awards over malpractice limits?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

caligas

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
2,207
Reaction score
2,788
Just asking out of pure curiosity: Has anybody experienced or known of a physician having to pay out of pocket for a malpractice award above their policy limits? I understand this would be rare and that the system is set up in a way that avoids this.
 
Just asking out of pure curiosity: Has anybody experienced or known of a physician having to pay out of pocket for a malpractice award above their policy limits? I understand this would be rare and that the system is set up in a way that avoids this.

Malpractice Lawsuit:

6 year old male presents for closed reduction of forearm fracture. Mother states no known medical problems but he falls a lot lately and seems to have some trouble running with the other kids. He ate a Happy Meal about 3 hours ago.

Ortho Surgeon has an appointment with his divorce lawyer and wants to do the case ASAP. He talks the Anesthesiologist into doing the case. The Anesthesiologist finished his Residency 6 months ago. The plan is a RSI with Propofol/SUx.

Shortly after induction of anesthesia the kid arrests. CPR. MH suspected by the Anesthesiologist so MH treatment started. Kid dies. Mom sues.

Malpractice Carrier offers Plaintiff's Attorney the full amount of the policy: $750K. The plaintiffs agree to the $750K plus another $250K from the CRNA.

The Anesthesiologist is convinced he did nothing wrong. He wants to fight the case out in court despite the fact he probably will lose the case (several errors were likely made here).
Malpractice Carrier says any award over $750K and they won't pay the money. They inform the Anesthesiologist to settle the case or be prepared to pay the verdict for anything in excess of $750K.

Hence, your malpractice insurance carries caveats with it. Does the Insurance carrier have the right to settle a claim without your approval? And, will you be on the hook for a verdict in excess of your policy limits if you don't follow the advice of the carrier?
 
Well either way if the award is above limits than you are on the hook.

The reason I got to thinking about this was that I have been researching asset protection trusts and offshore accounts etc and wonder if they are helpful or even necessary from the standpoint of malpractice concerns.
 
Well either way if the award is above limits than you are on the hook.

The reason I got to thinking about this was that I have been researching asset protection trusts and offshore accounts etc and wonder if they are helpful or even necessary from the standpoint of malpractice concerns.

If you offer up the limits of your policy and those limits are considered "reasonable" then you are OFF THE HOOK. This means that 99% of the time (or more) offering the limits of your policy upfront (prior to trial) settles the case.

The key word is reasonable so a $250K limit may not be enough in an area where the average income is $100K per year. But, a $750K or $1 Million policy is considered "reasonable" in almost every area of the country.

If your carrier decides to go to trial then you are covered for tens of millions of dollars as the carrier will bear the risk of trial.
 
Well either way if the award is above limits than you are on the hook.

The reason I got to thinking about this was that I have been researching asset protection trusts and offshore accounts etc and wonder if they are helpful or even necessary from the standpoint of malpractice concerns.

Malpractice isn't your biggest concern if you have a $1 million policy. Auto coverage and Personal Umbrella policies.

If your wife or you hits another car and they find out you have cash then be prepared for a lawsuit. If the person has any injuries due to your negligence they will sue for a million easily. This is why you need solid auto coverage or an umbrella policy.

Your risk of being taken to the wood shed is higher with a personal lawsuit than a malpractice case.
 
personal-injury-lawyer-vancouver.jpg
 
People are often shocked to learn that unlike most states, Florida allows doctors to practice without medical malpractice insurance. Often, this means that a patient killed or injured by a careless, uninsured physician could potentially be left with little or no compensation for their damages, medical bills and lost wages. Florida requires doctors to have insurance to own and drive a car, but not to perform open heart surgery. After more than 20 years of investigating claims of botched plastic surgeries, misdiagnosed diseases and wrong site procedures, I simply cannot understand this.

Florida doctors routinely escape responsibility for having malpractice insurance simply by posting a little sign in their reception area and setting up an irrevocable line of credit. The sign is supposed to inform patients that the doctor or doctors have no malpractice insurance. Perhaps you have seen one at your own doctor's office? According to Florida's Medical Practice Statute §458.320(7), the sign is required to state the following:

Under Florida law, doctors are generally required to carry medical malpractice insurance or otherwise demonstrate financial responsibility to cover potential claims for medical malpractice. However, certain part-time physicians who meet state requirements are exempt from the financial responsibility law. YOUR DOCTOR MEETS THESE REQUIREMENTS AND HAS DECIDED NOT TO CARRY MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE. This notice is provided pursuant to Florida law.


In addition to the sign, uninsured doctors have to obtain an irrevocable line of credit to pay a malpractice claim. The line must be made payable to the doctor upon presentation of a final judgment or settlement. The funds cannot be used for litigation costs or defense attorney's fee. The amount is dependent upon whether or not the doctor performs surgery or enjoys staff privileges at a hospital. Doctors who do not operate or have staff privileges are only required to maintain a line of credit equal to $100,000 per claim or $300,000 per incident. Doctors who operate or have hospital privileges must have a line of $250,000 or $750,000 per incident.

