- Joined
- Feb 26, 2003
- Messages
- 8,860
- Reaction score
- 3,421
If it is proven that he knew cutting hours to the bare bone would harm patients, can he be prosecuted?
Theoretically, it would be the company that could be charged with a felony, if a felony did occur. The closest recent case I can think of is United States vs. Pacific Gas & Electric (2007) but there was a clear federal statute that was violated.
In that case, the company was charged, convicted, and fined (since it can’t go to jail).
Executive officers are usually immune from prosecution unless there was malfeasance involved (financial fraud, etc...)
Cutting hours at the top that may eventually result in harm down the road is probably too far disconnected from the criminal act of negligent homicide or manslaughter.
Under strict liability, though, CVS would easily be found liable in civil court.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN
Criminally - where is the law?
Civilly - anything goes..
This is a load of crap. This is why I regret going into pharmacy and I haven’t even graduated yetHis criminal defense lawyer could just place the blame on individual pharmacists and PICs to clear him from the high burden of proof needed to prosecute him for criminal charges.
Civil suits, on the other hands, would be far more likely to succeed.
Corporate "politics" are in every industry. It's even worse in professions like law and finance. In corporate law and investment banking, working 80-100 hour weeks is a pretty frequent occurrence. And lets not even speak about the politics that go on in those professions.