- Joined
- Jun 2, 2016
- Messages
- 460
- Reaction score
- 295
I'm not talking like 4.0 and 40+ where everyone is clamoring to give you a spot, but like average 3.7,30 applicants.
I'm not talking like 4.0 and 40+ where everyone is clamoring to give you a spot, but like average 3.7,30 applicants.
What's an example? There might be differences in what exact stats are being shown between the MSAR and the school (median vs mean, stats for accepted vs matriculated, full range vs 10th-90th, maybe even prior year vs school average over the last four). If my understanding is correct, the stats data in the MSAR is reported directly by the same organization that calculates applicant GPAs and assigns MCATs, so it's the gold standard and would be tough to get wrong.4 schools in TX had lower stats than the MSAR reported
Are you certain you're comparing apples to apples? If you asked a school for their average stats and the MSAR reports a median, they can be .2/1-2 apart and still both correct. Or the school may have given you numbers for their Texan admits while the MSAR reports all admits, etc. Can you share what exactly you asked for, school names redacted? Alternatively you could PM me an example class profile that differs from the MSAR.I know .2 difference in gpa or 1-2 points in MCAT scores aren't that big to some people, but for me that's huge.
Like efle said, it is probably average/mean vs median. Most schools have medians above their meanI don't want to name the schools (4 state schools), because I'm always concerned about the schools being on here and I don't want to say anything specific. But honestly the MSAR was a huge waste of money ( for me). I just called those 4 schools, but I also compared class profiles and MSAR data and several schools varied. I know .2 difference in gpa or 1-2 points in MCAT scores aren't that big to some people, but for me that's huge. That's just my opinion- I know many people have been helped by it, but it just made me freak out more haha
Are you certain you're comparing apples to apples? If you asked a school for their average stats and the MSAR reports a median, they can be .2/1-2 apart and still both correct. Or the school may have given you numbers for their Texan admits while the MSAR reports all admits, etc. Can you share what exactly you asked for, school names redacted? Alternatively you could PM me an example class profile that differs from the MSAR.
Like efle said, it is probably average/mean vs median. Most schools have medians above their mean
Very few MD applicants leave TX.
Last year it was only 215 (compare that to 1,528 from CA). They tend to be folks who attended OOS private schools and were recruitment scholarship candidates.
AAMC doesn't tell us exactly where they went. I only know because TX applicants are rarely interviewed unless they fall into one of the categories I mentioned. https://www.aamc.org/download/321466/data/factstablea5.pdfMay I ask where you found this information? I'm wondering because I would like to see the data on where TX students went to out of state so I can adjust my school list.
Were they giving you their total class values, perhaps, instead of just the most recent year? It's hard for me to understand how the MSAR can make an error, since they calculate your GPA as included in your app, they score and send out your MCAT, they send the app to the school, and they track and report who gets accepted where. My other guess is that there is some variation in how the numbers are calculated - the school may calculate GPA for each applicant differently and then read you their calculated median values, while the MSAR would continue reporting the correct median AMCAS GPA.I specifically asked them for both median and mean, and gave them the MSAR data as well. Like I said- for me the MSAR wasn't helpful, but obviously to others it is.
AAMC doesn't tell us exactly where they went. I only know because TX applicants are rarely interviewed unless they fall into one of the categories I mentioned. https://www.aamc.org/download/321466/data/factstablea5.pdf
Were they giving you their total class values, perhaps, instead of just the most recent year? It's hard for me to understand how the MSAR can make an error, since they calculate your GPA as included in your app, they score and send out your MCAT, they send the app to the school, and they track and report who gets accepted where. My other guess is that there is some variation in how the numbers are calculated - the school may calculate GPA for each applicant differently and then read you their calculated median values, while the MSAR would continue reporting the correct median AMCAS GPA.
The explanation could be from this, perhaps the average GPA for the class goes up if you calculate with +/- included.TMDAS and AMCAS gpas are calculated differently.
Where in the MSAR do you find means?I specifically asked if they knew about MSAR and gave them the data- both median and mean.
