- Joined
- Apr 12, 2015
- Messages
- 424
- Reaction score
- 316
You've obviously never met me B-)Because we know this is impossible!
I kid, of course 😛
Sent from my C5306 using Tapatalk
You've obviously never met me B-)Because we know this is impossible!
Because we know this is impossible!
When the letter writer shows an understanding of what we want to know instead of the generic bland blather, we know we are (at least potentially) getting an honest and forthcoming assessment.
An honest and thoughtful evaluation of strengths (and weaknesses) is a much more powerful letter than the usual fluff.I realize this helps maintain trust in whatever institution the applicant is from but weaknesses will do nothing but hurt an applicant. As we saw from that person who posted a thread about not matching today...
An honest and thoughtful evaluation of strengths (and weaknesses) is a much more powerful letter than the usual fluff.
Of course! In the context of a real LOE, we expect to see areas of weakness.So even if there's a negative comment or two you guys are willing to overlook that if there's enough positives to offset it and perhaps if you believe that the person has potential to improve?
Your school has accepted people who had these "weaknesses" in their letters?
I don't think this was an auto-reject, but I heard from another interviewee about this story somewhere and it definitely upset me. Apparently there was an interviewee that showed up all shabby and had cat-hairs everywhere (which okay, was inappropriate), and some other fellow interviewees would make snide comments to her the whole day and make fun of her attire. I think what pissed me off about this story is that no one bothered to stick up for her. For some reason this story just stuck with me.
There are many Latin Americans with Spanish (as in Spain) descent that are white in skin color.