It’s tuition in comparison to other schools in the Chicago area appears cheaper, but the truth is that you may end up overpaying for school, staying longer in school, or not even graduating when you have over $100,000 in student loans. The school has a low endowment fund in comparison to other universities, so tuition and the state government are their main sources of revenue. With the current Illinois government budget deficit, the school will keep a competitive apparent tuition to attract new students, fail more students, so they can remediate and make more money off them. CSU-COP is a trauma-laden site. Most of the good professors have left for other schools. In the first year, they will woo you like a new love; even call you to register for classes.
As time goes on, it dwindles to a “
no- concern” status. The third year is where they introduce core open-ended question classes that happen to be electives in other schools. No wonder, the NAPLEX Pass rate for the school has decreased (The NAPLEX gives some focus to compounding which the CSU-COP doesn’t lay emphasis on). These are their supposed
gold standard and rate-limiting classes. At this point, likability and emotional grading are utilized since it is at the professor’s discretion and no specific point-by-point allocation is stated in the grade scheme for the exams (2 Exams: 50% to 55% of the total grade). New terms such as
“regrade” are introduced into the syllabus with clauses that
inhibit the freedom of expression of students on stating the points that they think they deserve. They also introduce the
“scare-factor” by stating that people who request for a regrade are likely to score lower than their original score. There is the saying that, if someone does not want you to express yourself, he is not you friend. Well then, the school is not your friend; “Your success is our purpose” turns into “Your pocket is our purpose.” Even reviewing your own exam becomes a battle where some students are screamed at. Sad! Evasive techniques will be utilized to avoid giving some targeted students points they deserve (ethnicity and what you do for the school play a role in who is targeted). Consequently, one may end up having to sit out for a year or more when one should not have failed the class in the first place. The general pattern is that they give these students grades such as 69.9% so they feel they were so close to a pass, so when they retake it the next time they will pass.
This is called the borderline phenomenon. Since one is in so much debt and has invested so much time, they just naturally suck it up. Regrades and grievances may be ignored, delayed or intercepted based on who you are (following protocol has nothing to do with it). Appeals are a waste of printer ink. One is better off not filling out the end of semester course evaluations. Retention of their faculty is their main aim so faculty can do whatever they want. Technological issues are also a staple.
The P4 year has an extra module that the other schools don’t have. Additionally, there are some bad sites interspersed in there meant to trip students. It’s all about the money-making and less about the students!
Everyone goes into a new endeavor with a positive mindset, but what if these experiences happen to you. No one deserves to be treated like this. Observers are worried and people are not stupid!
Don’t listen to those tour guides and students who during the interview process only say positive things about the school. They have a “back-end royalty” for their loyalty. You are precious and your time and money (even if it is in loans) are precious. Choose wisely!