Aspen Dental for OS

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
This is not a knock on 6 year programs btw, I ranked both 4 and 6 year programs primarily based upon the quality of the OMFS training (and partly for my ego), and I was willing to set aside my desire to optimize for finances knowing that I was going to be trained/be mentored under certain faculty. I think this was the right approach, for me at least. At the end of the day, I think you can optimize for both paths and double down on the strengths of your training and STILL live a more fantastic and fulfilling life than 99% of all humans that ever existed.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
HockeyDocOMFS said:
Can we get back on topic instead of this boring 4 vs 6 year argument? I need to make myself feel better by reading about how well corporate OMFS does so I can feel better about my decision
Click to expand...
I was very disappointed to hear that Clear Choice is only open Monday-Thursday. I imagined picking up extra days for money early on. But I know Aspen is always desperately looking for surgeons. If you go to any of the resident conferences, Aspen usually sends a rep and they’ll be happy to talk numbers with you.
 
TherealnorthOMFS said:
This is not a knock on 6 year programs btw, I ranked both 4 and 6 year programs primarily based upon the quality of the OMFS training (and partly for my ego), and I was willing to set aside my desire to optimize for finances knowing that I was going to be trained/be mentored under certain faculty. I think this was the right approach, for me at least. At the end of the day, I think you can optimize for both paths and double down on the strengths of your training and STILL live a more fantastic and fulfilling life than 99% of all humans that ever existed.
Click to expand...
What I came to realize pretty quickly is, it doesn’t really matter. The argument is really only made on SDN. We both respect each other as colleagues in an incredibly small field, and so we stick together. You can find whatever you are looking for in 4 or a 6 year program. Most come out and practice the same scope, regardless of 4 vs 6. We’ve both been on a hard earned journey with alot of sacrifice on the way. We are lucky to do what we do at the end of it. It’s the best kept secret in healthcare. We want to preserve that.
 
Last edited:
Ivy.ch said:
I was very disappointed to hear that Clear Choice is only open Monday-Thursday. I imagined picking up extra days for money early on. But I know Aspen is always desperately looking for surgeons. If you go to any of the resident conferences, Aspen usually sends a rep and they’ll be happy to talk numbers with you.
Click to expand...

I’ve heard the biggest knock to places like Aspen though is needing to bring all your own drugs and supplies. Offices might not be equipped for full blown sedations (specifically if there is an emergency). Not sure if I’m accurate on this.
 
White_Sponge_Nevus said:
Who knows man, anything could change at any time. AAOMS and OMSPAC are doing their best to protect us, but gotta be prepared for anything
Click to expand...
But isn’t the ADA (and other healthcare organizations) always talking about “increasing access to care?” If OS lost the ability to do independent anesthesia, I would think it would be that much harder to provide services
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Ivy.ch said:
That’s code for more lower-trained midlevels doing doctor stuff so healthcare companies can pay lower salaries
Click to expand...
Look at dental therapists; they are practically dentists that are supposed to "serve underserved communities" (at least the one's in MN). However, a large sum of graduates work in suburban/urban areas that don't have issues with access to care. Just another way to pay lower salaries. Dental Therapy | School of Dentistry
 
carabelliscusp said:
I'm curious how much you make moonlighting + resident salary
Click to expand...
I think moonlighting is something important to talk about but is commonly kept on the low/not talked about it during interviews. For those that can moonlight, they know how much of a game changer it is especially during med school.

For my program, I would say residents typically make 60-100k a year. I've heard of people making more - it all depends on how much you want to work. Some weeks I'll work 50 hours a week moonlighting. Other weeks I'll work 1 day. If you can go to a program that allows moonlighting, do it.
 
Life of Pablo said:
I think moonlighting is something important to talk about but is commonly kept on the low/not talked about it during interviews. For those that can moonlight, they know how much of a game changer it is especially during med school.

For my program, I would say residents typically make 60-100k a year. I've heard of people making more - it all depends on how much you want to work. Some weeks I'll work 50 hours a week moonlighting. Other weeks I'll work 1 day. If you can go to a program that allows moonlighting, do it.
Click to expand...
This is not typical. This is actually quite rare. Applicants should definitely not expect those numbers in residency.

