Anyone get word about Drew at UCLA?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Originally posted by exmike
Maybe Geffen was like to Drew "hey we want this Luwi girl REALLY bad, can you please hold off on her and give us first dibs?!?" and thus the silence from drew 🙂

:laugh: That's too cute! Thanks for the support Mike! Although I wish that were the case...I'm not countin' on it.

Hey Mike, have you made a decision Case Wes vs Drew? If there is anything I can ask these Drew faculty or med students over here to help ease your decision, then please let me know...pm me.
 
Originally posted by Luwi25
My file was reviewed by the Drew committee but I'm quite sure that only the files that Drew "accepts" are sent to UCLA's committee for approval.

But the weird thing was that during my interview at UCLA, the first question they asked was where I had interviewed before. So, I went through all the places I'd interviewed at and forgot to mention Drew. But she KNEW that I had interviewed at Drew and said "Also drew right" and wrote it down before I could say a word. How did she know that? Do Adcoms know which schools you've interviewed at before, and if so, why the heck do they ask? Not a big deal but I've been wondering about that since my UCLA interview. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

luwi, im almost certain that drew and ucla talk to one another. i dont think they knew about your other interviews, but they knew about your drew one. and that is a good sign like mike said. its likely that ucla liked you.

good luck!
 
LOS ANGELES
King/Drew Is Again Assailed Over Prescription Drug Flaws
State inspectors are second group in a week to chastise the hospital for giving the wrong medication to a patient with meningitis.
By Charles Ornstein
Times Staff Writer

March 5, 2004

Government health inspectors plan to cite Martin Luther King Jr./Drew Medical Center for serious flaws in the way prescription drugs are managed at the public hospital in South Los Angeles.

The findings follow an investigation into an error last month in which the wrong patient received a potent anti-cancer drug for four days.

The California Department of Health Services this week told King/Drew hospital it would be cited for failing to administer medication accurately, delaying care and services for a patient, failing to clarify medication errors, and lacking "general oversight" over pharmaceutical services, according to a summary of the findings provided to Los Angeles County supervisors by the county health department.

The state hospital inspectors were the second group of regulators in a week to chastise the hospital for giving the anti-cancer medication Gleevec to a patient with meningitis.

Representatives from the California Board of Pharmacy cited the hospital for the error several days ago.

The state health department outlined its findings at a meeting with King/Drew leaders Wednesday night and will follow up with specific details in writing.

The expected citations would put the hospital at increased risk of losing federal funding for Medicare and Medi-Cal patients, but King/Drew would be given the chance to respond before any action was taken.

King/Drew, a 233-bed hospital in Willowbrook, just south of Watts, already faces the loss of federal funding because of unfavorable inspections in other areas.

In recent months, state and federal inspectors have cited the hospital for a pattern of lapses in care, including the deaths of five patients last year after a host of errors by nurses and other employees.

Medication errors are fairly common in hospitals, but county health officials said the latest mix-up at King/Drew Medical Center was more serious because it was not caught for several days.

"If you look at medication errors, generally you'll see wrong dosages or missed medications, but usually it's caught quicker and resolved," said Fred Leaf, the county health department's chief operating officer, who is leading a crisis management team at the hospital.

"This went on for four days," Leaf said.

"That to me signifies a little greater problem in terms of staff competence in the area of medication management."

Leaf said his agency was still weighing discipline for the employees involved.

"Obviously, these nurses didn't know what the drug was and they didn't make an effort to know what the drug was, so they didn't follow their own nursing practice appropriately," Leaf said.

From now on, two King/Drew nurses must check to ensure the accuracy of orders for high-risk drugs and a nursing supervisor must review drug orders each shift.

Doctors are also being instructed to play a greater role in ensuring patients receive the right medications.
 
