- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,805
- Reaction score
- 2,487
Hey guys, just needed a little clarification.
25.Not correcting for wind resistance when evaluating the results of the experiment would lead to a value for the gravitational force constant that is too:
A. large. The standard deviation in the raw data would be affected by the presence of wind resistance.
B. large. The standard deviation in the raw data would not be affected by the presence of wind resistance.
C. small. The standard deviation in the raw data would be affected by the presence of wind resistance.
D. small. The standard deviation in the raw data would not be affected by the presence of wind resistance.
The answer is D , and the explanation is:
Wind resistance opposes the direction of the motion (it always opposes the velocity of a moving object). This means that there is an upward force on the ball as it undergoes free fall, resulting in a reduced overall downward force. The time it would take for the ball to fall is increased because of wind resistance leading to lower calculated value for the acceleration, so the value of g would be underestimated if you failed to correct for wind resistance. This eliminates choices A and B. The effect of wind resistance would be uniform across the data, because it increases as velocity increases. This means that no variation in the standard deviation should be observed beyond that of human error, so rule out choice C in favor of choice D. The best answer is choice D.
What is confusing me about this question is that I would assume without calculating wind resistance, the gravitational force would be OVERESTIMATED because wind resistance opposes gravity. So it would be LARGE.
Thanks a lot in advance!
25.Not correcting for wind resistance when evaluating the results of the experiment would lead to a value for the gravitational force constant that is too:
A. large. The standard deviation in the raw data would be affected by the presence of wind resistance.
B. large. The standard deviation in the raw data would not be affected by the presence of wind resistance.
C. small. The standard deviation in the raw data would be affected by the presence of wind resistance.
D. small. The standard deviation in the raw data would not be affected by the presence of wind resistance.
The answer is D , and the explanation is:
Wind resistance opposes the direction of the motion (it always opposes the velocity of a moving object). This means that there is an upward force on the ball as it undergoes free fall, resulting in a reduced overall downward force. The time it would take for the ball to fall is increased because of wind resistance leading to lower calculated value for the acceleration, so the value of g would be underestimated if you failed to correct for wind resistance. This eliminates choices A and B. The effect of wind resistance would be uniform across the data, because it increases as velocity increases. This means that no variation in the standard deviation should be observed beyond that of human error, so rule out choice C in favor of choice D. The best answer is choice D.
What is confusing me about this question is that I would assume without calculating wind resistance, the gravitational force would be OVERESTIMATED because wind resistance opposes gravity. So it would be LARGE.
Thanks a lot in advance!