At our program, we do M3, and while you can swing working on the weekend, missing weekdays is an easy way to fail the medical school year. Programs which do M2 may have more wiggle room to work during the week, but even then, I’ve heard of residents getting busted at other programs.
 
Aspen guaranteeing 750k in certain markets, but I think the numbers from other corps are just as good if not better, but with better workflow.

Im in a 4yr, but I think the argument between 4vs6 is overplayed. Who cares, both end up in the same board certification and scope unless you’re deadset on microvascular or full body cosmetics.
 
DDSER1 said:
Aspen guaranteeing 750k in certain markets, but I think the numbers from other corps are just as good if not better, but with better workflow.

Im in a 4yr, but I think the argument between 4vs6 is overplayed. Who cares, both end up in the same board certification and scope unless you’re deadset on microvascular or full body cosmetics.
Click to expand...
I’m pretty sure a single degree guy I know is fellowship trained microvascular
 
I’m always perplexed when this topic is mentioned in SDN. I do believe DD was merely saying that a 6 year trained would perhaps have an easier path to do that particular fellowship…not that a 4 year trained cannot, does not, or is not qualified to do that fellowship. We all select to go to a 6 vs 4 year residency for our own reasons. I have purposely chosen to attend a 6 year residency for specific reasons (e.g., they focused on the exact training I wanted + a good atmosphere to be trained in…that simple). I always chuckle a bit when I see the back and forth that happens when this topic is discussed…it’s really not that complicated.
 
D1Bound said:
Why is itinerant practice not allowed? I just read the code of conduct, and at the end it says that it does not apply to charity work or academic settings. So if it’s charity work all of a sudden you don’t have to form a patient relationship and such? Could you further explain
Click to expand...
Sure,

AAOMS Code of Professional conduct. Section C.5.a-g (Itinerant Surgery: Defined as elective oral and maxillofacial surgery performed in non-accredited surgical facilities other than the facility or facilities owned and/or leased by the oral and maxillofacial surgical practice employing the oral and maxillofacial surgeon.)....etc.

1684379626050.png


I have some experience with this topic.

But in reality, the deal is do not push your post op duties to non-OMS and make sure you have a plan in place for appropriate follow up and that patients can reach you. Then any OMS would be fine.
 
nade0016 said:
Sure,

AAOMS Code of Professional conduct. Section C.5.a-g (Itinerant Surgery: Defined as elective oral and maxillofacial surgery performed in non-accredited surgical facilities other than the facility or facilities owned and/or leased by the oral and maxillofacial surgical practice employing the oral and maxillofacial surgeon.)....etc.

View attachment 371637

I have some experience with this topic.

But in reality, the deal is do not push your post op duties to non-OMS and make sure you have a plan in place for appropriate follow up and that patients can reach you. Then any OMS would be fine.
Click to expand...
What post op duties can OMS delegate? Could they indirectly supervise a nurse or other GP if they took photos of the post op area and then say be in a 60 mile radius?
 
D1Bound said:
What post op duties can OMS delegate? Could they indirectly supervise a nurse or other GP if they took photos of the post op area and then say be in a 60 mile radius?
Click to expand...
Depends on your agreement with the GP, NP, procedure you perform in office, etc. More than likely if an OMS is in this kind of practice they will have a system figured out to get patients the care they need in a reasonable time frame. Now for the sake of completeness. OMS takes out a set of thirds in an office 250 miles away. Patient returns with submand. swelling 3 days later, GP looks and thinks it is OK, sends patient home with ABX. Patient develops Ludwigs, dies. The state board and then AAOMS CPC will review the case. The board may or may not take action depending on each states abandonment statutes since you delegated post op care to a person of lesser training, which is seen as unethical in some states. AAOMS always sees this as unethical and could pursue several options, ranging from letter of counsel to expulsion. From personal experience most OMS who are brought to the CPC for practicing itinerant surgery do have the process in place to have another, local OMS handle post ops if needed. The complaints are usually from the local OMS sick of treating the itinerant OMS post op complications and reporting them to the AAOMS CPC. Just goes to show how a friendly phone call to a local OMS could save you time and effort if practicing in this situation.

lastly, It's not illegal, it is seen as unethical to have OMS delegate responsibilities to those of lesser training.

