biochem question

[VeganSoprano]

---

Members do not see this ad.

For those who have taken a 2-semester biochem sequence, is there a significant difference in the difficulty level of the two semesters? I'm especially wondering if it's like ochem, where I did fine in the first semester but worked my butt off for a C in the second semester...

Thanks!

 

[crittergal]

I thought there was a difference in difficulty, but the exact opposite to what you described for O-chem. I worked my tail off for a B on the 1st semester. 2nd semester I was much less committed (translate: way less effort) and was able to earn an A.

I did take both halves in summer, so five weeks for each class. That may have played into the intensity. Really though, I think the perception of difficulty will vary from individual to individual.

 

[No Imagination]

It COMPLETELY depends on the course style. Some (most?) biochem I courses focus on fundamentals of protein synthesis and brute memorization of several metabolic pathways (Glycolysis, TCA, Cory, Pentose Phosphate, ect.) They tend to overwhelm the student, without providing much in the way of application or relevance, so its difficult.

Biochem II, usually revolves around more detailed aspects, like certain AA and NT synthesis and breakdown and their byproducts. Coenzymes, enzymatic mechanisms, kinetics, ect. Usually, II has more relevance for the world of biochemistry (although still may not be very clinically oriented).

I personally found II to be MUCH easier then I, but I am horrible at memorizing. I still can't name off all the enzymes in the TCA cycle - (despite learning it several times and having adv. degree in the subject).

I'd look at the syllabus and decide for yourself.

 

[crittergal]

^^^ sounds about like my course. The 2nd half actually required thought whereas the 1st was pretty much memorize and regurg