I have sued doctors for more than 20 years. My very first case involved an improperly-performed circumcision on a little boy performed by a first-year resident at a Miami medical school. Thankfully, the doctor was insured and the case resolved. Today, more and more doctors are electing to "go bare." Virtually every lawyer who sues doctors in Florida takes the case on a contingency fee basis, in my experience. That means they will only get paid if and when the case resolves. It also means that the lawyer is responsible for fronting the costs of the investigation and trial. Because uninsured doctors are undesirable defendants for most personal injury lawyers, when any Florida medical malpractice lawyer investigates a potential claim, one of the first questions asked is, "Does the doctor have malpractice insurance?"

A typical medical malpractice claim can cost a Florida lawyer thousands of dollars in time and money to simply conduct their investigation. Not to mention tens of thousands of dollars more to take a case all the way to trial. Lawyers of injured patients cannot simply sue a doctor for malpractice in Florida. First, all medical records, diagnostic films and expert opinions have to be obtained before a lawsuit can be filed. Additionally, patients have to comply with Florida's pre-suit medical malpractice labyrinth -- all within two years of the incident. In the end, no matter what a jury might value the damages to be, it still would be subject to Florida's malpractice caps.

Compare a car accident caused by the very same doctor in the parking lot of the hospital. Imagine he accidentally hits a pedestrian and breaks his leg. To sue this doctor for the injuries, no expert witness or pre-suit protocol is required. Assuming the doctor is in compliance with Florida law, he would have at least PIP insurance to drive his car. A lawsuit could be filed up to four years, twice as long as a medical malpractices claim. And any jury verdict would not be capped.

Convincing a jury that a doctor has committed malpractice is not easy, but collecting from an uninsured doctor is almost impossible, in my experience. Many doctors are often well-schooled in asset protection and have found creative and legal ways to insulate them from collection.

Supposedly, uninsured doctors are required to pay a settlement or judgment, or be subject to disciplinary action or suspension by Florida's Department of Health. But verdicts are often appealed and frequently reversed. And even when a judgment sticks, it can be tied up in a bankruptcy proceeding that could potentially delay payouts for years.

When the father of young children dies suddenly due to medical neglect, it can leave a family emotionally and financially destroyed. Commonly, a desperate family is forced to accept a small settlement. Florida's insurance industry has done a great job in falsely convincing the public that medical malpractice insurance costs have driven doctors out of the state. In the end, it is injured patients and their families
 
Last edited:
If you offer up the limits of your policy and those limits are considered "reasonable" then you are OFF THE HOOK. This means that 99% of the time (or more) offering the limits of your policy upfront (prior to trial) settles the case.

The key word is reasonable so a $250K limit may not be enough in an area where the average income is $100K per year. But, a $750K or $1 Million policy is considered "reasonable" in almost every area of the country.

If your carrier decides to go to trial then you are covered for tens of millions of dollars as the carrier will bear the risk of trial.

Very interesting. Did not know that.

I think ill increase my umbrella and auto liability, especially my wife's.
 
People are often shocked to learn that unlike most states, Florida allows doctors to practice without medical malpractice insurance. Often, this means that a patient killed or injured by a careless, uninsured physician could potentially be left with little or no compensation for their damages, medical bills and lost wages. Florida requires doctors to have insurance to own and drive a car, but not to perform open heart surgery. After more than 20 years of investigating claims of botched plastic surgeries, misdiagnosed diseases and wrong site procedures, I simply cannot understand this.

Florida doctors routinely escape responsibility for having malpractice insurance simply by posting a little sign in their reception area and setting up an irrevocable line of credit. The sign is supposed to inform patients that the doctor or doctors have no malpractice insurance. Perhaps you have seen one at your own doctor's office? According to Florida's Medical Practice Statute §458.320(7), the sign is required to state the following:

Under Florida law, doctors are generally required to carry medical malpractice insurance or otherwise demonstrate financial responsibility to cover potential claims for medical malpractice. However, certain part-time physicians who meet state requirements are exempt from the financial responsibility law. YOUR DOCTOR MEETS THESE REQUIREMENTS AND HAS DECIDED NOT TO CARRY MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE. This notice is provided pursuant to Florida law.


In addition to the sign, uninsured doctors have to obtain an irrevocable line of credit to pay a malpractice claim. The line must be made payable to the doctor upon presentation of a final judgment or settlement. The funds cannot be used for litigation costs or defense attorney's fee. The amount is dependent upon whether or not the doctor performs surgery or enjoys staff privileges at a hospital. Doctors who do not operate or have staff privileges are only required to maintain a line of credit equal to $100,000 per claim or $300,000 per incident. Doctors who operate or have hospital privileges must have a line of $250,000 or $750,000 per incident.

