Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I have heard it was out, but all I really know is that it now comes with a CD full of images. For those who have seen this book, is it worth getting or does the previous version have most of the same info?
And yes, I know, there have probably been updates in immunohistochemistry and tumor staging, all that stuff that changes weekly, but the appeal of Rosai is more of at the general level to me, morphological descriptions, etc.
I think I am entitled to get one of these surg path textbooks and it will probably be this one but if new Rosai is not significantly different from old rosai I might just get the Sternberg.
BTW, did anyone else know that Ackerman originally wrote his textbook for medical school classes? Amazing that there used to be that much detail and study of pathology during med school. I guess they didn't have to spend so much $#&!ing time dealing with epidemiology, statistics, and cultural diversity. There's about a cumulative month of med school I wish I had back to spend time doing other things.
And yes, I know, there have probably been updates in immunohistochemistry and tumor staging, all that stuff that changes weekly, but the appeal of Rosai is more of at the general level to me, morphological descriptions, etc.
I think I am entitled to get one of these surg path textbooks and it will probably be this one but if new Rosai is not significantly different from old rosai I might just get the Sternberg.
BTW, did anyone else know that Ackerman originally wrote his textbook for medical school classes? Amazing that there used to be that much detail and study of pathology during med school. I guess they didn't have to spend so much $#&!ing time dealing with epidemiology, statistics, and cultural diversity. There's about a cumulative month of med school I wish I had back to spend time doing other things.