- Joined
- Jan 4, 2007
- Messages
- 57
- Reaction score
- 0
anybody ever consider to be a Dc instead of Do?
ohh crap...
*popcorn-check, soda-check*
ohh crap...
*popcorn-check, soda-check*
im not a future dc or anything but i believe that Dc's have more on hand experience than do's when it comes to quacking backs.i dont even think that Do's quack backs. Do's definetely have good educational foundations for medicine. but Dc's are more physical. dc's are like Physical therapist's.anyone can be a chiropractor.
chiropractors are DO-rejects.
chiropractors are lazy $$ sucking geniuses.
chiropractors arent docs, just wannabees.
chiropractors are real good with their hands, but not like DOs.
heh, way to kick things off
anyone can be a chiropractor.
chiropractors are DO-rejects.
chiropractors are lazy $$ sucking geniuses.
chiropractors arent docs, just wannabees.
chiropractors are real good with their hands, but not like DOs.
heh, way to kick things off
anybody ever consider to be a Dc instead of Do?
yesssssssssssssssssss!anyone can be a chiropractor.
chiropractors are DO-rejects.
chiropractors are lazy $$ sucking geniuses.
chiropractors arent docs, just wannabees.
chiropractors are real good with their hands, but not like DOs.
heh, way to kick things off
There is a DC and at least one person who did part of chiropractic school in my class, so the answer to your question is yes, apparently people have considered it.anybody ever consider to be a Dc instead of Do?
There is a DC and at least one person who did part of chiropractic school in my class, so the answer to your question is yes, apparently people have considered it.
I actually did. In fact I was planning on going to chiropractic school until about a year and a half ago. My parents moved to a new city and their neighbor happened to be a DO, and it also happens that he went to chiropractic school. I had lunch with him and he explained what Ostepathic medicine was, and why he chose his career path. From that point on I knew I wanted to go to med school.
Chiropractors are great at what they do. They have one modality to treat certain ailments, and as long as they stick to what they know best, I think they do a lot of good. It's when they try to use that modality to treat problems that are out of their level of training that problems arise.
Do is a much better field. it's not as limited as a Dc.
anyone can be a chiropractor.
chiropractors are DO-rejects.
chiropractors are lazy $$ sucking geniuses.
chiropractors arent docs, just wannabees.
chiropractors are real good with their hands, but not like DOs.
heh, way to kick things off
anybody ever consider to be a Dc instead of Do?
I think this isnt appropriate.....You know a lot of MDs and lay people think the same things about DOs........."those fake doctors" (references to DOs) -I ve heard this many times.
To the poster, they are two completely different fields. From what I understand DOs dont crack backs that much.
Dr.Inviz you certainly know how to set things on fire
I think we should start the gorilla thread again if this one doesn't show much success
DO's are Dc's...there is no difference. You should read the sticky about how the scope of DO practice only permits them to crack backs and perscribe only "ColdMD" and "Head-ON."
Bashing any profession on these forums is against our TOS policy so keep it civil please.. A search would have yielded many threads on this.
I believe you are trying to compare apples and oranges... or maybe apples and light sabers or something.
DOs are physicians and surgeons who have added training in OMM which isn't the same as what Chiros do at all. This is the same as asking if anyone considered being a space ninja before medicine which obviously many of us did before our dreams were shattered and we settled for being docs.
DOs are physicians and surgeons who have added training in OMM which isn't the same as what Chiros do at all. This is the same as asking if anyone considered being a space ninja before medicine which obviously many of us did before our dreams were shattered and we settled for being docs.
thank you dr invizibleyou suck dude, honestly.
hit up your bro familyties for the differences ... hes THE OP
why thank you babe
I use to go to a DC many years ago. His office was connected to a Gym, and he got quite a few of his patients from the gym. The best thing was he got to always work out, and he was banging the hottest trainer at the gym
He is a lucky guy.
So I guess he had that going for him, becoming a DC instead of a DO.
im not a future dc or anything but i believe that Dc's have more on hand experience than do's when it comes to quacking backs.
Why yes, yes, they do.
(oh, and no.)
