- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
- Messages
- 695
- Reaction score
- 644
In light of the coming ASTRO advocacy day, it was posited on the ROHUB that one of ASTRO’s issues should be to endorse single payer/universal care. Pros/cons of this?
Only in medicine do we have members of an industry advocating for reduction in funding for said industry. By setting up a legal monopsony, that's precisely what single-payer health care is designed to do.
She doesn’t really believe in anythingLiz doesn't really believe in MFA. Truth is the STEMI Sanders is the only real believer and he will never have the leverage to pass that type of bill.
Why would anyone support a 40% wage reduction for doctors and a middle class tax increase? Only our wise members of the ASTRO Board would consider this a subject to discuss: Remember if you can negotiate Monopoly Rates-Choose Wisely. A bad idea
Amazon product
ASTRO should follow in the footsteps of the ACP and offer to full throated support of single payer healthcare.
It would be most consistent with their ideals of ruining the prospects for he younger generation by turning them into little lemmings who can quote EBM at the drop of a hat and take orders without question.
Bingo. Check ROHUB today. You were a day early.
you should elaborate?
Astro obviously cannot and will not publicly advocate for something that is in clear direct opposition to the interests of the majority of the membership. I expect no formal position to be taken in either direction ahead of advocacy day this year.
Killing site neutrality as a possibility when the majority of it's membership were private practioners
I could. Or, I could not spoon feed you and you could go there and read for yourself.
Bingo. Check ROHUB today. You were a day early.
Killing site neutrality as a possibility when the majority of it's membership were private practioners
To summarize the conversation on this topic on RO Hub (how should ASTRO advocate for you?) - the current topic has shifted to supervision requirements. As you know CMS eliminated the need for direct RO supervision in 2020 for hospital outpatient centers.
ASTRO's position (which was posted in RO Hub) is that it is important for direct supervision by an RO MD to always happen. Exceptions can exist in their mind but should be reserved for rural/undeserved settings.
However, the consistent feedback from ASTRO members on RO Hub is that direct supervision is an unnecessary burden on RO MDs. It should only be mandated for special procedures like HDR, SRS, and SBRT.
I am trying to get my administration on board with this.some of you may still have 'High High Hopes' but it's done, son!