Application Advice From a Program Director

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

OphthoPD

New Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have been reviewing Ophthalmology Residency applications for many years and there are some serious recurring problems with many them. Herewith are some suggestions to avoid those blemishes.

1) Know how to spell your chosen specialty. I can sense many of your eyes rolling but believe it or not, at least one app to our program each year has it misspelled. Need I say how that gets interpreted by the reviewer?

2) Follow directions: when the app asks to list your education in chronological order with the most recent first, it means just that. Even though the reviewer will still get the necessary information, it lets him or her know that this applicant does not pay attention to detail, which is not becoming to a potential resident.

3) Don't leave any significant gaps. If you took some time off (for any reason) between or after schools, make sure it's accounted for in the employment history or at least somewhere else in the application. No, we don't have to hear about the post-graduate backpacking trip for two months to Europe, but you will lose "points" if the reviewer has to work to assure him or herself that you weren't a guest of the government in Leavenworth or somewhere like that.

4) Email accounts are cheap enough; if you have a real "cutie" for your everyday email address, get a more standard-sounding one for the application.

If I think of any others I'll re-post; best of luck to all of you!
 
[email protected] here applying for Optamology!

Seriously though, thanks for the PD tips! If you have time to post on the recent thread about personal statements or post some PS tips here I'm sure there would be some very thankful applicants, too.
 
This is great advice, but taking it a step further, the SF match app is pretty terrible compared to ERAS. Why it is still a paper app anyway? I think ophtho should seriously consider an electronic format.
 
Top