Hope this helps.
 
Allsmiles! said:
I’m always perplexed when this topic is mentioned in SDN. I do believe DD was merely saying that a 6 year trained would perhaps have an easier path to do that particular fellowship…not that a 4 year trained cannot, does not, or is not qualified to do that fellowship. We all select to go to a 6 vs 4 year residency for our own reasons. I have purposely chosen to attend a 6 year residency for specific reasons (e.g., they focused on the exact training I wanted + a good atmosphere to be trained in…that simple). I always chuckle a bit when I see the back and forth that happens when this topic is discussed…it’s really not that complicated.
Click to expand...
From a 6 year guy leading a 4 year program......amen!
 
nade0016 said:
Depends on your agreement with the GP, NP, procedure you perform in office, etc. More than likely if an OMS is in this kind of practice they will have a system figured out to get patients the care they need in a reasonable time frame. Now for the sake of completeness. OMS takes out a set of thirds in an office 250 miles away. Patient returns with submand. swelling 3 days later, GP looks and thinks it is OK, sends patient home with ABX. Patient develops Ludwigs, dies. The state board and then AAOMS CPC will review the case. The board may or may not take action depending on each states abandonment statutes since you delegated post op care to a person of lesser training, which is seen as unethical in some states. AAOMS always sees this as unethical and could pursue several options, ranging from letter of counsel to expulsion. From personal experience most OMS who are brought to the CPC for practicing itinerant surgery do have the process in place to have another, local OMS handle post ops if needed. The complaints are usually from the local OMS sick of treating the itinerant OMS post op complications and reporting them to the AAOMS CPC. Just goes to show how a friendly phone call to a local OMS could save you time and effort if practicing in this situation.

lastly, It's not illegal, it is seen as unethical to have OMS delegate responsibilities to those of lesser training.

Hope this helps.
Click to expand...
Thank you for giving your time to us on SDN and for an excellent answer!
 
I need to throw a bone to the under represented single degree OMS on this forum 🤣

Here is why I ranked a few single degree programs above 6 year programs.
The scope and volume of cases of the program matters much more than 4 vs 6 years. There are 4 year programs that produce far better trained OMS than many 6 year programs and vice versa. This is highly program specific. Classifying programs as 4 vs 6 year is misleading. Classifying them as strong, average or weak would be more beneficial. IMO there are only three reasons someone should pursue a 6 year program over a 4 year program of similar strength.

1. MD will allow more fellowship opportunities in craniofacial, head and neck and facial cosmetics. The right candidate can do any of those fellowships with a single degree, but it just makes more sense to have the MD if you want to practice these specialties in a competitive market.

2. You know you want a career in academics. If this is your desire then you have already accepted that you will be leaving millions on the table financially and delaying your career two additional years probably doesn't concern you. It's important to note that the scope and comfort you develop during residency will be the scope you carry into academics, so a weak 6 year program should never be ranked above a strong 4 year program simply for an extra degree. You will regret this. You are privileged based on your case log not your diplomas. As far as academic job opportunities go, there are several programs looking for faculty/PD/Chairs that can't find people that are interested. All this to say that you can easily pursue academics with a single degree, but you will have to deal with false notion that dual degree OMS are better trained because of their neurology, psych and OB rotations. For this reason it probably makes sense to do the 6 year just to ease your mind while in academics. Again, pursuing a 6 year program should not be at the expense of program quality. Anyone that is honest with themselves will admit that a single degree OMS from Shreveport, for example, is far better trained than 95% of dual degree OMS.

3. Ego. This is probably why most people pursue it. They justify it by saying other things like they value education, but when it comes down to it they simply just want to say they have a MD. No shame in it. Unfortunately, despite the extra two years and additional rotations the medical community will always view you as a dentist first and foremost. They will underestimate your ability to provide anesthesia and ability to perform surgery regardless. This is complete nonsense, but this is the culture within medicine. General surgeons are superior to ENT/PRS, Medicine docs are superior to EM docs, Cardiologist are superior to medicine docs, etc. The point is that the stigma doesn't go away once you get a MD, accept the stigma and save yourself two years. You went to dental school for a reason, be proud of it.