Originally posted by docmemi
LOS ANGELES
King/Drew Is Again Assailed Over Prescription Drug Flaws
State inspectors are second group in a week to chastise the hospital for giving the wrong medication to a patient with meningitis.
By Charles Ornstein
Times Staff Writer

March 5, 2004


dammit, that's my job. I honestly missed this article. I must be slipping. Oh wait, it was on the day of one of my big tests.
 
Does anybody know what day the Drew/UCLA committee meets?? Any recent accepts?? Good luck everybody!
 
Originally posted by Medbound2004
Does anybody know what day the Drew/UCLA committee meets?? Any recent accepts?? Good luck everybody!

They generally meet on Thursdays but due to crunch time for Mar 15th, I think they might meet more often than that.
 
Drew is actually very late with their acceptances a lot of the time. A lot of the people who I know who attend Drew found out the day before orientation or during orientation, so there is a lot of hope until until the last day.
 
Originally posted by Jalby
Drew is actually very late with their acceptances a lot of the time. A lot of the people who I know who attend Drew found out the day before orientation or during orientation, so there is a lot of hope until until the last day.

This is VERY true Jalby...I personally know FIVE 3rd year med students that did not find out until like the end of July/ early August! It's so weird why they do this. I have a good friend that was accepted 5 weeks after interviewing but she's a genius and got into every med school she applied to so that doesn't count. :laugh:

At first I was like...ARRGGHHH! +pissed+

But now I'm just over it and think I'll just snooze till or of I ever hear from them 😴
 
Originally posted by Luwi25
This is VERY true Jalby...I personally know FIVE 3rd year med students that did not find out until like the end of July/ early August! It's so weird why they do this. I have a good friend that was accepted 5 weeks after interviewing but she's a genius and got into every med school she applied to so that doesn't count.

I know. IT's sooo shocking that something that is associated with the Drew name would take that long to do something 😉
 
Originally posted by Jalby
I know. IT's sooo shocking that something that is associated with the Drew name would take that long to do something 😉

Lol! :laugh: Why am I not surprised?
 
they are probably slow in sending letters on purpose, like for politics, imo. or they are just trying to pick the very best group (remember they interview a lot for such a small program) they can for the small number of spots.
 
I vote for the admissions set up being not the best. (PS, I would vote that for another school, too)
 
I am really curious as to how many acceptances have already gone out. I called and Dr. Aguerila said I should hear something soon. So far, exmike is the only person in SDNland to be accepted. When does Drew typically send waitlist letters?
 
Originally posted by Medbound2004
I am really curious as to how many acceptances have already gone out. I called and Dr. Aguerila said I should hear something soon. So far, exmike is the only person in SDNland to be accepted. When does Drew typically send waitlist letters?

I'm pretty sure that waitlist letters go out AFTER acceptances but don't quote me on this. You actually called Dr. Aguilera? He wasn't mad about that?
 
medb, how come you didnt ask dr a himself how many acceptances were sent out? did you ask him if they were still sending acceptances for the dec batch?
 
Dr. Aguerila seemed very nice on the telephone. I think he actually remembered who I was. I didn't really want to get on his nerves so I only asked him questions that pertained only to my application. I also interviewed with him, and he give me his card to call him...so I felt pretty at ease calling him.
 
this came through my email today from california healthline. thought it might be of interest. good luck to all of you waiting on drew 🙂

Los Angeles County Supervisors Request Plan To Operate King/Drew Medical Center Without Medical School
03/10/2004


The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday requested that the county Department of Health Services develop operating procedures to run county-owned Martin Luther King Jr./Drew Medical Center by May 1 without its affiliated medical school, Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science, the AP/Fresno Bee reports (AP/Fresno Bee, 3/10). According to the Los Angeles Times, the order was designed to "prod reform" at the school (Landsberg, Los Angeles Times, 3/10). In January, the medical school placed President Dr. Charles Francis on paid administrative leave, following a task force report stating that he had lost the confidence of many members of the hospital's board, faculty and surrounding community. The task force report also said that it is not possible to sustain the school's 18 residency training programs at King/Drew given its average of 200 inpatients; recommended a cooperative medical residency program with a larger, more prestigious institution; called for the school to establish a "culture of accountability"; and recommended a leadership transition at the school. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education last month recommended closing King/Drew's neonatal residency program. ACGME previously found King/Drew's oversight of its medical resident training programs to be substandard and decided to revoke accreditation for the facility's surgery and radiology residency programs, effective June 2004 (California Healthline, 1/14).

