- Joined
- Oct 17, 2005
- Messages
- 2,538
- Reaction score
- 8
What if the MS 4 had that experience vs a new pa grad that did too? We can play these games forever. MS4 wins, everytime. I don't think the stereotypical pa nowadays is someone with tons of experience, anyway...Times have changed on that.
Even with the experience, you can't assume they are better with patients nor ahead in medical knowledge than a 26 year old M.S. 4. Everything is a case by case basis. I've worked with ARNP's with "20 years experience" who didn't have the clinical knowledge nor patient skills of a mature MS-3.
Even with the experience, you can't assume they are better with patients nor ahead in medical knowledge than a 26 year old M.S. 4. Everything is a case by case basis. I've worked with ARNP's with "20 years experience" who didn't have the clinical knowledge nor patient skills of a mature MS-3.
what if the new grad pa had been an icu nurse/paramedic/r.t. for 15 yrs before pa school....they might have learned just a few clinical skills during that time and have a good idea about how to interact with pts, better I would say than someone who had not even started their residency.....
the traditional pa school applicant is already a seasoned medical professional. if we are talking about the new wave of 22 yr old bio majors without any medical experience going to pa school then you are right, the ms4 should win every time.