Now, there are several reasons to pursue a 4 year program instead of a 6 year program.

1. Financial. It is such a costly decision and the cost is so under estimated. Here are a few points that come to mind. I'm sure there are more.
- Cost of medical school tuition, (null if medical school is free)
- Student loan interest accumulation during the additional two years
- Two additional years of inflation and OMS income that is not progressing with the rate of inflation
- Two years of missing out on compound interest/investments
- Loss of two of your most productive years in private practice. This is easily 2-3 million dollars directly, + compound interest 😱. I won't explain why these two years are your top grossing years and not your first two after residency. There are other posts that explain this well if interested.
- Opportunity cost.

2. Opportunity Cost. This overlaps with financial, but is a separate issue in itself.
- There is no guarantee that OMS will continue to make extraordinary income in the coming years. The specialty of OMS is experiencing a lot of change right now. Why risk guaranteed high return years to pursue a medical degree?
- DSO's are on the rise, referral bases are being bought up at an alarming rate. These DSO's push to keep OS in house.
- Private Equity is buying up large numbers of OMS practices. Two years could mean the difference of you buying your dream practice vs Dental Care Alliance buying it. When OMS goes corporate it will be no different than any other medical specialty. The advantage of dentistry over most of medicine is that there is opportunity to own your own practice and reap the tax/financial benefit of that.
- A different OMS could join your dream practice, taking your desired job.
- Insurance companies are constantly finding ways to reduce their payout. We already lost orthognathic surgery- reimbursed less than a third molar case? Third molars are under attack as well. Insurance companies are claiming that multiple teeth taken out during one surgery fall under "multiple procedure payment reduction." The first extracted tooth is reimbursed at 100% and the remaining teeth are reimbursed at 50%. AAOMS is fighting this, but the reality is that reimbursements will diminish one way or another. (EDIT: apparently MPPR has been overturned, this is great news). Regardless, it's best to make your money while you can.
- Single provider anesthesia/surgeon model is under attack
- This list could go on: tooth bud ablation technology, increase in "super" dentists, etc.

3. Very low return for two years of time. Are additional rotations on neurology, OB, Psych valuable? Sure. But, do they justify delaying your life two years and risking the above things? In my opinion, no. Will they make you a better OMS? In my opinion, no. If these rotations were truly beneficial then residents wouldn't moonlight during them. They would be focused on learning the field. Single degree OMS complete gen surg, trauma surg, ED, medicine, ICU rotations, ENT, PRS, etc. You learn the hospital system just as well. You place chest tubes, you push adenosine in ICU, you do medical workups all the same. If you polled ENT, PRS, NSGY, ortho (any surgical subspecialty) and asked if they would be willing to spend more time in residency to do additional rotations in OB, psych and neurology they would laugh in your face.
The reality is that in most 6 year programs you are sacrificing OMS months for low yield rotations.

4. Depending on the state you want to practice in you may or may not be able to advertise your medical degree. There are posts that explain this if interested. But for this reason the number of 6 year programs that you can pursue and actually receive the benefit of advertising a MD is reduced.

In short, the program case diversity and volume of surgeries matters much more than 4 vs 6. If you can find a single degree program that provides the things you are interested in then the shorter route is easily the most logical. This is why more applicants apply to four year programs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 702
RIPHarambe4 said:
I need to throw a bone to the under represented single degree OMS on this forum 🤣

Here is why I ranked a few single degree programs above 6 year programs.
The scope and volume of cases of the program matters much more than 4 vs 6 years. There are 4 year programs that produce far better trained OMS than many 6 year programs and vice versa. This is highly program specific. Classifying programs as 4 vs 6 year is misleading. Classifying them as strong, average or weak would be more beneficial. IMO there are only three reasons someone should pursue a 6 year program over a 4 year.