Reaction
Officials from the medical school said that the supervisors were "overlook[ing] aggressive efforts at reform," including changes to the school's board of trustees and a call to national experts to help turn around teaching programs, the Times reports. According to the Times, Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky suggested that supervisors could use "political clout" to get the University of Southern California or the University of California-Los Angeles to take over the training programs at King/Drew if necessary. However, neither university has shown interest in taking over such programs. Dr. Harry Douglas, the interim president at King/Drew, said, "There are a lot of concrete things that are occurring," adding, "There is a sense of urgency on all of our parts." Yaroslavsky said, "I want to keep the pressure on." Supervisor Gloria Molina said that the supervisors needed to accept that they also had a part in the problems at King/Drew, saying, "I think it's a two way street. ... The failings are also on our side of the street." Molina made a call for the supervisors to hold "what would certainly be a contentious public hearing in the community" on the hospital reforms, the Times reports. Supervisor Yvonne Brathwaite Burke, whose district includes King/Drew, said she did not see a reason for a meeting (Los Angeles Times, 3/10).
 
So... whats this mean for the Drew/UCLA program? 🙁
 
Originally posted by exmike
So... whats this mean for the Drew/UCLA program? 🙁

That means you're admitted to UCLA's regular program, bro 😀
 
To be honest I don't really see any distinction between the quality of education one would recieve at the main UCLA program versus UCLA/Drew, the missions of the programs are different at thats about it. Students from both programs have access to the same opporunitites. Exmike, you should feel rather privileged.
If the problems at King/Drew hospital arent resolved, the UCLA/Drew students with probably do rotations at UCLA or other UCLA-affilated hospitals for the 3rd year. The 4th year students from both programs can go anywhere.
 
Originally posted by Medbound2004
To be honest I don't really see any distinction between the quality of education one would recieve at the main UCLA program versus UCLA/Drew, the missions of the programs are different at thats about it. Students from both programs have access to the same opporunitites. Exmike, you should feel rather privileged.
If the problems at King/Drew hospital arent resolved, the UCLA/Drew students with probably do rotations at UCLA or other UCLA-affilated hospitals for the 3rd year. The 4th year students from both programs can go anywhere.

Actually you spend 1.5 years at King/Drew, so you only get half of your fourth year to do away rotations.

Its almost universally accepted that your clinical grades are more important for applications to selective residencies. It follows that the reputation of your clinical training program is important for matching to a selective residency. This is where a student in the Drew program could falter.

In all honesty, the basic sciences is pretty much equivalent across the country, absent teaching style, since the material required for Step I is pretty much standard. It is the clinical education that sets medical schools apart. With the problems at Drew/UCLA, the low inpatient population, I would wonder how good the clinical education is, and following that, how competitive students are coming out of the Drew program in residency placements.

Things I'm thinking about daily now.. *sigh*
 
Originally posted by exmike
Actually you spend 1.5 years at King/Drew, so you only get half of your fourth year to do away rotations.

Its almost universally accepted that your clinical grades are more important for applications to selective residencies. It follows that the reputation of your clinical training program is important for matching to a selective residency. This is where a student in the Drew program could falter.

In all honesty, the basic sciences is pretty much equivalent across the country, absent teaching style, since the material required for Step I is pretty much standard. It is the clinical education that sets medical schools apart. With the problems at Drew/UCLA, the low inpatient population, I would wonder how good the clinical education is, and following that, how competitive students are coming out of the Drew program in residency placements.

