- Joined
- Jan 12, 2017
- Messages
- 907
- Reaction score
- 882
Anyone know when the LTHET results will be released?
It's not my year to apply. I'm just curious to see who is selected for what so I can pick their brainRumor has it, early next week. What did you apply for?
They usually post it on the military dentistry fb page congratulating everyone but it’s not postedJust saw they posted but I am a dental student and cannot see it, can someone share the document here?
For whatever reason they put it behind a CAC enabled website, maybe privacy idk. It should not be posted here publicly without permission. If you’re HPSP and don’t have a CAC yet this is one of many reasons to fix that situation. It was encouraging though to see so many junior officers selected, specialty training especially Bravo isn’t being treated like a glide path to easy retirement as it has been previouslyJust saw they posted but I am a dental student and cannot see it, can someone share the document here?
What website is it posted on? I have a CAC but have never logged onto any websitesFor whatever reason they put it behind a CAC enabled website, maybe privacy idk. It should not be posted here publicly without permission. If you’re HPSP and don’t have a CAC yet this is one of many reasons to fix that situation. It was encouraging though to see so many junior officers selected, specialty training especially Bravo isn’t being treated like a glide path to easy retirement as it has been previously
It's very surprising that 3 got endo straight out of school. I think there were several CPTs and MAJs who are on the alternate list. I gave up on trying to figure out what goes into boards decision. I was told that I should complete CCC, Air Assault or Airborne, EFMB, and take on several leadership positions to be considered for specialty programs.Apparently 3 DS got OMS and 3 DS got endo. I'm pretty surprised that many dental students went straight into Endo
I’m unable to view the results. Someone told me they want to give it to younger officers in hopes they’ll stay in longerIt's very surprising that 3 got endo straight out of school. I think there were several CPTs and MAJs who are on the alternate list. I gave up on trying to figure out what goes into boards decision. I was told that I should complete CCC, Air Assault or Airborne, EFMB, and take on several leadership positions to be considered for specialty programs.
That would make sense for the Army, let's reward people with the least amount of experience.I’m unable to view the results. Someone told me they want to give it to younger officers in hopes they’ll stay in longer
Interesting take, how about ‘no’.That would make sense for the Army, let's reward people with the least amount of experience.
I would think farther along officers are also just not able to switch back to a rigorous student way of life as easyInteresting take, how about ‘no’.
Let’s unpack this:
Are you advocating “rewarding” seniority with residency slots? We see the strongest residents coming straight out of school, that’s certainly how the civilian world works. We also have the ability to possibly retain them longer and certainly at lower cost (rank) when they’re junior officers.
Should people who were previously unselected/uncompetitive and are now farther out from organized academics and thus less likely to succeed in residency be favored due to what… cronyism, years spent doing the bend & reach, perpetuating the military culture of low expectations? The Army doesn’t give a **** about people - never has and never will - it’s all about the mission. Usually 9 times out of 10 the military makes illogical decisions but this is not one of them.
For too long we saw the bravo program being used not to mint “super dentists” but to perpetuate the military welfare culture of creating a glide path for senior officers who otherwise wouldn’t (and definitely shouldn’t) to make COL and retire on a bigger pension. These are the same people who then go on to not use their skills in favor of retiring shortly after residency, taking leadership slots, or worst of all doing the TJC “fellowship”.
I have next to no faith in the competence of this organization but Army made a good decision in accepting so many 2LTs and CPTs - whether by accident, luck, or simply being an exception to the rule this was a good move for the Army, our patients and our taxpayers
I'm not advocating for anything, I just find it unlikely that selecting 2LTs coming out of school will aid in retention. In fact it makes it even more likely they would submit a UQR packet sooner since they have less time invested. It's when you start approaching 8-10 years that you need to make difficult decisions whether to stay in or not.Interesting take, how about ‘no’.
Let’s unpack this:
Are you advocating “rewarding” seniority with residency slots? We see the strongest residents coming straight out of school, that’s certainly how the civilian world works. We also have the ability to possibly retain them longer and certainly at lower cost (rank) when they’re junior officers.
Should people who were previously unselected/uncompetitive and are now farther out from organized academics and thus less likely to succeed in residency be favored due to what… cronyism, years spent doing the bend & reach, perpetuating the military culture of low expectations? The Army doesn’t give a **** about people - never has and never will - it’s all about the mission. Usually 9 times out of 10 the military makes illogical decisions but this is not one of them.
For too long we saw the bravo program being used not to mint “super dentists” but to perpetuate the military welfare culture of creating a glide path for senior officers who otherwise wouldn’t (and definitely shouldn’t) to make COL and retire on a bigger pension. These are the same people who then go on to not use their skills in favor of retiring shortly after residency, taking leadership slots, or worst of all doing the TJC “fellowship”.
I have next to no faith in the competence of this organization but Army made a good decision in accepting so many 2LTs and CPTs - whether by accident, luck, or simply being an exception to the rule this was a good move for the Army, our patients and our taxpayers
If they would allow specialists to moonlight more days and supplement their incomes, I bet they'd be more likely to stay.I'm not advocating for anything, I just find it unlikely that selecting 2LTs coming out of school will aid in retention. In fact it makes it even more likely they would submit a UQR packet sooner since they have less time invested. It's when you start approaching 8-10 years that you need to make difficult decisions whether to stay in or not.
I'm all for selecting CPTs which have completed an AEGD, completed CCC, or otherwise shown a commitment to the Army. Pick the most highly qualified, regardless of rank.
The Army is really bad at clearly outlining what its goals/objectives are.I'm not advocating for anything, I just find it unlikely that selecting 2LTs coming out of school will aid in retention. In fact it makes it even more likely they would submit a UQR packet sooner since they have less time invested. It's when you start approaching 8-10 years that you need to make difficult decisions whether to stay in or not.
I'm all for selecting CPTs which have completed an AEGD, completed CCC, or otherwise shown a commitment to the Army. Pick the most highly qualified, regardless of rank.