I'm interested in learning about Awareness With Recall from the perspective of those of you who spend time in the OR and may have witnessed this phenomenon. All replies strictly confidential, if you wish.
John Crewdson
Project on Government Oversight
Washington, DC
Good morning. I had to chuckle at some of your replies. Yes, there's only one John Crewdson, now working for the Project on Government Oversight. POGO is a non-profit, non-partisan government watchdog whose investigations into waste, fraud and other corruption have saved taxpayers many millions of dollars over the last three decades. I'm guessing most of you don't have a problem with that. Check out our Web site for details. Meanwhile, I've come across some journal articles, including one from the BMJ published in 2010, which conclude that AWR occurs in some form about 100 times a day. Is that a small number or a large one? Either way, I would like to talk with any of you who have ever seen this happen, or know someone who's observed it.
All best,
John
Forgive our skepticism, but we have had a long history of individuals misrepresenting themselves and their motives on this forum when visiting in search of medical and legal advice. So, John Crewdson from POGO, since you have come here representing yourself in somewhat of an official capacity, what interest does POGO have in this issue? I fail to see the connection between POGO and intra-operative awareness.
I am not sure which article you are referring to that listed an incidence of 100 events per day (the only 2010 BMJ awareness article that I know of is a dramatic recollection of the patient's and physician's perspectives of an episode of intra-operative awareness) so it is hard to comment on what the prevalence might be (and prevalence is the real number you want). The number 100 per day in isolation is neither large nor small it just is. To answer the question is it large or small, you need a denominator to give you a prevalence. Obviously 100 episodes of awareness out of 200 cases would be a huge prevalence and a huge problem. 100 episodes out of 1 million (cue Dr. Evil stage left) cases would be less of a problem.
Is it 100 cases per day in The UK only, cases in the US, or cases world-wide? Further, is it is for all cases or only high risk cases?
For the sake of argument, we will assume the number 100 is true and it applies to all types of cases, performed in the US only. There are some 20-30 million anesthetics in the US per year which would give a prevalence of 0.122% - 0.18%. However, that number is both artificially high and low depending on the population you are looking at. The bulk of the risk will be taken by high-risk cases (cardio-pulmonary bypass, c-sections etc) so for them the risk would be higher than stated above. For non-high-risk patients the risk would be significantly lower.
However, if the number 100 is only for cases in the UK, then the risk is significantly higher. So you see, we need more detail to answer the question is 100 large or small.
Remember that was a mental exercise and the numbers stated are not indicative of reality until we have more information on your 100 cases.
Returning to reality, good studies peg the prevalence of intra-operative awareness at 0.1-0.2% in high-risk populations. For an example, see below. Keep in mind that the risk for non-high-risk populations is significantly lower.
http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/1099152/1264647715/name/awareness%2Bprevention%2B2011.pdf
- pod