Things I'm thinking about daily now.. *sigh*

Mike is right, that was what I consider too when I was thinking whether to remain on the waitlist of Pritzker, which has long lecture hours and traditional basic science curriculum, but great clinical training and resource in law/business/public policy school.
 
that would be cool, yet also sad, for the admitted drew students. its too early to speculate anything.

the program will always be very different and awesome.
 
i still think there is no difference. it depends on your step 1 (ucla will prep you for that), your rotations (on the bright side youre at a county hospital and plus half of 4th your out and about...great experience), ucla's 4th year colleges concept is very unique...you can get connections to some extent for the residency you want, and youll be doing a research project (im pretty sure no other school in the nation has that). i think just like applying to med school, a lot of it depends also on you. and plus, no matter what anyone wants to say, youre a ucla student as much as anyone else is!! by the same token, you are also a drew student, but thats not my point.

again i think the program is great. some people just dont see that or dont want to see that. i hope i dont get flamed for defending drew.

thoughts?
 
Exmike, I agree with you about the importance of the 3rd year clinical education as being the foundation for securing a top residency position, but looking at the 2002 and 2001 match results, Drew/UCLA students match very strongly across the nation and definitely in California.
 
Originally posted by Medbound2004
Exmike, I agree with you about the importance of the 3rd year clinical education as being the foundation for securing a top residency position, but looking at the 2002 and 2001 match results, Drew/UCLA students match very strongly across the nation and definitely in California.

amen.
 
I can't believe is only 4 days until March 15th....:wow: Where on where did the time go? Luckly I have already been accepted somewhere.:hardy:
 
the original article from today appears in the LA Times.... Contemplating King/Drew Without School, http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-kingdrew10mar10,1,1421180.story?coll=la-headlines-california


Im loving what it said (see below)... basically, King/Drew isnt going anywhere and Drew is prolly going to stay around forever. :clap: :clap: :clap:

--------
Supervisor Gloria Molina said the supervisors should acknowledge that they, and not just the university, bear responsibility for failures at King/Drew.

"I don't have any problem with holding people's feet to the fire; that's a fair thing to be doing," she said. "But I think it's a two-way street, and I think we have to understand and respect that this didn't come about exclusively by the failings of Drew?. The failings are also on our side of the street."

Molina also called for the supervisors to hold what would certainly be a contentious public hearing in the community that depends on King/Drew. The hospital, located in Willowbrook, south of Watts, serves some of the county's poorest residents in South Los Angeles and adjoining communities.

"There are still people who believe that it is the intention of this board to close down Martin Luther King," Molina said. "I think we need to go out there and dissuade the community that that is not the case here, that we're trying to shore it up."
 
You actually only posted the good part of the article, and Molina isn't exactly representative of the board. She's the far left of it, and she is the only person on the board who was saying anything of that extent, and I think she was only doing it to shore up her support. I'd be shocked if anything she suggested ever comes about.
 
You know, sometimes it's really disturbing to me that applicants apply to drew not because of their unique mission and to serve that community but rather to just be "considered" a UCLA med student.

The beauty of the Drew program IS King County hospital and your chance to do rotations there. That community REALLY needs that hospital there with competent doctors. And actually, you would get MUCH BETTER clinical experience at King than at any other UCLA affiliated rotation site.

One of the rotation sites that I did a one year internship at was Santa Monica-UCLA, and after being in the ER for 4 months doing rotations with the UCLA med students, the worst case I saw come through there was an MI. At King County, you get stabbings, gun shot wounds (last week my Drew co-worker's brother was shot and taken to King county), and some of the most challenging cases daily, where you'd actually be DOING SOMETHING rather than sitting around and watching the attending. It's hands-on at Drew...ask any Drew medical student. So I'd WANT to be a part of Drew, do my rotations at King-county and would not be ashamed to be affiliated with this amazing program.

