CHOP vs. Boston

Started by jowell
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

I liked CHOP much better...they seemed slighly more relaxed and the faculty more supportive of their residents. Boston, while nice, seemed to rest upon their laurels a touch more: less support. They aren't even in my Top 5. Just MHO.
 
Well, this isn't the best post I can give you, but I'm going to be a fellow at CHOP in 2006, and I interviewed at both places. Now, I didn't interview at either for residency, but I think Boston is a cooler town, but more expensive, while CHOP seemed to be a bit more of a complete hospital. Plus you only rotate through CHOP, where Boston requires you go to several hospitals. I think that would favor CHOP. Reputation-wise it's a wash, so that shouldn't matter. I think it's mostly how YOU felt about the two places, and where you could stand living for 3 years (and potentially more, as if you meet someone/or already have a family, it can be tough to move).

Feel free to PM me if you'd like. I hope that helped a little.
 
Kawasaki said:
I liked CHOP much better...they seemed slighly more relaxed and the faculty more supportive of their residents. Boston, while nice, seemed to rest upon their laurels a touch more: less support. They aren't even in my Top 5. Just MHO.

I second this, especially the part about Boston. Too bad, since I think it would be more fun (albeit expensive) to live in Boston.