A Dc's specialty is based on adjustments Do's dont do adjustments.
Chuck Norris may cause pain but DOs can manipulate Chuck Norris ...
Dcs wish they could touch Chuck Norris, Chuck Norris roundhouse kicks Dcs so hard he gives them a quack.
jackie chan can kick chuck norris's arse
They were paying him $50/hr for PT and that didn't even include the clients he had on the side ... and just to mention he picked up a lot of patients at the gym.
$50/hr is less than PA's make starting out in my state. I wouldn't consider a DC degree to be a good investment if this is typical compensation. I'd think that you could bill private insurance at a much better rate than this (for those who have insurance that covers the therapy).
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't all chiropractic schools private (and very expensive)?
$50/hr is less than PA's make starting out in my state. I wouldn't consider a DC degree to be a good investment if this is typical compensation. I'd think that you could bill private insurance at a much better rate than this (for those who have insurance that covers the therapy).
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't all chiropractic schools private (and very expensive)?
$50/hr is less than PA's make starting out in my state. I wouldn't consider a DC degree to be a good investment if this is typical compensation. I'd think that you could bill private insurance at a much better rate than this (for those who have insurance that covers the therapy).
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't all chiropractic schools private (and very expensive)?
all DO schools except TCOM are private and very expensive too.
when i wrote PT i mean Personal Trainer not physicsl therapist
Trainers make normally like half of that. He was just working few days a week as a PT at the gym where i worked.
Sorry about that. Trainers at my hospital's gym get something like $14/hour, and that's only if they have a degree.
$50/hr is less than PA's make starting out in my state. I wouldn't consider a DC degree to be a good investment if this is typical compensation. I'd think that you could bill private insurance at a much better rate than this (for those who have insurance that covers the therapy).
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't all chiropractic schools private (and very expensive)?
i guess it depends on the gym. I was on $23/hr but then you kinda have to get your own clients since you got payed for only training sessions that ppl buy...if you were just hunging out and helping new members it was more like $7/hr.
all DO schools except TCOM are private and very expensive too.
Comparing DO and DC degrees is impossible.You might as well compare DO degrees with Cosmetology.
There's a reason why chiropractors are not allowed to prescribe medication or perform any surgery and it's not due to "natural" healthcare philosophy - it's a result of competence and education.
I've practiced for 20 years (Board Certified in Family Practice) - chiropractors are almost universally seen as bumbling back and body crackers who are basically harmless when treating patients who have 1) limited intelligence or understanding of medicine and 2) will get better anyway after whatever it is goes away on its own.
Too many chiropractors have limited skills in differential diagnosis and a rudimentary knowledge of pharmacology - I'm not sure what role they play in health care aside from overbilling.
Besides, the basic chiropractic philosophy is flawed - I don't care how many times you put Mary Lou "back in alignment" it still won't cure Mary Lou's gonorrhea. I used to have patients bring me lab reports from studies their chiropractors would order because the chiros couldn't interpret the results.
If your mom had diabetes would you tell her to stop the insulin and get a couple of "lumbar rolls?"
Seriously, even though chiropractic makes virtually no sense now, it was probably acceptable in 1895. It's been downhill from there. Chiropractors offer a simple explanation for complex problems ("...your headaches are because this vertebra is misaligned - I'll fix that" ...CRACK! CRUNCH!).
If you took your car in to be fixed and the mechanic said, "Bring your car back three times a week for the next 4 months and then it should be okay" your inclination would be to think the mechanic was incompetent. It's not the greatest analogy but it makes the point.
Granted, some chiropractors spare patients from medical errors, toxic drugs, or an over-aggressive health care system but all things being equal the profession should probably be shut down. If all the chiropractors suddenly disappeared tomorrow what real harm would befall the American public? I know that sounds harsh but in the final analysis my advice would be to avoid DC schools like the plague, which chiropractors can't treat anyway.
While I was taught osteopathic manipulation (which is in many ways different than chiropractic manipulation) I don't have to use it if I don't consider it clinically helpful. Chiropractors have no choice. Then again, they probably don't know other choices exist.