So I truly feel sad if anyone just applied to Drew to be a part of UCLA. We need physicians that WANT to be at those communities because there is a dire shortage of medical providers there. We don't need physicians there just because they have to be there...it defeats the purpose of Drew's mission. So I think that anyone that wouldn't want to do rotations at King County should not even go to Drew for medical school...you'd just be miserable if you didn't truly WANT to be there.
 
Originally posted by Luwi25
You know, sometimes it's really disturbing to me that applicants apply to drew not because of their unique mission and to serve that community but rather to just be "considered" a UCLA med student.

The beauty of the Drew program IS King County hospital and your chance to do rotations there. That community REALLY needs that hospital there with competent doctors. And actually, you would get MUCH BETTER clinical experience at King than at any other UCLA affiliated rotation site.

One of the rotation sites that I did a one year internship at was Santa Monica-UCLA, and after being in the ER for 4 months doing rotations with the UCLA med students, the worst case I saw come through there was an MI. At King County, you get stabbings, gun shot wounds (last week my Drew co-worker's brother was shot and taken to King county), and some of the most challenging cases daily, where you'd actually be DOING SOMETHING rather than sitting around and watching the attending. It's hands-on at Drew...ask any Drew medical student. So I'd WANT to be a part of Drew, do my rotations at King-county and would not be ashamed to be affiliated with this amazing program.

So I truly feel sad if anyone just applied to Drew to be a part of UCLA. We need physicians that WANT to be at those communities because there is a dire shortage of medical providers there. We don't need physicians there just because they have to be there...it defeats the purpose of Drew's mission. So I think that anyone that wouldn't want to do rotations at King County should not even go to Drew for medical school...you'd just be miserable if you didn't truly WANT to be there.

Luwi I definitely agree with you. However, I must say that regardless of mission or affiliation, I want a quality clinical education so I wish there was some way Drew could guarantee that to the incoming students. Obviously the controversey around King/Drew at this point has to do with the quality of their training programs which is directly related to the quality of their clinical education programs for the Drew students. The real question is whether or not these issues will be resolved by the time we (c/o 2008) enter rotations.

I think for many it will come down to whether or not your belief in the Drew missions outwieghs your insecurities about the future of the hospital. In the end I think that will be a good filter for those that just want the UCLA diploma. At least I hope.
 
Originally posted by exmike
Luwi I definitely agree with you. However, I must say that regardless of mission or affiliation, I want a quality clinical education so I wish there was some way Drew could guarantee that to the incoming students. Obviously the controversey around King/Drew at this point has to do with the quality of their training programs which is directly related to the quality of their clinical education programs for the Drew students. The real question is whether or not these issues will be resolved by the time we (c/o 2008) enter rotations.

I think for many it will come down to whether or not your belief in the Drew missions outwieghs your insecurities about the future of the hospital. In the end I think that will be a good filter for those that just want the UCLA diploma. At least I hope.

This is true Mike, and I hope that it is a coincidental filter. As for the problems, I honestly don't think it will be resolved overnight and I'm sure the c/o 2008 will also face issues (hopefully not this extreme) during rotations. But we need more dedicated physicians there that will improve the quality of care and demonstrate some leadership in bringing King County back up to Par. We need more money, more competent staff and better organizational skills and these will all come once we get a board of directors that are actually dedicated to the program and not just to their own paychecks.
 
there are very strong ties between ucla and drew. much of the faculty and administration, esp those involved with education and student affairs, work at both institutions. that says a lot imo...
 
Has anybody heard of any new acceptances given out for Drew/UCLA...is already March 12th...Did anybody call them today?
 
There was an article in the LATimes today about King coming close to losing it's medicaid funding. I'll post it later if someone doesn't beat me to it (have my last test in 49 minutes)
 
Great point Luwi!!!! I so agree with you....Good luck!!!!!

:clap: :clap: :clap:
 
here ya go. jalby, hope your last exam went well. bet your happy! now you have to study for step 1. good luck!

King/ Drew Funds Are at Risk
U.S. officials warn they will cut off Medicare and Medi-Cal payments if the county hospital fails to correct lapses in dispensing medication.