The MSAR is not self-reported. As such, it is a better source of data.I've noticed what MI2015 has been saying as well. Calling schools or looking at most recent class profiles has seemed to vary from MSAR data, as well. If I'm not mistaken adcoms compare your stats to the most recent class. I remember seeing a couple class profiles average GPA/science GPA that were about 0.15 off MSAR reported data
I do completely understand that, but why would schools present stats that are lower than the MSAR that's what I don't get.The MSAR is not self-reported. As such it is a better source of data.
Probably aren't the same things being reported!I do completely understand that, but why would schools present stats that are lower than the MSAR that's what I don't get.
It might expand their applicant pool.I do completely understand that, but why would schools present stats that are lower than the MSAR that's what I don't get.
It might expand their applicant pool.
I did!
I received II to: Florida Atlantic University, University of South Florida or University of Central Florida (I can't remember which, but one of those), Indiana U, and Virginia Commonwealth University. I didn't attend a single OOS interview--mostly because I had already spent a significant amount of money attending 7 interviews here in TX.
If you are an average applicant I would definitely invest in the MSAR. I chose to apply to IU and VCU solely because they accept a high number of OOS students. Because only a small number of OOS students apply there (most OOSers try their luck with private schools) I had a really high chance of receiving an interview. I applied to both schools in June and received interview invites from them in Oct. I had luck with Florida schools mostly because I have really strong ties to Florida and I stressed it in my secondary essays.
If you want to stay in Texas I wouldn't bother applying out of state--I wasted a lot of money. I have average stats and I did just fine. If you have to apply OOS I'd definitely put VCU and IU on your list.
Wow thanks! I already applied AMCAS as well, but I was feeling kinda bummed about my chances of getting an OOS interview.
Although, what is your idea of average stats? Haha to get 7 interviews in TX you must have pretty good ones. Some people think average is 3.9/35 lol
I have a LizzyM of <70. If you want specifics I can pm you.
I did!
I received II to: Florida Atlantic University, University of South Florida or University of Central Florida (I can't remember which, but one of those), Indiana U, and Virginia Commonwealth University. I didn't attend a single OOS interview--mostly because I had already spent a significant amount of money attending 7 interviews here in TX.
If you are an average applicant I would definitely invest in the MSAR. I chose to apply to IU and VCU solely because they accept a high number of OOS students. Because only a small number of OOS students apply there (most OOSers try their luck with private schools) I had a really high chance of receiving an interview. I applied to both schools in June and received interview invites from them in Oct. I had luck with Florida schools mostly because I have really strong ties to Florida and I stressed it in my secondary essays.
If you want to stay in Texas I wouldn't bother applying out of state--I wasted a lot of money. I have average stats and I did just fine. If you have to apply OOS I'd definitely put VCU and IU on your list.
A perfect illustration --
Most TX applicants with ~average stats have pretty good chances at an in-state acceptance which means attending a really good school for a great price tag. Why would someone turn that down?
OK, there are reasons: Strong ties to another location (ex. Florida), high likelihood of financial aid (so how "average are they?), or gunning for a tippy top tier school (again, "average"?) Or maybe they just really really don't want to be in TX...
As @Chlorini experience demonstrates, the yield for OOS schools offering invitations to TX students is pretty low. S/he didn't even attend those interviews, despite those strong ties to the state.
My suggestion -- If you're just applying OOS MD "to be safe" -- don't. Lots of time and money for a low probability of success. (@Chlorini was offered acceptances in state, so despite the IIs, gained absolutely nothing from the OOS applications) If you want to "be safe" and have genuine doubts about your chances for TX MD, then apply DO.
My suggestion -- If you're just applying OOS MD "to be safe" -- don't. Lots of time and money for a low probability of success.
there's only about 10 schools I want to add. I know it probably won't make a difference, but I don't want to regret not doing it.
This x1000. A better use of your time would be prepping for interviews (learning more about ACA, preparing for common questions, etc). All those extra secondaries are a huge drain -- both in terms of time, money, and mental energy. Finishing the TX secondaries alone was painful enough for me.
10 extra schools is a very high number, but it's your time and money. There will always be n=1 stories and there will always be the risk of getting in nowhere.
@Chlorini mentioned IU. That school has incredibly expensive OOS tuition (~$53k/year), which is probably why it doesn't have that many OOS applicants.