1. MD will allow more fellowship opportunities in craniofacial, head and neck and facial cosmetics. The right candidate can do any of those fellowships with a single degree, but it just makes more sense to have the MD if you want to practice these specialties in a competitive market.

2. You know you want a career in academics. If this is your desire then you have already accepted that you will be leaving millions on the table financially and delaying your career two additional years probably doesn't concern you. It's important to note that the scope and comfort you develop during residency will be the scope you carry into academics, so a weak 6 year program should never be ranked above a strong 4 year program simply for an extra degree. You will regret this. You are privileged based on your case log not your diplomas. As far as academic job opportunities go, there are several programs looking for faculty/PD/Chairs that can't find people that are interested. All this to say that you can easily pursue academics with a single degree, but you will have to deal with false notion that dual degree OMS are better trained because of their neurology, psych and OB rotations. For this reason it probably makes sense to do the 6 year just to ease your mind while in academics. Again, pursuing a 6 year program should not be at the expense of program quality. Anyone that is honest with themselves will admit that a single degree OMS from Shreveport, for example, is far better trained than 95% of dual degree OMS.

3. Ego. Unfortunately, despite the extra two years and additional rotations the medical community will always view you as a dentist first and foremost. They will underestimate your ability to provide anesthesia and ability to perform surgery regardless. This is complete nonsense, but this is the culture within medicine. General surgeons are superior to ENT/PRS, Medicine docs are superior to EM docs, Cardiologist are superior to medicine docs, etc.


Now, there are several reasons to pursue a 4 year program instead of a 6 year program.

1. Financial. It is such a costly decision and the cost is so under estimated. Here are a few points that come to mind. I'm sure there are more.
- Cost of medical school tuition, (null if medical school is free)
- Loss of two of your most productive years in private practice. This is easily 2-3 million dollars directly, + compound interest 😱. I don't have time to explain why these two years are your top grossing and not your first two after residency. There are other posts that explain this well if interested.
- Opportunity cost.

2. Opportunity Cost. This overlaps with financial, but is a separate issue in itself.
- There is no guarantee that OMS will continue to make extraordinary income in the coming years. The specialty of OMS is experiencing a lot of change right now. Why risk guaranteed high return years to pursue a medical degree?
- DSO's are on the rise, referral bases are being bought up at an alarming rate. These DSO's push to keep OS in house.
- Private Equity is buying up large numbers of OMS practices. Two years could mean the difference of you buying your dream practice vs Dental Care Alliance buying it. When OMS goes corporate it will be no different than any other medical specialty. The advantage of dentistry over most of medicine is that there is opportunity to own your own practice and reap the tax/financial benefit of that.
- A different OMS could join your dream practice, taking your desired job.
- Insurance companies are constantly finding ways to reduce their payout. We already lost orthognathic surgery- reimbursed less than a third molar case? Third molars are under attack as well. Insurance companies are claiming that multiple teeth taken out during one surgery fall under "multiple procedure payment reduction." The first extracted tooth is reimbursed at 100% and the remaining teeth are reimbursed at 50%. AAOMS is fighting this, but reality is that reimbursements will diminish. Make your money while you can.
- Single provider anesthesia/surgeon model is under attack
- This list could go on: tooth bud ablation technology, increase in "super" dentists, etc.

3. Very low return for two years of time. Are additional rotations on neurology, OB, Psych valuable? Sure. But, do they justify delaying your life two years and risking the above things? In my opinion, no. Will they make you a better OMS? In my opinion, no. If these rotations were truly beneficial then residents wouldn't moonlight during them. They would be focused on learning the field. Single degree OMS complete gen surg, trauma surg, ED, medicine, ICU rotations, ENT, PRS, etc. You learn the hospital system just as well. You place chest tubes, you push adenosine in ICU, you do medical workups all the same. The reality is that in most 6 year programs you are sacrificing OMS months for low yield rotations.

4. Depending on the state you want to practice in you may or may not be able to advertise your medical degree. There are posts that explain this if interested. But for this reason the number of 6 year programs that you can pursue and actually receive the benefit of advertising a MD is reduced.

