I would like to share my perspective and experiences regarding cheating on tests that are significant to pre-health professionals. The profs and the TAs do not care in the least. It does not affect any of the issues that impact their immediate future.
Let me share my background and a few experiences. I am currently MS0 and will be entering med school in August. Previously, I spent five years obtaining a PhD in chemistry at a large mid-western state school. My focus was on organic synthetic methods.
Over the course of being a TA for two years, I caught a small number of people obviously consulting the tests of other students next to them in both organic chemistry one and two. At the end of the test, I collected the papers, marked the cheaters papers and the papers of the people who had been intruded upon. When I called this to the attention of the professor leading the class, he completely ignored the whole situation. The reason for this behavior is now obvious to me. The professor could not care less about the class or about teaching in general. His focus was on obtaining grants from third party organizations (NIH, Petroleum Research Fund of ACS, etc.) which support the entire department through overhead charges to the grants (usually 40 to 50 %), pushing his graduate students to work harder to generate additional publishable results, publishing papers and obtaining tenure. Teaching was just a means to support himself until he had locked in that lifetime job. The instruction process at the undergraduate level meant nothing to him and as I came to understand my role as a graduate student, it came to mean nothing to me. At the graduate level, teaching a class is just a means of recruiting new graduate students (cheap expendable publication generating labor) to your lab. My role was to focus on my research and pump out material for my professor to publish so he would look good in the academic community and I could get my degree and find a job that actually paid a real wage. Teaching had a place so low on the priority scale it could not even be located.
I encountered a similar situation involving cheating during my undergraduate studies. People were cheating without any attempt to conceal it on the calculus one final. I reported it to the department chairman who took no action of any kind. He could not have cared less since it did not impact issues like grants, tenure decisions, quantity of publications generated by new and tenured faculty, who got which office, who obtained access to scarce resources, budgets, hiring new faculty, managing diversity problems and faculty promotions. These are the issues that matter in academic departments.
Cheaters will always exist and little will be done about it. That is in part why the MCAT matters so much in med school admissions. It is one of the very few standardized means of comparing people that is resistant to cheating. In your application package, it probably represents the single most important issue in your package presented to medical schools in determining who progresses to the interview stage of the application process.
My advice is work hard, master the material in all of the prerequisites, review for the test using the method most suited to your learning style, crush and humiliate the MCAT and ignore the cheaters who fail to learn the material. Despite being far removed in time from both my undergraduate and graduate degrees, my ability to hit the review books alone and perform on the MCAT made the difference in my application. As an undergraduate I took on too much by double majoring in both biology and chemistry. As a result my undergraduate GPA was only 3.45 which is OK, but in the area of med school applicants, nothing special. The MCAT score made the difference.
