Bio Passages: TPRH SW vs. TBR

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

dropper

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
106
Reaction score
3
To those who have done both TPRH SW and TBR bio passages... pros and cons, similarity to the 2012 MCAT, overall effectiveness?

Some background on my situation: Little over two weeks til D-day. All EK 30-minute exams completed, they were a joke (no score below 13), but besides those I haven't had much practice, passage/question-wise. Content knowledge is solid, only gap that needs to be filled is endocrinology which can easily be memorized and mnemonicized in one session. Going to hit practice passages HARD in a few days and the recent posts I've read (yeah you OCDOCD =p) have been indicating that the SW bio passages are more representative of the recent MCAT, at least the experimental passages.

Any thoughts or opinions would be appreciated.
 
I have just taken the real deal, taken 2/3 of the BR bio passages, did most of the EK bio, and done just under half of the TPRH SW bio (most of the advanced passages though).

The TPRH SW is the best of those 3 by far.

Do all of these passages you can. The SW has some basic knowledge and discrete type passage Qs, VR like implication Qs, lots of solid experimental Qs, and some very tough advanced passage Qs that can only be answered from passage info like on the real test. Those 87 passages will keep you more than busy over the next couple weeks.


The SN2ED schedule should really be changed to have EK or TPR bio with the TPRH SW. It is far and above the BR or EK and the limited amount of Kaplan stuff I've seen (a number of passages from their thick book). I would even go as far as saying all the EK 1001 can be tossed in favor of the SW for discrete Q replacement. The SW has 146 bio discretes, 138 o chem discretes, 92 chem discretes, and 425 physics discretes. This should be more than enough for most. I never got a chance to do any of them, but I would have saved the money spent on the EK 1001 books if I would have known (only did about 100 Qs from each 1001).
 
The SN2ED schedule should really be changed to have EK or TPR bio with the TPRH SW.

I'd be more willing to make that change if TPR sold their workbooks separate from their class. Heck, I wouldn't have recommended the verbal workbook if there was another decent verbal source due to the difficulty in getting one. Unfortunately, there are literally only two good sources for verbal (excluding the AAMC material) with the rest being pretty bad.
 
I'd be more willing to make that change if TPR sold their workbooks separate from their class. Heck, I wouldn't have recommended the verbal workbook if there was another decent verbal source due to the difficulty in getting one. Unfortunately, there are literally only two good sources for verbal (excluding the AAMC material) with the rest being pretty bad.

I realize that you're hesitant to add the TPRH SW because it is hard to get. But it is honestly MUCH better than the other materials, just like their verbal workbook is (which you have included). I would at least list it as highly recommended.

Also, the In Class Compendium has 30+ good verbal passages and a good number of the sciences too. It should be included as optional for more quality verbal practice since there is so little (it has answers with no explanations). The Official MCAT Guide is also a quality buy at $10-15 used with 20+ very representative science passages (verbal is too easy). And finally the AAMC Self Assessment is a bit spendy but an excellent optional source for a sizable volume of high quality CBT style practice.
 
I'd be more willing to make that change if TPR sold their workbooks separate from their class. Heck, I wouldn't have recommended the verbal workbook if there was another decent verbal source due to the difficulty in getting one. Unfortunately, there are literally only two good sources for verbal (excluding the AAMC material) with the rest being pretty bad.
The same problem exists with bio passages though. There are only a couple sources outside of AAMC with good bio passages: TPRH and Kaplan (EK might also have good passages, I don't know, I never did their 30 minute exams).

TBR's bio passages really aren't very good. They emphasis detail too much, and that problem is exacerbated by the fact that the details they emphasize are also the unnecessary facts that they cram into the chapters. This means that without reading the TBR chapters you're not going to do very well, and if you do read them then the passages are too easy because it's a matter of just remembering facts. Contrast this to the MCAT's bio passages which emphasize concepts and critical thinking far more than fact recall.

I think it's worth recommending the TPRH SW. You can often find it sold together with the VW, and when it is sold alone the price markup is nowhere near as insane as the VW's. Looking at ebay right now there are plenty for sale under $60 which is what TBR's bio books will cost you. Even if you bought one of the most expensive auctions ($150), that's still $150 for a book that has between 50-100 passages and 100-200 discretes each for physics, gen chem, orgo, and bio; put another way, you're paying between $15 to $37.50 for quality passages for each science if you use the whole workbook. Then consider that ordering off eBay is easier and faster than mail ordering TBR books, and I really can't see any reason to get TBR bio over TPRH SW.

Also, because I don't think this can be understated, TBR bio does not represent the real MCAT's bio passages very well. I think a lot of people prep with TBR bio and come away with the idea that the real MCAT also focuses on knowledge regurgitation. Then they take the real MCAT, find out (too late) that the real test is actually all about interpreting experimental data and applying concepts, and freak out because they weren't prepared for a test that is the exact opposite of what they practiced on. I've read many posts on this forum saying that one of TBR bio's main strengths is in preparing you for the really "out there" passages you run into on BS, but in reality the passages only seem "out there" because people were prepping with unrepresentative materials.

Anyway, I think I answered OP's question too although judging from his post I get the feeling that my opinion on this matter precedes me 😛 The only thing I want to add is that if you want to know exactly what you're in for, get the AAMC Official Guide. It's essentially $30 for roughly an FL's worth of passages, and the bio passages in it are exactly like the "monster" passages that people complain about on the real thing. That should give you an idea of what you should be looking for in your prep materials.
 
Thanks for the input Twins and OCD. I'm trying to get my hands on the SW as we speak. Got the official guide in the mail yesterday too, hopefully that + the assessment + SW will be ample practice
 
TPRH science workbook passages are great, man. The experimental ones are very representative of the bio on the real MCAT that I took last September and the passages marked "advanced" are especially good. Some questions can be answered just from reading comp but they really test your skills at interpreting experimental data, tables and graphs, as well as at using your basic bio content knowledge and applying it to new, unfamiliar situations. That is what the MCAT bio passages are like.

Edit: To others talking about the verbal workbook: Also, I cannot say enough good things about the verbal workbook. Yes, it is expensive when buying it on ebay, but it is the most similar to the AAMCs and the real MCAT. EK 101 from what I've seen from quick glances of it (I own it but haven't started it yet, will prob do one later today and report back on thoughts of it) is just not as representative of MCAT verbal as TPR is. Obviously AAMCs are the best practice for verbal but TPRH verbal workbook is the second best resource by far.

I also second what Twin said about the ICC's usefulness, although the lack of explanations is a negative.
 
Last edited:
has the princeton review science workbook changed a lot over the years? I have the 2006 version and i don't see any advanced bio passages.

EDIT: on second thought, yeah it does
 
Last edited:
Top