In short, the program case diversity and volume of surgeries matters much more than 4 vs 6. If you can find a single degree program that provides the things you are interested in then the shorter route is easily the most logical. This is why more applicants apply to four year programs.
Click to expand...
What are the chances that OMS gets extremely reduced reimbursements for wisdom teeth? And loses single surgeon anesthesia model? Are these minor or are they very serious possibilities?
 
D1Bound said:
What are the chances that OMS gets extremely reduced reimbursements for wisdom teeth? And loses single surgeon anesthesia model? Are these minor or are they very serious possibilities?
Click to expand...
Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction is already happening with some insurance companies and Medicaid reimbursements hardly make it worth the risk of doing the surgery. So this is a real possibility that is already happening.

Losing single provider anesthesia/surgeon is a real possibility, but less likely than above. This depends on the state though. Look at states like California and North Carolina. As someone already mentioned this would reduce access to care which, IMO, is the only thing protecting us. This model does have a track record of being extremely safe which is nice, but unfortunately when accidents happen emotions rather than facts can create legislation.
 
RIPHarambe4 said:
Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction is already happening with some insurance companies and Medicaid reimbursements hardly make it worth the risk of doing the surgery. So this is a real possibility that is already happening.

Losing single provider anesthesia/surgeon is a real possibility, but less likely than above. This depends on the state though. Look at states like California and North Carolina. As someone already mentioned this would reduce access to care which, IMO, is the only thing protecting us. This model does have a track record of being extremely safe which is nice, but unfortunately when accidents happen emotions rather than facts can create legislation.
Click to expand...
What’s going to happen when no dentist does any procedure for Medicaid? Will the government finally raise reimbursement? Dental students right now see this and probably won’t ever consider doing it with their debt burden.
 
D1Bound said:
What’s going to happen when no dentist does any procedure for Medicaid? Will the government finally raise reimbursement? Dental students right now see this and probably won’t ever consider doing it with their debt burden.
Click to expand...
Unlikely that fees will be increased when the size of the pie grows year after year. Gov can increase FQHC's and lobby to have student loan reimbursement non-taxed income, this is the only way I see more providers servicing this population without disadvantaging themselves as well due to debt burden. The other issue is, not all states Medicaid services are the same, so procedure mix can be very limited or robust, which also influences whether or not a dentist wants to work somewhere their scope is limited vs maximized.
 
D1Bound said:
What are the chances that OMS gets extremely reduced reimbursements for wisdom teeth? And loses single surgeon anesthesia model? Are these minor or are they very serious possibilities?
Click to expand...
Multiple procedure payment reduction for extractions (among other dental procedures) has been reverted/nixed. ADA/AAOMS was successful in getting this reversed for numerous CDT codes, specifically with regard to CMS/Medicare. Any medical insurance companies who had adopted the MPPRs for CDT codes are likely to follow suit and also reverse their policies.

Please see below:
 
caffeine jitters said:
the goated approach is to go military, have dental school paid for, get paid 120k a year as a resident, and moonlight during payback years
Click to expand...
If finances is what you’re mainly concerned with, your suggested route does not beat going the traditional path (single degree - non military), and working full time in the private sector. The civilian/private omfs would have easily caught up before the military omfs was out of his 4 year service obligation.

Even if the military were to pay for the most expensive dental school, the private sector still wins.

This is of course only considering the financial aspect.
 
caffeine jitters said:
the goated approach is to go military, have dental school paid for, get paid 120k a year as a resident, and moonlight during payback years
Click to expand...
I’m not in any sort of residency training yet, but to me the health insurance and the security of having BAH would make residency in the military less stressful.
 
D1Bound said:
I’m not in any sort of residency training yet, but to me the health insurance and the security of having BAH would make residency in the military less stressful.
Click to expand...

The lack of call and trauma does as well in the military. They typically have to send their residents off to other programs for this experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 702
D1Bound said:
I’m not in any sort of residency training yet, but to me the health insurance and the security of having BAH would make residency in the military less stressful.
Click to expand...
Making more money oftentimes means you are taking risk.

Some people will choose the less stressful route, and make less money. It is not wrong, but it is an option.
 
