- Joined
- Mar 31, 2003
- Messages
- 6,512
- Reaction score
- 8
for you.
In talking with countless residents in different specialties at different hospitals, it seems that people's motivations for choosing particular programs can be divided into 3 general categories.
1. Location. These people didn't care what program they got into, just as long as it was in a particular city, state, or region.
2. Reputation. These people didn't care about anything but how prestigious their program seemed.
3. Little bit of everything. These people looked at the entire picture - location, reputation, caseload, pathology, facilities, etc. This is how you would expect most people to make their decisions. However, I was surprised to see a relatively equal split among the three categories.
The reason I bring this up is because now that I am starting to research different programs, I see my philosophy changing. I used to be in category 3, tending to look at all the in-and-outs of a program. But lately, I've shifted more towards category 1, where location outweighs everything else. This philosophy is based on the premise that all the programs have to pass a certification process, so the minimum training requirements will be attained at any program. In addition, matching into the specialty of your choice is the ultimate goal, and everything after that is a bonus.
So where do you fit in?
And if you fall into category 1, what were your primary motivations for making location the most important determinant? Examples include: family and friends in the area, weather, always wanted to live in a particular city, significant other, etc.
In talking with countless residents in different specialties at different hospitals, it seems that people's motivations for choosing particular programs can be divided into 3 general categories.
1. Location. These people didn't care what program they got into, just as long as it was in a particular city, state, or region.
2. Reputation. These people didn't care about anything but how prestigious their program seemed.
3. Little bit of everything. These people looked at the entire picture - location, reputation, caseload, pathology, facilities, etc. This is how you would expect most people to make their decisions. However, I was surprised to see a relatively equal split among the three categories.
The reason I bring this up is because now that I am starting to research different programs, I see my philosophy changing. I used to be in category 3, tending to look at all the in-and-outs of a program. But lately, I've shifted more towards category 1, where location outweighs everything else. This philosophy is based on the premise that all the programs have to pass a certification process, so the minimum training requirements will be attained at any program. In addition, matching into the specialty of your choice is the ultimate goal, and everything after that is a bonus.
So where do you fit in?
And if you fall into category 1, what were your primary motivations for making location the most important determinant? Examples include: family and friends in the area, weather, always wanted to live in a particular city, significant other, etc.