Breast: one and done

Started by scarbrtj
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
This goes back to one of my prior comments, rad oncs hurt each other in the worst ways just to gain on an independent level.

I also like the term “radiotherapist”
In tumor board if a surgeon refers to us as "radiotherapists," I make sure to use "surgerize" in a sentence somehow. It's a word that seems to really make them strangely mad. Kind of like Uncle Buck's hat.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Maybe zero and done? And ageism?

"Rad oncs": ~9% local control benefit with RT (p<0.0001), but no OS benefit, in older breast patients... ∴ RT not nec. standard of care
(Also rad oncs: ~2.5% local control benefit with ENI RT (p=0.024), but no OS benefit... ∴ ENI RT is standard of care.)

SABCS 2020: Radiotherapy Omission After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Older Patients With HR-Positive Breast Cancer
And this is exactly why I almost never treat uninvolved IMNs routinely. Doing so would make me a hypocrite.