- Joined
- May 8, 2012
- Messages
- 647
- Reaction score
- 435
Published recently in Lancet, presented at AHA ReSS today by the senior author, Yannopoulos (free PDF here).
Obviously the Minnesota system has been building towards this trial for years, with a ton of leg work obtaining institutional buy in and in the prehospital arena getting their EMS systems trained. Small trial (N=30), but huge effect size - survival to discharge in early ECMO arm >40% compared to 6% in standard ACLS group. Stopped early due to posterior Bayesian probability randomization design, which I can't pretend to totally understand...
Anyone have prehospital ECMO activations in place for favorable patients (young, witnessed, VF/VT, etc.)? Our system has a rough protocol in place, but we have only had 3-4 activations in the first 6 months in a major metropolitan area.
Plus their metrics are insane - mean time from 911 call to cannulation <60 min?! I definitely wonder if this is achievable in other systems.
Obviously the Minnesota system has been building towards this trial for years, with a ton of leg work obtaining institutional buy in and in the prehospital arena getting their EMS systems trained. Small trial (N=30), but huge effect size - survival to discharge in early ECMO arm >40% compared to 6% in standard ACLS group. Stopped early due to posterior Bayesian probability randomization design, which I can't pretend to totally understand...
Anyone have prehospital ECMO activations in place for favorable patients (young, witnessed, VF/VT, etc.)? Our system has a rough protocol in place, but we have only had 3-4 activations in the first 6 months in a major metropolitan area.
Plus their metrics are insane - mean time from 911 call to cannulation <60 min?! I definitely wonder if this is achievable in other systems.