Anyone else not getting as much tail in med school as they thought they would?

[burritowithgreensauce]

---

Members do not see this ad.

Becoming a med student means you will have no time or money for 7-10 years. That really isn't a big selling point. Most dates aren't that into such longterm investment. Combine that with the fact that if you had no game in college you aren't going to be magically better as "Student doctor Poit". might as well wear an eye patch to the bars because chicks dig pirates.

Correction. Chicks dig butt pirates

 

[Psai]

False. "Game" matters a lot yes. I'm implying that there are a lot of guys that are good at it and therefore it isn't much of a factor. If only half of attractive guys had "game" that still leaves a lot of guys that have it. If you have 20 girls and 20 guys, it's very easy for the 3 guys who have both attractiveness and game to have their pick of those 20 and that's exactly what occurs until you get older.

Girls don't care about looks half as much as you think they do

 

[MedicineZ0Z]

Girls don't care about looks half as much as you think they do

Thing is a majority of girls are not attractive and therefore can't be picky about looks. If they're average which most people are by definition then average is generally the best they can do. So while you're correct in a way you're definitely incorrect in what you're trying to actually say.
Humans are very visual whether it's male or female.

 

[user121]

delete

 

[Law2Doc]

...So while you're correct in a way you're definitely incorrect in what you're trying to actually say...

I find it humerous that despite being so many deviations off the curve in this thread you continue to claim to be the judge of what's right and wrong. Ever think maybe everyone else is right and it's your logic that's faulty? Because there are several hundred years of experiences here weighing against your 20 or so. When you yell red and the rest of the room votes blue, odds are its not everyone else who is mistaken. That's where you stop being logical. On questions of perception, lots of eyes beat one. This isn't an Emporer has no clothes situation...

 

[Law2Doc]

I agree with some of your other posts to an extent and see what you are saying, especially in regards to some of the ones others disagree with, but you are dead wrong on this one...

I would argue he's been dead wrong throughout this thread. It's clearly a topic he doesn't understand and so he's created a construct of "logic" and "common sense" to explain why attractive women don't give certain guys (him maybe) the time of day. And he's so locked in that notion that he refuses to believe that any engagement not driven by looks is not an outlier. It's both funny and kind of sad. But I'm sure he will find someone he thinks merits his level of looks and never know what could have been. 🙂

 

[Goro]

My learned colleague is pointing out cognitive dissonance in action!

I would argue he's been dead wrong throughout this thread. It's clearly a topic he doesn't understand and so he's created a construct of "logic" and "common sense" to explain why attractive women don't give certain guys (him maybe) the time of day. And he's so locked in that notion that he refuses to believe that any engagement not driven by looks is not an outlier. It's both funny and kind of sad. But I'm sure he will find someone he thinks merits his level of looks and never know what could have been. 🙂

 

[IsWhat]

I can't find the study, but wasn't it found that the "Dad" body is actually more attractive to women than six-pack abs? I remember hearing this on the radio - if true, it is a strange world we live in indeed.

 

[user121]

🙄

 

[MedicineZ0Z]

I would argue he's been dead wrong throughout this thread. It's clearly a topic he doesn't understand and so he's created a construct of "logic" and "common sense" to explain why attractive women don't give certain guys (him maybe) the time of day. And he's so locked in that notion that he refuses to believe that any engagement not driven by looks is not an outlier. It's both funny and kind of sad. But I'm sure he will find someone he thinks merits his level of looks and never know what could have been. 🙂

Age difference, that's why. You forget that someone linked an article with some science behind it supporting what I'm saying.

I can't find the study, but wasn't it found that the "Dad" body is actually more attractive to women than six-pack abs? I remember hearing this on the radio - if true, it is a strange world we live in indeed.

As long as you're not full out fat or very skinny then a guy's body isn't all that important to a girl.

 

[edgerock24]

I already pointed out I know a couple very attractive guys who have multiple one night stands a week using things like Tinder. Maybe of their hook ups are with girls in relationships.

Everything that you say is a little wrong in some way.

And stop bragging about how many "attractive guys" you know. It's becoming evident that you are more interested in them than the various girls that they are supposedly speaking with.

 

[jeffk805dent]

Everything that you say is a little wrong in some way.

And stop bragging about how many "attractive guys" you know. It's becoming evident that you are more interested in them than the various girls that they are supposedly speaking with.

he thirsty

 

[MedicineZ0Z]

Everything that you say is a little wrong in some way.

And stop bragging about how many "attractive guys" you know. It's becoming evident that you are more interested in them than the various girls that they are supposedly speaking with.

Wrong according to what though?

http://www.livescience.com/2307-romance-matters-beautiful.html

"turned out, more attractive people placed more importance on physical attractiveness above other features in selecting their dates. Less attractive people placed more weight on other qualities, such as sense of humor."

"Beautiful people marry beautiful people and less beautiful people marry less beautiful people," said Dan Ariely, a professor of behavioral economics at MIT's Program in Media Arts and Sciences and Sloan School of Management"

 

[PL198]

I can't find the study, but wasn't it found that the "Dad" body is actually more attractive to women than six-pack abs? I remember hearing this on the radio - if true, it is a strange world we live in indeed.

use your brain. yeah I'm sure being fat is more attractive than being in shape. jesus christ

this explains why you see so many guys with 6 packs who cry all night because they can't find dates, meanwhile the guys who sit on their couch all day drinking mountain dew and playing halo have women crawling all over them

/s