- Joined
- Feb 27, 2009
- Messages
- 150
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey everyone, I recently decided on pre-Med and just joined this site, so this is my first time posting. I apologize if this is in the wrong forum, but it looked like the best fit to me.
I came into college with about 30 units of AP/CLEP credit, including both calc BC (calc 1 and 2) and physics B (the one without calc). My adviser told me that most schools, save those in California, will accept AP credit so long as I take upper division courses in the same department. I've decided to forgo upper division physics, so I'm just going to retake the intro class.
My question is this: given that I will be using calc BC credit to fulfill my math requirements (although I will probably also take stats) would it be more wise to take calc based physics, even though it is not fully in line with the material covered on the MCAT, just to elucidate my background in calc? The other option is to take regular intro physics, which I have already taken with AP, and cruise through it. I'd rather go with this option, but do you think it would show weakness in the math department?
I came into college with about 30 units of AP/CLEP credit, including both calc BC (calc 1 and 2) and physics B (the one without calc). My adviser told me that most schools, save those in California, will accept AP credit so long as I take upper division courses in the same department. I've decided to forgo upper division physics, so I'm just going to retake the intro class.
My question is this: given that I will be using calc BC credit to fulfill my math requirements (although I will probably also take stats) would it be more wise to take calc based physics, even though it is not fully in line with the material covered on the MCAT, just to elucidate my background in calc? The other option is to take regular intro physics, which I have already taken with AP, and cruise through it. I'd rather go with this option, but do you think it would show weakness in the math department?