- Joined
- Aug 8, 2015
- Messages
- 261
- Reaction score
- 167
Example: 500+ shadowing hours when ≈200 is excellent with a broad spectrum of specialties of course. Just curious.
Are overkills in your application harmful?
- Thread starter AlfonsTheGuru
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2015
- Messages
- 88
- Reaction score
- 55
I think it would depend on the context.
There are boundaries to shadowing/clinical observation.
Rule of thumb:
Quality > Quantity
There are boundaries to shadowing/clinical observation.
Rule of thumb:
Quality > Quantity
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2010
- Messages
- 74,812
- Reaction score
- 120,019
To me, it says that one doesn't know what's important in this process.
It's lethal when people think that something like that is all that's required. For example, I've seen posts here from people who think that shadowing is volunteering, or that it qualifies as telling them what they're getting into (which it doesn't)
The most common form of "overload" is tons of research and little to no clinical and/or volunteer activity.
It's lethal when people think that something like that is all that's required. For example, I've seen posts here from people who think that shadowing is volunteering, or that it qualifies as telling them what they're getting into (which it doesn't)
The most common form of "overload" is tons of research and little to no clinical and/or volunteer activity.
D
deleted407021
500 hours folding towels <<< 500 hours scribing, working directly with patients or working some management position, etc.
