Hey Guys,
I apologize in advance because I know these threads tend to get very redundant, but I wanted to hear others' input on this. I've narrowed down my acceptances to AZCOM and NSU and have been struggling in deciding which one to attend between the two.
NSU is relatively established, has a nice location, campus and facilities, strong clinical rotations, and is also is the cheaper of the two schools.
Cons: I've heard some pretty negative comments about the quality of the teaching especially during M1 year. I believe AZCOM's students tend to do better on the boards, and the mandatory rural rotation requirements at NSU could potentially interfere with audition rotation season. However, at this point, I am interested in either internal medicine, emergency medicine, or anesthesiology, which aren't too competitive, and I think the importance of doing an audition rotation may be overestimated anyways.
AZCOM is closer to home (I'm from CA) but also very expensive. They also offer rotations in L.A. which might increase my chances of getting a CA residency. The main thing that draws me towards AZCOM is their board scores and quality of teaching. I really feel like this is something that can't be overlooked, but I of course do realize that how a person performs on boards is much more a reflection of their own hard work as opposed to the school they attended. But better teaching means students have a much better foundation to work with in studying. Is the teaching at NSU that bad? This also concerns me because class attendance is mandatory, and if the teaching is that horrible, sitting in class would be such a waste of time. How do students perform on boards? NSU students seem to post a lot more on sdn and I haven't been able to find out much about AZCOM in terms of their quality of clinical rotations. What I do know is that students at Midwestern have a lot more freedom with their electives 4th year and that majority of rotations are preceptor based (not sure if that's a good or bad thing).
Any input would be greatly appreciated, especially some AZCOM 3rd or 4th years that can comment on their rotation experience and the curriculum.
Thanks!
I apologize in advance because I know these threads tend to get very redundant, but I wanted to hear others' input on this. I've narrowed down my acceptances to AZCOM and NSU and have been struggling in deciding which one to attend between the two.
NSU is relatively established, has a nice location, campus and facilities, strong clinical rotations, and is also is the cheaper of the two schools.
Cons: I've heard some pretty negative comments about the quality of the teaching especially during M1 year. I believe AZCOM's students tend to do better on the boards, and the mandatory rural rotation requirements at NSU could potentially interfere with audition rotation season. However, at this point, I am interested in either internal medicine, emergency medicine, or anesthesiology, which aren't too competitive, and I think the importance of doing an audition rotation may be overestimated anyways.
AZCOM is closer to home (I'm from CA) but also very expensive. They also offer rotations in L.A. which might increase my chances of getting a CA residency. The main thing that draws me towards AZCOM is their board scores and quality of teaching. I really feel like this is something that can't be overlooked, but I of course do realize that how a person performs on boards is much more a reflection of their own hard work as opposed to the school they attended. But better teaching means students have a much better foundation to work with in studying. Is the teaching at NSU that bad? This also concerns me because class attendance is mandatory, and if the teaching is that horrible, sitting in class would be such a waste of time. How do students perform on boards? NSU students seem to post a lot more on sdn and I haven't been able to find out much about AZCOM in terms of their quality of clinical rotations. What I do know is that students at Midwestern have a lot more freedom with their electives 4th year and that majority of rotations are preceptor based (not sure if that's a good or bad thing).
Any input would be greatly appreciated, especially some AZCOM 3rd or 4th years that can comment on their rotation experience and the curriculum.
Thanks!