I have sued doctors for more than 20 years. My very first case involved an improperly-performed circumcision on a little boy performed by a first-year resident at a Miami medical school. Thankfully, the doctor was insured and the case resolved. Today, more and more doctors are electing to "go bare." Virtually every lawyer who sues doctors in Florida takes the case on a contingency fee basis, in my experience. That means they will only get paid if and when the case resolves. It also means that the lawyer is responsible for fronting the costs of the investigation and trial. Because uninsured doctors are undesirable defendants for most personal injury lawyers, when any Florida medical malpractice lawyer investigates a potential claim, one of the first questions asked is, "Does the doctor have malpractice insurance?"

A typical medical malpractice claim can cost a Florida lawyer thousands of dollars in time and money to simply conduct their investigation. Not to mention tens of thousands of dollars more to take a case all the way to trial. Lawyers of injured patients cannot simply sue a doctor for malpractice in Florida. First, all medical records, diagnostic films and expert opinions have to be obtained before a lawsuit can be filed. Additionally, patients have to comply with Florida's pre-suit medical malpractice labyrinth -- all within two years of the incident. In the end, no matter what a jury might value the damages to be, it still would be subject to Florida's malpractice caps.

Compare a car accident caused by the very same doctor in the parking lot of the hospital. Imagine he accidentally hits a pedestrian and breaks his leg. To sue this doctor for the injuries, no expert witness or pre-suit protocol is required. Assuming the doctor is in compliance with Florida law, he would have at least PIP insurance to drive his car. A lawsuit could be filed up to four years, twice as long as a medical malpractices claim. And any jury verdict would not be capped.

Convincing a jury that a doctor has committed malpractice is not easy, but collecting from an uninsured doctor is almost impossible, in my experience. Many doctors are often well-schooled in asset protection and have found creative and legal ways to insulate them from collection.

Supposedly, uninsured doctors are required to pay a settlement or judgment, or be subject to disciplinary action or suspension by Florida's Department of Health. But verdicts are often appealed and frequently reversed. And even when a judgment sticks, it can be tied up in a bankruptcy proceeding that could potentially delay payouts for years.

When the father of young children dies suddenly due to medical neglect, it can leave a family emotionally and financially destroyed. Commonly, a desperate family is forced to accept a small settlement. Florida's insurance industry has done a great job in falsely convincing the public that medical malpractice insurance costs have driven doctors out of the state. In the end, it is injured patients and their families

Blade,

While I have little doubt that your post is accurate, for the residents and young attendings please note: your post is accurate only for FLORIDA. THIS STUFF VARIES HUGELY BASED ON STATE LAW. State law is also a moving target.

Agree with having lots of personal liability and umbrella liability insurance. Also for the non finance types, THESE POLICIES DO NOT cover malpractice awards in excess of your professional liability policy.

Also agree that offering to settle within your policy limits will usually make the lawsuit go away, or atleast insulate yourself from an award in excess of your personal liability policy. but there is often a consequence for doing so. (NPDB, future increase in premiums, etc.)
 
Blade,

While I have little doubt that your post is accurate, for the residents and young attendings please note: your post is accurate only for FLORIDA. THIS STUFF VARIES HUGELY BASED ON STATE LAW. State law is also a moving target.

Agree with having lots of personal liability and umbrella liability insurance. Also for the non finance types, THESE POLICIES DO NOT cover malpractice awards in excess of your professional liability policy.

Also agree that offering to settle within your policy limits will usually make the lawsuit go away, or atleast insulate yourself from an award in excess of your personal liability policy. but there is often a consequence for doing so. (NPDB, future increase in premiums, etc.)

A key point on going bare in fl; you must be willing to declare bankruptcy. Although its unlikely you would ever need to. It actually sounds pretty good, but I like hills too much to move there.

"My parents didnt want to move to florida, but they turned 65 and the law's the law." Jerry Seinfeld.
 
Blade,

While I have little doubt that your post is accurate, for the residents and young attendings please note: your post is accurate only for FLORIDA. THIS STUFF VARIES HUGELY BASED ON STATE LAW. State law is also a moving target.

Agree with having lots of personal liability and umbrella liability insurance. Also for the non finance types, THESE POLICIES DO NOT cover malpractice awards in excess of your professional liability policy.

Also agree that offering to settle within your policy limits will usually make the lawsuit go away, or atleast insulate yourself from an award in excess of your personal liability policy. but there is often a consequence for doing so. (NPDB, future increase in premiums, etc.)

Yes, you are correct. I carry malpractice insurance. If you are faced with a possible multi million dollar verdict the carrier will settle almost every time regardless of your concerns about the NPDB, etc.
 
The goal of the plaintiff is to get as close to the maximum amount of your policy as possible without going to trial. There is no point in seeking any more money than that as the carrier is obligated to pay your policy. In addition, you get released from any additional monetary damages by settling the case.

Malpractice isn't about justice or fairness but rather money. The system is designed for lawyers to profit lawyers.
 
Top