- Joined
- Jan 22, 2006
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 0
So what does everybody think of the MGH, BWH, JHU, Yale, Duke, UVA, Emory programs so far?
So what does everybody think of the MGH, BWH, JHU, Yale, Duke, UVA, Emory programs so far?
I had no idea emory was considered part of the east coast. 😕
I had no idea emory was considered part of the east coast. 😕
.)
Hopefully there isn't a geography quiz during your interviews.
For the record, East Coast = Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Washington, DC.
Everyplace else is either south, midwest, or west.
Carry on.
anyone actually have any comments about the programs mentioned above, wherever you want to classify them geographically?
Great post...
What about Baltimore?
So what does everybody think of the MGH, BWH, JHU, Yale, Duke, UVA, Emory programs so far?
SF is Nor Cal
Redding rules.
SF is Central CA. Redding is Nor Cal
I can't wait until I'm the bicoastal Dermatopathologist!
So what does everybody think of the MGH, BWH, JHU, Yale, Duke, UVA, Emory programs so far?
yes emory isn't the one of the big harvard esq. northeast programs. But i was truly impressed with the way they run their show. Large signout rooms with giant plasmas, and awesome residents, super friendly. Yes, if you have a thing against atlanta, thing you may want to go elsewhere, but i personally thought it was a great city, great weather too actually. I've heard they just got a Hugh Jass grant and are building 2 or 3 new LARGE medical centers...many of which are actually related to us, as pathologists.
yes Amin has left, but sharon (weiss) still runs the show, with the help of andy (folpe). Parslow (the chair, once-UCSF head) is a total resident-oriented chair. I'm aware of an anecdote where the residents were having problems doing presentations b/c of a lack of an easier way to transport data/ppt's from computers/cd's etc. Parslow was made aware of this, and the next few days, every resident was given a USB memory stick [mind you: this was a while back, when they were a bit more expensive and not as predominant as they are now].
it was very high on my list, but b/c of personal situations i had to rank another pair of institutions higher. So yah, it's definetly an up-and-coming place. Two big thumbs up.
SF is straight up Nor Cal. No one in SF considers themselves Central Coast.
My informants have told me:
1.) Folpe has/will leave very soon.
2.) Sharon Weiss is retiring.
that would leave soft tissue consults squarely in the hands of Fletcher given that Kempson is out of the picture.
I loved dartmouth's program, came very close to ranking it #1 - eventually decided it was a bit too small, but that's kind of relative and open to interpretation. They had a lot of good faculty who seemed to be into teaching. Not sure - but I had heard a couple of them had left. Anyway, it was a nice interview day and it's a nice hospital. One good thing is that the chairman of the department is also the program director.
Dartmouth is cushhhhh. I would train there. I would get all preppied out in J. Crew blazers and sweaters in the winter, even slap on one those brightly colored scarves. I never worn a scarf. Dartmouth makes me think all these pathologists cuddle around a warm fire and sign out surg path while sipping cider. No idea if its true, but I imagine that...
cider is for wussies. bring on the beer!
When I think of Dartmouth pathology I get this image of really hot blonds dressed in colorful sweaters that pass around cups of hot toddy while signing out their load of 5 cases/day. Sometime around noon the path lab takes a break outside for snowball fight, then retires to the Dartmouth alum club where cigars and warmed brandy are served at happy hour.
but wow, Sharon leaving? i wonder if she will do what Kempson does and sign out consults only (which he still does by the way several months of the year, so no brady, Fletcher ain't the only dude out there).
Being a soft tissue expert is not what used to be....
Academic consults are predominantly 4-5 areas:
1. Derm, far and away the highest volume, which for my biz goes to BW
2. GI, which I send almost exclusively to Mich
3. Medical lung, which I send to Mayo Scottsdale
4. Medical kidney, which goes for me to UCSF, though I dont really care because I dont even read the H+E's on these
I have no neuropath(area #5) but would likely send that out to JHU or BW.
If you suck at Heme, it's going out as well.
On rare occasion, difficult breast lesions go out, more of liability concern tho or when they dip into atypical columnar hyperplasia-like areas.
But really that is it. Being a world expert in say pancreas, gyn, liver or soft tissues/bone for example just isnt as useful.
Yes in the pre-immuno days, soft tissue was challenging. Now you have a panel of smooth muscle markers, neural markers and the like. WHO classification scheme is easy to follow. What you are sending out is very very limited, maybe low grade chondrosarcs and odd ball fibromyxoid tumors. You can go 5 years without seeing one.
In terms of bone tumors, most big osteosarcs and their ilk go to academic centers anyway right from the biopsy stage. The time I spent learning bone tumors was truly wasted.Derm, Heme, GI or GU is 1,000x more valuable, literally.
My informants have told me:
1.) Folpe has/will leave very soon.
2.) Sharon Weiss is retiring.
that would leave soft tissue consults squarely in the hands of Fletcher given that Kempson is out of the picture.
Fletcher is the source for soft tissue. I attended one of his signouts last week and he's unreal. There was standing room only in his tiny signout area.
Since I was the new face in the room, he asked me questions and seemed interested in what I had to say. I was floored the someone of his caliber even noticed me crowded around his scope, frantically trying to keep up with the cases.
he still do SOs in the evening? I always thought that was crazy.
Or you could go to the Cleveland Clinic and do the consults either Goldblum or Rubin bring in.