- Joined
- Feb 4, 2006
- Messages
- 156
- Reaction score
- 0
I was trying to study for step 2 when I came across a question asking about access in hemodynamically unstable 3yo (likely septic) girl that needed quick access after peripheral attempts failed. The question asked how it should be done in the ED. I choose intraosseus (correct answer)...but other options included femoral line and subclavian. These seemed reasonable to me also.
The answer key says, yes, IO is best. However, it then goes on to say "central line access in children should only be done by highly-skilled individuals, and is therefore not reccommneded in the ED."
After ignoring the implication that individuals in the ED are not highly skilled enough, I began to wonder how often central lines are stuck in kids in the ED. Do you guys do them?
My critical peds EM exposure is minimal (I guessed IO above mostly because of adverts in EM journals!), but central IV access doesn't seem that out of the question to me.
Please tell me what it is like in the real world. Thanks, ncc
The answer key says, yes, IO is best. However, it then goes on to say "central line access in children should only be done by highly-skilled individuals, and is therefore not reccommneded in the ED."
After ignoring the implication that individuals in the ED are not highly skilled enough, I began to wonder how often central lines are stuck in kids in the ED. Do you guys do them?
My critical peds EM exposure is minimal (I guessed IO above mostly because of adverts in EM journals!), but central IV access doesn't seem that out of the question to me.
Please tell me what it is like in the real world. Thanks, ncc