible.
Thank you very much
I want to ask about how a committee will view an applicant who attended a 4-year university but was dropped because of failing grades. I was unsure about my career path and lacked the drive to do well in school. Since then I attended 2 years at a community college and then graduated from a 4-year. I maintained a 4.0 throughout CC and graduated with a 3.7 from the 4-year. I have a 33 MCAT and I have years of EMS experience and volunteer experience as well as other paid EC's to help pay for school.
My question is, will a committee write off my application because of my string of poor grades at my first school or will they try to look more at the upward trend that followed? Also do you have any suggestions for how to portray my dismissal and return to school in as positive a light as possible.
Thank you very much
what's your opinion on double majors and a low gpa? also, what about repplicants?
I prefer to answer questions about actual MCAT scores rather than speculative ones, but an 8 VR is not a deal breaker with me, especially if the rest of the app is solid. I do think ESL candidates are at a bit of a disadvantage there.
brood910 said:
I assume you mean bias against people with foreign accents. A lot of medical practice involves verbal communication with patients and other practitioners, and if your accent is so strong as to seriously impede this communication it would probably be seen as unfavorable. I work with many doctors for whom English is a second language, and if you think your accent is a problem I would advise seeking resources to help diminish it.
