Slippery Pete said:
D.O students are so clueless. but, i guess that's good in a way. someone has to be suckered into a practice that was based on false pretenses and lacks even a shred of credible research to back it up.
u need to wake up to reality little man
👎
(or at least read up on the founding of osteopathy)
First off, let me say that this post in no way is meant to perpetuate the "DO v. MD" issue. It is meant to quell ignorance. With that being said......
Wouldn't it be really ignorant of me to make a bold statement like: MSSM pre-med students are apparently clueless? I hope you don't represent your future medical school nor do I hope you represent the whole allopathic world. Thankfully, I know that you don't.
What exactly is a "practice based on false pretenses?" Practice of what? Medicine? I got news for you pal, when I treat my patients, I do it the same way my MD counterparts do. When I give an ACE inhibitor to my patients with heart failure, I do it the same as everyone else, DO or MD or whatever. I read the HOPE trial too. That has to do with the standard of care, regardless of degree or philosophy in treatment.
If you are referring to osteopathic manipulation when you say "false pretenses", then you clearly show that you have NO clue about what it means to be an osteopathic physician. I agree that there is a dearth of research, but there IS some out there that exists. I will admit that the studies are small w/o a lot of power, but they are still credible. Look it up. Most DOs don't practice OMT. Whether you like it or not, DOs and MDs are more similar than different.
So you tell OSUdoc to look up the history behind the founding of Osteopathy? That's a laugh. Your whole post is an oxymoron. Clearly it is YOU that should not only read up on it, but also the state of medical practice in the late 19th century as well as evolution of both allopathic and osteopathic medicine. I would also suggest you do some research on the Flexner Report. Clearly things have changed drastically in the last 95 years. Also look into Rockefeller's financial influence that occurred as a result. Clearly you are in no way knowledgeable. You should study up yourself before you tell others to do such a thing.
And finally, there are only three reasons that I can think of to become a MD versus a DO: 1) you have a desire to practice in another country where the US trained DO degree is not recognized 2) you desire to do an extremely competative residency at a prarochial institution [i.e. neurosurgery at harvard or hopkins] and 3) you REALLY could never see yourself as a DO for whatever reason. Point is this - whatever type of degree you choose for yourself is your business. There is no need to douche on anyone else, especially when you are uninformed.