So on AOA's website they talk about their public awareness initiative (a couple of years old). Has anyone seen this in the real world? I just wonder if this effort by the AOA has made any type of impact?
Bump I guess no one else has seen much?
So on AOA's website they talk about their public awareness initiative (a couple of years old). Has anyone seen this in the real world? I just wonder if this effort by the AOA has made any type of impact?
Makes me want to vomit. It's completely embarrassing to our profession.
i even see the next generation of AOA loyalists forming in my class. brainless scum who are absolutely willing to do anything and believe anything in order to have a taste of political "power" in the AOA. it is horrible.
Personally I don't really mind them, I think the design is actually rather pleasant. But I get other people's apprehension, it's a little gimmicky
I cringe every time a DO says something like, "we treat the whole patient!" Or, "we're the only ones that look at structure and how it affects the rest of the body!" At a recent event, one of our faculty was sprinkling these comments around with a lot of MDs in attendance, one of them being the medical director of a hospital that many of our students rotate in. He had a look of utter terror on his face, like, "ARE YOU F'ing KIDDING ME."
Edit: To be fair: I've only ever heard this from school and AOA cheerleaders, never in clinic, etc.
I am recently accepted into osteopathic medical school and new to SDN as well. Is it not true that one of the emphases of osteopathic medical education and osteopathic medicine is a more holistic approach? I'm not being snarky or anything when I ask that, I'm genuinely curious. I know it's what they pitch, but judging by your comment I'm guessing that falls by the wayside once you actually get into the lecture hall.
I am recently accepted into osteopathic medical school and new to SDN as well. Is it not true that one of the emphases of osteopathic medical education and osteopathic medicine is a more holistic approach? I'm not being snarky or anything when I ask that, I'm genuinely curious. I know it's what they pitch, but judging by your comment I'm guessing that falls by the wayside once you actually get into the lecture hall.
I am recently accepted into osteopathic medical school and new to SDN as well. Is it not true that one of the emphases of osteopathic medical education and osteopathic medicine is a more holistic approach? I'm not being snarky or anything when I ask that, I'm genuinely curious. I know it's what they pitch, but judging by your comment I'm guessing that falls by the wayside once you actually get into the lecture hall.
There are about 7 of these posters around my area including bus stop boards, bus boards, and billboards. My MD attendings had a good laugh toward them whereas my DO friends think that this campaign was a great idea.![]()
It's just like any DO thread...kinda get old after a whileYeah I think we all expected this thread to go in a "certain" direction...
With all the DO bias that exists with getting into more competitive specialties, wouldn't it be a good idea to go to bat for your students and adhere to a universal standard of accreditation so that your students might be able to get better spots? Thus reflecting more positively on the school and DOs as a whole?All this does is create awkwardness between us and MDs. If anything, us osteopathic students should push for the absorption and/or destruction of COCA by the LCME.
All this does is create awkwardness between us and MDs. If anything, us osteopathic students should push for the absorption and/or destruction of COCA by the LCME.
With all the DO bias that exists with getting into more competitive specialties, wouldn't it be a good idea to go to bat for your students and adhere to a universal standard of accreditation so that your students might be able to get better spots? Thus reflecting more positively on the school and DOs as a whole?
God you are self righteous for a pre med. This perpetuation of bull**** is not good for the reputation of DOs. It makes us look like dishonest snake oil salesmen. No one cares about what topics you feel SDN should or should not lend credence to.Leave it up to sdn to get worked about something stupid. If anything substantive comes of this campaign, I'll be surprised.
God you are self righteous for a pre med. This perpetuation of bull**** is not good for the reputation of DOs. It makes us look like dishonest snake oil salesmen. No one cares about what topics you feel SDN should or should not lend credence to.
Triggered? Ad hom out of nowhere. What's that about?God you are self righteous for a pre med. This perpetuation of bull**** is not good for the reputation of DOs. It makes us look like dishonest snake oil salesmen. No one cares about what topics you feel SDN should or should not lend credence to.
Triggered? Ad hom out of nowhere. What's that about?
Since you don't care to hear my perspective because I'm a premed ... I'll share it anyway. Fek off.
I don't see that this cute little add campaign is some undermining of the validity of the DO degree. It's a bit silly, but I don't see how it could ever be legitimately interpreted as being as bad as people are making it out to be.
The intended target is the general population that don't know about the profession. No more, no less.. It's not to win over MDs or make DOs feel better about themselves.
Show the ad to someone that don't know about the profession or not in the health field and ask them what they think. That would be a better way to gauge its effectiveness.
The DO degree and OMT will probably survive, but the philosophy won't.
The philosophy is already kind of well accepted elsewhere in medicine.Meh, this kind of nonsense from the AOA will be the nail in the coffin for them. The day of reckoning is coming where most DOs would rather be aligned with their MD colleagues and with the merger of GME it wouldn't surprise me within the next 15-20 years we see undergraduate medical education merged under the LCME umbrella as well. The DO degree and OMT will probably survive, but the philosophy won't.
Hmm they will probably require all DO students to be in the AOA and pay dues and then after starting residency most will drop their membership. I see the AOA losing tons of money as they currently essentially force physicians to pay dues in order to be board certified if they did a AOA residency. That will no longer be a requirement and the AOA is going to lose out on a lot of cash. I'm sure they are just hoping that people will keep up their dues after graduating medical school, but that's just not going to happen. I got so many threatening letters in the mail during my intern year it was bordering on harassment.
Let me rephrase - the AOA believes DOs have a stranglehold on the "whole body" holistic approach to medical practice. The seperate but equal mentality of the AOA should - and most likely will - disappear with the new generation of DOs.The philosophy is already kind of well accepted elsewhere in medicine.
Tone doesn't translate well in text. You're overestimating my emotional involvement.Triggered? Ad hom out of nowhere. What's that about?
Since you don't care to hear my perspective because I'm a premed ... I'll share it anyway. Fek off.
I don't see that this cute little ad campaign is some undermining of the validity of the DO degree. It's a bit silly, but I don't see how it could ever be legitimately interpreted as being as bad as people are making it out to be.
Let me rephrase - the AOA believes DOs have a stranglehold on the "whole body" holistic approach to medical practice. The seperate but equal mentality of the AOA should - and most likely will - disappear with the new generation of DOs.
Just goes to show that not all criticism of the AOA is valid. There are some who would literally criticize the AOA for doing anything at all other than destroying itself and working to eliminate DOs from existence.All this does is create awkwardness between us and MDs. If anything, us osteopathic students should push for the absorption and/or destruction of COCA by the LCME.
Could you point out which ad asserts that DOs are "better" (your word) than MDs?Instead of making claims about how D.O.s are better...how about just try and make the public aware that D.O.s exist. Trying to say that D.O.s are "better" than M.D. because they "look at the whole person" is a little ridiculous. All this campaign is doing is making the situation worse and it's honestly a little embarrassing.
I'm pretty sure by saying, "we view the patient as a whole" and all the other cliche phrases that are said at interviews at D.O. schools are aimed at comparing D.O. and M.D. The only reason you would make those statements are to show a difference between yourself and another group.Could you point out which ad asserts that DOs are "better" (your word) than MDs?
That's a big assumption. Saying "I care about this person" doesn't mean that "you don't care about this person".I'm pretty sure by saying, "we view the patient as a whole" and all the other cliche phrases that are said at interviews at D.O. schools are aimed at comparing D.O. and M.D. The only reason you would make those statements are to show a difference between yourself and another group.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile app