ASC Safety

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Aether2000

algosdoc
20+ Year Member
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
4,240
Reaction score
2,300
Based on 7 years of doing locums in 20+ surgery centers, I have observations (not complaints) about the potential safety issues in surgery centers compared to hospitals. Although the performance of procedures in surgery centers has a good safety profile, with expansion of surgeries to include cardiac caths and interventional cardiac procedures, 4 level cervical discectomies, multisystem disease, and BMI patients >45, the risks appear to becoming more significant, both surgically and from the anesthetic standpoint.

Whereas many surgeons would not consider scheduling advanced surgical procedures or sicker patients in surgery centers, some (especially those with PAs that do the entire preop evaluation and schedule them at ASCs at the direction of the surgeon who may have never met the patient nor reviewed the chart until 10 minutes prior to the performance of the operation) will routinely schedule everything at the surgery center then will see what sticks. Others are insistent on performing the surgery at "their" center regardless of the risk, and will call the system medical director to override anesthesiologists that get in their way, or will replace the entire anesthesia group if there is any pushback for patient safety. Furthermore, preop info about patients is sketchy at best since ASCs generally neither have their own EMR nor can link to a hospital EMR. Patients may show up with a litany of issues they only half remember.

Surgical equipment may not be present the day of surgery and therefore the surgeon may "jerry-rig" a surgery, using equipment and implants in ways they are neither designed nor approved to be used. When the sterilization system for equipment is down, the sterilized trays may be brought from another surgery center in the back of a car, and contaminated trays have been used. One surgery performed an entire ACDF without surgical prep. Standard anesthesia equipment or medications may be completely missing, such as nerve stimulators, videolaryngoscopy, pressors, calcium channel blockers, sugammadex in centers that routinely use NMB by surgeon demand until the end of surgery (No Twitches!) and have rapid turnaround, temperature monitoring equipment or strips, and may frequently run out of oxygen or one medication after another. One admin refused to allow ephedrine at her center because it was "too expensive". At times, sevoflurane in the vaporizer must be used with very low flows given the shipment of sevo did not arrive and there are no other vaporizers or agents available. Temperature control of the centers may be non-existent with 85 degree F surgeries being performed with the walls sweating or 60 degree ORs when temperature control is being handled 1000 miles away. Water traps may be taped over and over to keep them from falling apart when it takes 3 months to acquire replacements. OR machines may be as old as Narcomed 2b, and in one OR I saw an Ohio machine. One center has an oxygen leak inside the walls, and this has existed for 6 months without repair. Another center refuses to have backup O2 tanks on the anesthesia machine, with the admin stating they are in a storage room just down the hall. Air may not be available in surgery centers performing procedures on the face and in the oropharynx. Another had mold growing inside and outside the walls and on the floors after flooding occurred. Startup centers are particularly problematic, and when anesthesiologists are assigned the night before, cannot check out the center that may have one laryngoscope blade for the enter center, and return tubing to the bag having damage preventing pressurization of the circuit. And if these sick patients get into trouble during surgery needing blood (sorry, ASCs do not carry blood nor can they get blood before the patient bleeds out), A-line, FFP, platelets, CVLs or rapid infusion systems, they are out of luck. Some surgery centers do not carry microdrip infusion tubing nor have more than one syringe pump for the entire center. Some have neither vein finders nor ultrasounds to assist with IV access in chemo patients and the dehydrated.

Running a code in a surgery center is particularly fun when using ancient defibrillators that may not have a functioning battery, inability to obtain ABGs, electrolytes, or H&H using skeleton staff and surgeons that are unfamiliar with causes or treatment of EMD/Cardiac arrest.

Surgeons also push the boundaries of what procedures they perform at the surgery center. Since they are on the board of directors, they may approve procedures for themselves for which they have no training at all, and use the rep to guide them through the procedure. Others simply engage in fraud, performing an ACDF, RF neurotomy and stem cell injection all at the same level on cases sent to them by lawyers to maximize the cost and drama of how bad the injury was since it required all these procedures. Some surgeons will bring young pediatric patients to surgery centers that have had no peds patients in a decade, with the staff lacking the experience to be handling these patients intraop or post op.

Given that a surgery center may have 10 different anesthesiologists/CRNAs over 5 days, there may be no consistency in enforcement of surgery center policies nor in patient selection.

Have others had similar observations making them question surgery center safety?

Members don't see this ad.
 
The legal team I have discussed ASC with all say this

1. As long as standard equipment is available at the ASC (video scopes, fiber optic, mh carts) for standard outpatient procedure

Than ASC are legally not held liable

That’s from attorney speak

Saying all this the asa and surgeons are very vague to set real standards such as bmi for stand a lone ASC. For one reason: money

It is up to individual medical directors to setup guidelines for the centers

1. Bmi is huge problem. You center needs to set a bmi limit for procedures and stick to it (our bmi is hard bmi 45 cut off)
2. Patients with mental health disorders like Down syndrome or combative disorder, need to set guidelines whether they are appropriate
3. Pediatrics patients. Again set some standard what is age cutoff
 
The legal team I have discussed ASC with all say this

1. As long as standard equipment is available at the ASC (video scopes, fiber optic, mh carts) for standard outpatient procedure

Than ASC are legally not held liable

That’s from attorney speak

Saying all this the asa and surgeons are very vague to set real standards such as bmi for stand a lone ASC. For one reason: money

It is up to individual medical directors to setup guidelines for the centers

1. Bmi is huge problem. You center needs to set a bmi limit for procedures and stick to it (our bmi is hard bmi 45 cut off)
2. Patients with mental health disorders like Down syndrome or combative disorder, need to set guidelines whether they are appropriate
3. Pediatrics patients. Again set some standard what is age cutoff
Unfortunately, locums have little input as to standards. One ASC has had 5 anesthesia groups over the past 4 years. Locums are neither investors nor medical directors, and are just passing through a number of surgery centers that largely establish increasingly flexible standards based on surgeons desire to do all cases in surgery centers.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Unfortunately, locums have little input as to standards. One ASC has had 5 anesthesia groups over the past 4 years. Locums are neither investors nor medical directors, and are just passing through a number of surgery centers that largely establish increasingly flexible standards based on surgeons desire to do all cases in surgery centers.
U have input!

You leave as locums if u aren’t happy.
 
Biggest question I have is how the hell does anyone get through 40 GI procedures in a day if one is actually "pre-oping" (spelling?) correctly and not just shuffling people through?
 
Biggest question I have is how the hell does anyone get through 40 GI procedures in a day if one is actually "pre-oping" (spelling?) correctly and not just shuffling people through?
I have covered 4 rooms
1 room peds ent tonsils ear tubes (7-10)
1 room eyeballs (30)
2 rooms gi (40-60 a day)

ASC ran 6a-7pm many days.

Probably the crappest ASC i ever covered in late 2016-2017

I did it because the market sucked back than

Preop all those patients on an iPad as well

A lot of trust in the crna. Had to call ambulance a few times to transport to hospital.

Probably worst ASC I have ever covered and thus I rarely cover those type of ASC again.

Most gi preop i saw one day by myself was 68 in that center.

The gi doc ran two shifts. 6a-12p. And second wave of of gi docs came 1230-6pm.
 
Adapt. Payers will drive patients to ascs for lower costs and it’s one of the few ways surgeons can make more money these days.

Covid showed that 85 year old total joints could be done in acs and cardiac data also supports the move to ascs.

Just one example but we’ve been doing bmis of 55 for shoulder scopes in ASCs for a few years now. We just schedule them first case. To be fair they don’t have terrible hearts or lungs and younger but we’ve realized that bmi is only one criteria. The data often doesn’t support moving these cases.

Adapt or don’t work there. There are obviously many places to work. Let supply demand take its course. Enough demand and too many anesthesiologists like you and the problem will take care of itself.
 
Adapt. Payers will drive patients to ascs for lower costs and it’s one of the few ways surgeons can make more money these days.

Covid showed that 85 year old total joints could be done in acs and cardiac data also supports the move to ascs.

Just one example but we’ve been doing bmis of 55 for shoulder scopes in ASCs for a few years now. We just schedule them first case. To be fair they don’t have terrible hearts or lungs and younger but we’ve realized that bmi is only one criteria. The data often doesn’t support moving these cases.

Adapt or don’t work there. There are obviously many places to work. Let supply demand take its course. Enough demand and too many anesthesiologists like you and the problem will take care of itself.


Guess I’m not desperate enough to adapt. I’m sure you can get away with it most of the time but I’m not doing any 55 BMIs at a freestanding surgicenter. If I had a loved one who was 55 bmi, no way I’d let them have a procedure at a surgicenter. Seems like in some areas of the country, we have lost control of our own specialty or sold control in exchange for money.
 
Last edited:
This is why I hide in high volume heart and vascular centers. I’ve worked in community hospitals taking care of extremely ill patients and had no access to the kind of drugs or equipment most people leaving training would consider necessary for safety .

And I hated it.
 
This is why I hide in high volume heart and vascular centers. I’ve worked in community hospitals taking care of extremely ill patients and had no access to the kind of drugs or equipment most people leaving training would consider necessary for safety .

And I hated it.
Hospitals should have everything, as they take care of the stuff that ASCs won't.

ASCs just need the basics
 
Adapt. Payers will drive patients to ascs for lower costs and it’s one of the few ways surgeons can make more money these days.

Covid showed that 85 year old total joints could be done in acs and cardiac data also supports the move to ascs.

Just one example but we’ve been doing bmis of 55 for shoulder scopes in ASCs for a few years now. We just schedule them first case. To be fair they don’t have terrible hearts or lungs and younger but we’ve realized that bmi is only one criteria. The data often doesn’t support moving these cases.

Adapt or don’t work there. There are obviously many places to work. Let supply demand take its course. Enough demand and too many anesthesiologists like you and the problem will take care of itself.


Those two examples sound like bad ideas.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
The OPs situation sounds just terrible, and I can’t imagine continuing to work in a place where medication’s and supplies are available so tenuously. our group staffs a couple of surgery centers and a couple of Plastics offices, and even there, the quality of supplies and equipment is good. I work locum at an outside surgery center, and they are certainly receptive to locum’s physicians opinions about safety and supplies, but to be honest, they don’t really need to up their game. Regarding patient selection criteria, I am with Aneftp; somewhere there has to be a written piece of paper that says what the criteria are, and somebody needs to stand up for themselves and enforce it. It may be interpersonally difficult to say no, but it’s not like they can force you to do the case.
 
The OPs situation sounds just terrible, and I can’t imagine continuing to work in a place where medication’s and supplies are available so tenuously. our group staffs a couple of surgery centers and a couple of Plastics offices, and even there, the quality of supplies and equipment is good. I work locum at an outside surgery center, and they are certainly receptive to locum’s physicians opinions about safety and supplies, but to be honest, they don’t really need to up their game. Regarding patient selection criteria, I am with Aneftp; somewhere there has to be a written piece of paper that says what the criteria are, and somebody needs to stand up for themselves and enforce it. It may be interpersonally difficult to say no, but it’s not like they can force you to do the case.


I worked at one of those. Published exclusion criteria routinely ignored, making for very difficult situations. BMI 58 for elective shoulder replacement, 90 year old for total shoulder replacement with a recent failed stress test, nonfasted morbidly obese for elective TKA. Pulmonary HTN for a total shoulder, 20+ allergy morbidly obese for an elextive joint? Oh man I don't miss those encounters.

No, the orthos won't see your concerns as valid. They will run to admin and scream murder.

Told them I won't do an unfasted mac spinal for a morbidly obese TKA, they cussed me out and tried with 2 other anesthesiologists. Both said no. They kept shopping it until they found someone willing to do it under those conditions. Orthos felt vindicated when nothing untoward happened.

Patient selection criteria is cool, but is it enforced?
 
I worked at one of those. Published exclusion criteria routinely ignored, making for very difficult situations. BMI 58 for elective shoulder replacement, 90 year old for total shoulder replacement with a recent failed stress test, nonfasted morbidly obese for elective TKA. Pulmonary HTN for a total shoulder, 20+ allergy morbidly obese for an elextive joint? Oh man I don't miss those encounters.

No, the orthos won't see your concerns as valid. They will run to admin and scream murder.

Told them I won't do an unfasted mac spinal for a morbidly obese TKA, they cussed me out and tried with 2 other anesthesiologists. Both said no. They kept shopping it until they found someone willing to do it under those conditions. Orthos felt vindicated when nothing untoward happened.

Patient selection criteria is cool, but is it enforced?
Sounds like a bad anesthesia culture.
 
Told them I won't do an unfasted mac spinal for a morbidly obese TKA, they cussed me out and tried with 2 other anesthesiologists. Both said no. They kept shopping it until they found someone willing to do it under those conditions. Orthos felt vindicated when nothing untoward happened.
I hate it when anesthesiologists do that to each other.

The group should work on educating or getting rid of the collaborateur. That shouldn't be tolerated.

If a partner cancels a case, it's canceled. If surgeons are dumb and unprofessional enough to go shopping, partners should (1) not undermine their partners, and (2) aggressively tell surgeons not to play that game.
 
I hate it when anesthesiologists do that to each other.

The group should work on educating or getting rid of the collaborateur. That shouldn't be tolerated.

If a partner cancels a case, it's canceled. If surgeons are dumb and unprofessional enough to go shopping, partners should (1) not undermine their partners, and (2) aggressively tell surgeons not to play that game.
Yeah that guy is a scumbag.
 
Based on 7 years of doing locums in 20+ surgery centers, I have observations (not complaints) about the potential safety issues in surgery centers compared to hospitals. Although the performance of procedures in surgery centers has a good safety profile, with expansion of surgeries to include cardiac caths and interventional cardiac procedures, 4 level cervical discectomies, multisystem disease, and BMI patients >45, the risks appear to becoming more significant, both surgically and from the anesthetic standpoint.

Whereas many surgeons would not consider scheduling advanced surgical procedures or sicker patients in surgery centers, some (especially those with PAs that do the entire preop evaluation and schedule them at ASCs at the direction of the surgeon who may have never met the patient nor reviewed the chart until 10 minutes prior to the performance of the operation) will routinely schedule everything at the surgery center then will see what sticks. Others are insistent on performing the surgery at "their" center regardless of the risk, and will call the system medical director to override anesthesiologists that get in their way, or will replace the entire anesthesia group if there is any pushback for patient safety. Furthermore, preop info about patients is sketchy at best since ASCs generally neither have their own EMR nor can link to a hospital EMR. Patients may show up with a litany of issues they only half remember.

Surgical equipment may not be present the day of surgery and therefore the surgeon may "jerry-rig" a surgery, using equipment and implants in ways they are neither designed nor approved to be used. When the sterilization system for equipment is down, the sterilized trays may be brought from another surgery center in the back of a car, and contaminated trays have been used. One surgery performed an entire ACDF without surgical prep. Standard anesthesia equipment or medications may be completely missing, such as nerve stimulators, videolaryngoscopy, pressors, calcium channel blockers, sugammadex in centers that routinely use NMB by surgeon demand until the end of surgery (No Twitches!) and have rapid turnaround, temperature monitoring equipment or strips, and may frequently run out of oxygen or one medication after another. One admin refused to allow ephedrine at her center because it was "too expensive". At times, sevoflurane in the vaporizer must be used with very low flows given the shipment of sevo did not arrive and there are no other vaporizers or agents available. Temperature control of the centers may be non-existent with 85 degree F surgeries being performed with the walls sweating or 60 degree ORs when temperature control is being handled 1000 miles away. Water traps may be taped over and over to keep them from falling apart when it takes 3 months to acquire replacements. OR machines may be as old as Narcomed 2b, and in one OR I saw an Ohio machine. One center has an oxygen leak inside the walls, and this has existed for 6 months without repair. Another center refuses to have backup O2 tanks on the anesthesia machine, with the admin stating they are in a storage room just down the hall. Air may not be available in surgery centers performing procedures on the face and in the oropharynx. Another had mold growing inside and outside the walls and on the floors after flooding occurred. Startup centers are particularly problematic, and when anesthesiologists are assigned the night before, cannot check out the center that may have one laryngoscope blade for the enter center, and return tubing to the bag having damage preventing pressurization of the circuit. And if these sick patients get into trouble during surgery needing blood (sorry, ASCs do not carry blood nor can they get blood before the patient bleeds out), A-line, FFP, platelets, CVLs or rapid infusion systems, they are out of luck. Some surgery centers do not carry microdrip infusion tubing nor have more than one syringe pump for the entire center. Some have neither vein finders nor ultrasounds to assist with IV access in chemo patients and the dehydrated.

Running a code in a surgery center is particularly fun when using ancient defibrillators that may not have a functioning battery, inability to obtain ABGs, electrolytes, or H&H using skeleton staff and surgeons that are unfamiliar with causes or treatment of EMD/Cardiac arrest.

Surgeons also push the boundaries of what procedures they perform at the surgery center. Since they are on the board of directors, they may approve procedures for themselves for which they have no training at all, and use the rep to guide them through the procedure. Others simply engage in fraud, performing an ACDF, RF neurotomy and stem cell injection all at the same level on cases sent to them by lawyers to maximize the cost and drama of how bad the injury was since it required all these procedures. Some surgeons will bring young pediatric patients to surgery centers that have had no peds patients in a decade, with the staff lacking the experience to be handling these patients intraop or post op.

Given that a surgery center may have 10 different anesthesiologists/CRNAs over 5 days, there may be no consistency in enforcement of surgery center policies nor in patient selection.

Have others had similar observations making them question surgery center safety?
Worked at 5 different surg centers and the last one was fairly out of control. Was one of the reasons I switched jobs. Asa 4s daily. Surgeon doesn’t have hospital privileges and schedules every case at surg center. Push back from ortho who wants that facility fee on the bmi 48 difficult airway that I cancelled. Some sketchy stuff going on. Filthy guy (homeless?) for acdf and the lawyer is driving him home late at night two counties away. What is going on here? Oh, and the video scope is glidescope rip off that fogs up and can make a difficult airway damn near impossible.
 
I hate it when anesthesiologists do that to each other.

The group should work on educating or getting rid of the collaborateur. That shouldn't be tolerated.

If a partner cancels a case, it's canceled. If surgeons are dumb and unprofessional enough to go shopping, partners should (1) not undermine their partners, and (2) aggressively tell surgeons not to play that game.
Depends a bit

Some are notorious for cancelling cases for nonsense reasons. K 5.6 in a dialysis patient...wants cardiac clearance for a hip fx just because patient is old..high BMI in an ASC..and recently with the GLP1 because they are 6 days out and not 7

Especially if it's an addon, late afternoon case, etc.
 
Depends a bit

Some are notorious for cancelling cases for nonsense reasons. K 5.6 in a dialysis patient...wants cardiac clearance for a hip fx just because patient is old..high BMI in an ASC..and recently with the GLP1 because they are 6 days out and not 7

Especially if it's an addon, late afternoon case, etc.


How high of a BMI?

At ours, we go to 45. Any higher in an ASC seems risky.
 
Depends a bit

Some are notorious for cancelling cases for nonsense reasons. K 5.6 in a dialysis patient...wants cardiac clearance for a hip fx just because patient is old..high BMI in an ASC..and recently with the GLP1 because they are 6 days out and not 7

Especially if it's an addon, late afternoon case, etc.
Is that one patient or three?
 
Some are notorious for cancelling cases
That's a problem with your group that should be addressed internally. It's not a problem to be solved by surgeons shopping around.

I suppose it gets trickier if you're employees of the hospital or an AMC, and how well the place functions is not your problem. And it's not your partner, but just some guy who happens to work at the same place you do.
 
Depends a bit

Some are notorious for cancelling cases for nonsense reasons. K 5.6 in a dialysis patient...wants cardiac clearance for a hip fx just because patient is old..high BMI in an ASC..and recently with the GLP1 because they are 6 days out and not 7

Especially if it's an addon, late afternoon case, etc.
Yeah this gets annoying...examples:
- Hip fx gets posted for 5pm. My partner decides at 4:30 that they need cards clearance. Could have easily done a chart review and requested cards clearance at 8am instead of waiting til the hour before. Looks bad on us
-Pt comes in for MAC foot case. K is 2.9. Same partner cancels case. Pt comes in a week later, K is still 2.9. I order IV potassium and move pt to later in the day so we can replete and recheck K.
 
Top