- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
- Messages
- 66
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey all,
I've been hearing a lot of chatter out there about the April 2005 exam from people I know personally and on other discussion boards. A lot of people seem to believe that this last exam was considerably more difficult than previous administrations. I've been told that the April 2005 verbal was unruly difficult and that the physical sciences wasn't much better. Additionally, a lot of test takers on an AAMC discussion board seem to think that the AAMC practice exams were much easier and were a poor representation of the real thing. However, I have not picked up on this sentiment amongst SDNers. What did you guys think? How did the real thing compare to the 3R - 8 AAMC exams? I just finished the AAMC 5R exam and scored 12 9 12, should I be concerned my real score may not correlate with these exams? Your input is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
a fellow paranoid Pre-med
P.S. if there are other threads on this topic, my apologies. feel free to throw in a link.
I've been hearing a lot of chatter out there about the April 2005 exam from people I know personally and on other discussion boards. A lot of people seem to believe that this last exam was considerably more difficult than previous administrations. I've been told that the April 2005 verbal was unruly difficult and that the physical sciences wasn't much better. Additionally, a lot of test takers on an AAMC discussion board seem to think that the AAMC practice exams were much easier and were a poor representation of the real thing. However, I have not picked up on this sentiment amongst SDNers. What did you guys think? How did the real thing compare to the 3R - 8 AAMC exams? I just finished the AAMC 5R exam and scored 12 9 12, should I be concerned my real score may not correlate with these exams? Your input is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
a fellow paranoid Pre-med
P.S. if there are other threads on this topic, my apologies. feel free to throw in a link.