Hopefully someone can clear this up for me since I only understand pieces at this point. I'm a D.O. student applying for IM. I applied to both allo and osteo programs and interviewed at both. I'm trying to figure out if I should go allo or osteo. What's the deal with which states require certain accreditation (AOA) and which don't, does being AOA licensed even matter, and what is the deal with Resolution 42?
I applied to programs in both Michigan and NJ. I'd like NOT to do an osteopathic tracking residency where the first year includes rotations other than medicine such as peds, obgyn, surg, etc. if I don't have to. I'd rather just do 3 years of straight medicine like the allopathic programs do. I've heard of some D.O. residents that went allopathic, did their 3 years of medicine and then had to do an extra year to complete an osteopathic internship and I also know some D.O.s that were just able to do 3 years of medicine in an allopathic program with no problem, only I forgot to ask details at the time. Does it just have to do with licenses by state and accrediation? Also, people keep saying if I match with one of the osteopathic programs I'm automatically pulled from the MD match. I was under the assumption that if you matched at a D.O. program(s) you had a certain amount of time to decline that program(s) which would take you out of the DO match but still allow you to continue with the allopathic match. If this were not true than you would have to withdraw from all your DO programs before the osteopathic match even came in order to stay in the MD match, which would stink. I know I asked alot, but after reading around the forum for an hour I couldn't really find straight answers to all my questions. Thanks in advance for any help.