By Tracy Weber and Charles Ornstein, Times Staff Writers


Federal health officials said Thursday that they would cut off funds to Martin Luther King Jr./ Drew Medical Center unless the hospital corrected serious flaws in the way it handled prescription drugs within two weeks.

"The findings, in our opinion, rose to the level of immediate jeopardy to the health and safety of patients," said Steven Chickering, a manager for the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in San Francisco. "They have some serious issues to address, and this particular situation. They need to address them quickly."



The threat and its tight deadline were outlined in a letter Wednesday to King/Drew that was obtained by The Times. The letter marks an escalation in the U.S. government's attempts to force Los Angeles County, which owns the hospital, to fix the problems there. Other recent inspections that found deficiencies simply required hospital officials to submit a plan of correction.

Fewer than 10 hospitals in the four-state region that includes California receive "immediate jeopardy" termination notices each year, Chickering said.

The government inspection at the Willowbrook hospital was triggered by an error last month in which a meningitis patient was mistakenly given a potent anti-cancer drug for four days. The patient does not appear to have suffered long-term harm.

The letter Wednesday came with an inspection report detailing a chain of deficiencies in the way drugs are managed at the 233-bed hospital. But federal and county health officials declined to release the report to The Times, saying it was not public information until the hospital submitted a response.

A summary prepared by county health officials after the inspectors' visit March 3 indicates that King/Drew was cited for failing to administer medication accurately, delaying care and services for a patient, failing to investigate medication errors and lacking "general oversight" over pharmacy services.

The county has until March 23 to prove to inspectors that these problems have been corrected or it risks losing more than $200 million to cover Medicare and Medi-Cal patients. The funding accounts for more than half of the hospital's annual budget.

The county intends to submit its plan of correction by Monday, which would trigger a second visit by federal inspectors to ensure that the hospital had complied.

Chickering said most hospitals "understand the seriousness of the situation and what would happen if they would lose their Medicare certification, so they usually take the necessary steps to remove the immediate jeopardy."

King/Drew was cited this month by the California Board of Pharmacy for the cancer drug error.

County health officials say they have already tightened controls. For instance, they now require medication records to be reviewed daily by the treating physician and a pharmacist.

In addition, two nurses must now check orders for high-risk drugs, which they can research further on a computer database. A nursing supervisor also must review drug orders each shift.

"We want to get this fixed and have them come back in and say you did a good job," said Dr. Thomas Garthwaite, director of the county Department of Health Services.

The pharmacy is only one area in which federal inspectors have recently found serious flaws. In a Jan. 13 report, they found that King/Drew nurses had been ordered to lie about patients' conditions, failed to give crucial medications prescribed by doctors and left seriously ill patients unattended for hours. The report also said hospital officials failed to fix dangerous lapses after promising to do so.

Federal authorities have accepted the hospital's plan to correct those problems.

"The threat has always been there that the consequence of the hospital not getting its act together could be the loss of federal funding," said county Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky. "Obviously, there's a lot of work being done to try to avoid that and to fix the problems."

County Supervisor Yvonne Brathwaite Burke, whose district includes the hospital, said she worried "constantly" that something new would go wrong at King/Drew.

Burke said she believed that managers had corrected the pharmacy problems. But she said she wasn't confident that top county health officials, who are temporarily running King/Drew's day-to-day operations, would be able to prevent future lapses.

"I'm not sure they're managing it OK," she said.

Burke said the hospital needed a full-time administrator to go department by department, meeting with staff to ferret out brewing problems.

Garthwaite said he hoped to announce an interim chief executive for King/Drew in the next few days. He added, however, that he would not be comfortable until "we sustain a period of time when we do not have bad events?. I won't relax until that happens."
 
this is pretty intense. i am hopeful though that the staff and faculty will acknowledge the significance and pull together to pass inspection. wishing them good luck!

i would also like to point out that c/o 2008 wont be at drew until about 2 years from now...dont you think that many of the problems will be fixed by then?


i also dont think that the 4th year research project is emphasized enough on SDN. research during med school, esp if you have publications (at the least you will for sure have a thesis done, thats required), is great for residency and for fellowships. thoughts?
 
