1. Hey Guest! Check out the 3 MCAT Study Plan Options listed in the 'stickies' area at the top of the forums (BoomBoom, SN2ed, and MCATJelly). Let us know which you like best.

    Also, we now offer a MCAT Test-Prep Exhibitions Forum where you can ask questions directly from the test-prep services.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Download free Tapatalk for iPhone or Tapatalk for Android for your phone and follow the SDN forums with push notifications.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice

Interview Feedback: Visit Interview Feedback to view and submit interview information.

Interviewing Masterclass: Free masterclass on interviewing from SDN and Medical College of Georgia

Dismiss Notice
Hey Texans—join us for a DFW meetup! Click here to learn more.

Berkeley Review - Correlation of scores to real thing?

Discussion in 'MCAT Discussions' started by MBHockey, Dec 28, 2008.

  1. MBHockey

    10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    Messages:
    413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Medical Student
    I'm using just the Berk Review books to do my own prep and I've only just started actually using them (April MCAT). I did the first section of the first physics book today and I'm curious about how these scores correlate to the "real thing".

    Is there any consensus on how the Berkeley review books compare to the real test? My scaled score for the first section of the first physics book was "greater than or equal to a 12", but I'm curious of how indicative this really is. Say I can get "> or = to 12" on all the sections in physics and gen. chem of the berk review books -- does this mean I'd have a good shot of getting a 12 in April for the PS section?

    By the way -- (FWIW) I think these books are absolutely great. I looked at Princeton Review and talked to a few friends who taught Kaplan courses for the MCAT and I am glad I went with these books. They really stress conceptual understanding and logic to help arrive at answers confidently and quickly.
     
  2. Note: SDN Members do not see this ad.

  3. TheBoondocks

    TheBoondocks StreetFighter 4 Virtuoso
    10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    1
    Status:
    Pre-Medical
    They are harder. Finally, don't worry about accuracy. You should focus on improving your logic and conceptual skills. If you do this, the accuracy takes care of itself. Finally, the advantage is that they combine 2 or 3 concepts in questions which is what the MCAT likes to do. The only true correlation are the AAMCs, take those after you're done with content review or close to being done.
     
  4. J ROD

    J ROD Watch my TAN walk!!
    Rocket Scientist Physician Pharmacist Lifetime Donor Classifieds Approved 10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    58,207
    Likes Received:
    1,944
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    they are generally harder but the real one always seemed to get me with some weird passage or two.

    No matter what the real one was just different to me.

    BR is great for gchem, phy, and ochem.

    I would use something else for verbal and bio.

    either EK for bio and EK verbal 101 for verbal.
     

Share This Page