BRS Path + Robbins Review Questions

[cmycburkitt]

---

Members don't see this ad.

If I read BRS Path and did Robbins Review of Pathology questions, would it be enough for path on the boards? Is it absolutely essential that I still do Goljan's Rapid Review?

 

[Iwy Em Hotep]

I'm doing this right now, and I think it's plenty of path.

However, the advantage of Goljan isn't that there's more path, it's that it's more integrative with other subjects.

 

[Hernandez]

If I read BRS Path and did Robbins Review of Pathology questions, would it be enough for path on the boards? Is it absolutely essential that I still do Goljan's Rapid Review?

No, I don't think you'll need Goljan's book if you're already using BRS, both are excellent sources. I would still possibly consider another question book source, whether it is NMS questions, qbank, or webpath. Having different styles of questions for the same material by different people, I feel, is important to make sure you know the material, not just the question style of the author.

 

[allendo]

No, I don't think you'll need Goljan's book if you're already using BRS, both are excellent sources. I would still possibly consider another question book source, whether it is NMS questions, qbank, or webpath. Having different styles of questions for the same material by different people, I feel, is important to make sure you know the material, not just the question style of the author.

What are NMS questions?

 

[Hernandez]

click pic