Originally posted by docmemi

i would also like to point out that c/o 2008 wont be at drew until about 2 years from now...dont you think that many of the problems will be fixed by then?

No I don't think that they will. Merely maintaining a large and intense hospital like King County is difficult in itself but to reorganize everything will definitely take a couple of years at least. They have so much to do and the key to change that they have yet to do is to get some new leadership. They got rid of Dr. Francis and that was one BIG positive step but they gotta get some people in there that actually care to take some action and change the order of things there. The current board is just not reliable. The "political hierarchy" needs to change before they can just "snap their fingers" and make some changes. It takes a while and at this point I'm sure no one can estimate how long that will take.
 
ok considering drew's problems came out to the public sometime last year, this years match will mean a lot. if they turn out good and the fact that they will def be in better shape 3 years from now, its a good sign. deal??

when is match day...in March right??
 
Originally posted by docmemi

when is match day...in March right??

This Thursday is match day.
 
Dont a lot of the specialties match early? Optho does for example. Is there any way we can find out if people matched to those already, and where?
 
i can (try to) find out early next week, if not thursday.
 
I don't know about the recent Match results but
here are the match results for Drew/UCLA Class of 2003. I deleted the students names.

Student#1
Residency: St. Agnes Health Care
Program MD
Program: Internal Medicine
Student#2 (Class of 2002)
Residency: University of Wisconsin
Program: Neurosurgery
Student#3
Residency: Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Program: Surgery (Preliminary)
Residency: Martin Luther King/Drew
Medical Center
Program: Radiology-Diagnostic
Student#4
Residency: UCLA Medical Center
Program: Pathology
Student#5
Residency: University of California-
San Francisco
Program: Medicine-Primary/UC
Student#6
Residency: White Memorial Medical
Center
Program: Family Practice
Student#7
Residency: Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
(Transitional Year)
Student#8
Residency: Pomona Valley Hospital
Program: Family Practice
Student#9
Residency: Washington Hospital Center
Program: General Surgery
Student#10
Residency: Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Program: Pediatrics
Student#11 (Class of 2001)
Residency: Martin Luther King/Drew
Medical Center
Program: Radiology
Student#12
Residency: B I Deaconess Medical Center
Program: Internal Medicine
Student#13
Residency: Santa Clara Valley Medical
Center
Program: Obstetrics-Gynecology
Student#14
Residency: University of Southern
California
Program: Internal Medicine
Student#15
Residency: Martin Luther King/Drew
Medical Center
Program: General Surgery (Preliminary)
Residency: Howard University
Program: Ophthalmology
Student#16
Kaiser Permanente-Santa Clara
Obstetrics-Gynecology
Student#17
Residency: Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Program: Pediatrics
Student#18
Residency: Kaiser Permanente-
Los Angeles
Program: Diagnostic Radiology
Student #19
Residency: Martin L King Jr/Drew-CA
Program: Emergency Medicine
Student#20 (Class of 2002)
Residency: State University of New York-
Syracuse
Program: ENT
 
i heard king/drew had the most revenue for the county out of all the county hospitals...one reason to keep it open.
 
Hey Yall:
I inteviewed @ Drew feb 17th and still no word. Has anyone heard anything yet? It's already half way through March and I'm getting anxious on the word ..... input?
peace.
 
Originally posted by tipukhan
Hey Yall:
I inteviewed @ Drew feb 17th and still no word. Has anyone heard anything yet? It's already half way through March and I'm getting anxious on the word ..... input?
peace.

Hey Tipukhan...

I interviewed on Dec 18th and I still have no word from Drew! I know how you feel but at this point...we're just expected to be patient...I guess. 😕
 
Top