I applied to both 4 and 6 year programs, mostly based on location (knew I didn't want to be rural). I ranked both 4 and 6 year programs in my top 5. There are good and bad 4 year programs, and there are good and bad 6 year programs. I ended up doing a 6-year OMS program, over a 4-year program, because that's the one I got in to. I didn't see a huge reason to do the MD; but acknowledge that stuff may change in the future. My family was happy to support me through it, so that helped my decision. While in the 2 years of medical school and 1 year of general surgery (generally forgotten by most of us in the field that an MD integrated track includes this) I had a great time, met a lot of cool people, dated (I suppose if I had a family at that time, I would have been able to spend it with them). This time ends up being a little break from hustling in dental school and then the grind of residency, so enjoy it.
Im 4 years out now. Do I think the MD has helped me? Not professionally yet... But I also don't really try to make it help me. I don't play the MD card, maybe I should. I work in a hospital 2 days a week, and aspen another 2 days. My MD is on my name tag, but rarely does anyone ask me about it, which is funny I think. Every once in a while a mom will ask if the sedation is safe. I'll use my MD card then. In the hospital, where I am surrounded by dentists in the clinic; I feel like they sometimes look to me for medical management decisions. But we also have 3-4 other oral surgeons who are all single-degree and if I'm not around, they are equally happy to ask them. I think the MD helped me find my now wife (she's an MD), and my relatives who don't really understand what I do, understand I have a medical degree, and are less likely to ask "so how's dentistry" because of the official MD designation. Was it worth the 2 years? Monetarily hell no. But frankly, we make so much money, it's a drop in the bucket. Timewise, like I said, I had fun. You are only a student once.
 
omfsing said:
Nope, your 40% should be 8-10k per day

Producing 8-10K/day as an oral surgeon is very low.
Click to expand...
As my wife would say: *should* is a dangerous word. If you making (income) 8-10k a day, you are making 2 million a year (income). Very very very few oral surgeons make this much (however, I know a few who are). This is far from the norm.

I wouldn't say 8-10k production is very low. Id say it is less than the average for most practice models. I'd argue that some traditional OS practice models aimed for 8-10k a day. It could mean 5 wisdom tooth cases at 2k a pop.

I work for aspen. Average aspen production for an oral surgeon is 15k per day.
I don't think the DSO model is for everyone. But if you can make it work for you, and you can put up with the increased risk, the disorganization (read: circus), and work with it - it can be quite profitable; and the best thing about it: you don't have to put down a bunch of money for a business loan, or rent a property or buy instruments or whatever. "plug and play" if you will.
 
Contach said:
As my wife would say: *should* is a dangerous word. If you making (income) 8-10k a day, you are making 2 million a year (income). Very very very few oral surgeons make this much (however, I know a few who are). This is far from the norm.

I wouldn't say 8-10k production is very low. Id say it is less than the average for most practice models. I'd argue that some traditional OS practice models aimed for 8-10k a day. It could mean 5 wisdom tooth cases at 2k a pop.

I work for aspen. Average aspen production for an oral surgeon is 15k per day.
I don't think the DSO model is for everyone. But if you can make it work for you, and you can put up with the increased risk, the disorganization (read: circus), and work with it - it can be quite profitable; and the best thing about it: you don't have to put down a bunch of money for a business loan, or rent a property or buy instruments or whatever. "plug and play" if you will.
Click to expand...
Take home is 30% collections?
 
702 said:
Take home is 30% collections?
Click to expand...
40% minus some expenses (like bad debt, and assistant wages), which ends up bringing my take home down to like 33-35%
 
  • Like
Reactions: 702
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
OS Letters of Recommendation
Replies
1
Views
781
IndifferentOsteoblast
IndifferentOsteoblast
Hemingway3132
What Makes a Great OS Extern?
Replies
5
Views
1K
nade0016
nade0016
85-29
Best GPR/AEGD Programs for OS Experience?
Replies
10
Views
4K
ThirdMolarz
ThirdMolarz
A
Dental Robotics Study
Replies
1
Views
456
dante72
D
L
Dental Specialties Application - MATCH
Replies
0
Views
569
latinadentist
L
Top