- Joined
- Nov 23, 2007
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
I graduated from Seattle Pacific University and I highly recommend it. I am now licensed! SPU has a great reputation in the Seattle area...
Thanks 73BARMYPgsp,
I added it to my list. I think I initially took it off because of the requirement of pursuing a masters degree separately and I would prefer to go straight for the Psy.D. or Ph.D.
Anyone have thoughts on programs like that, where you need to get your Masters first and then pursue your doctoral studies?
Hey,
I hope I'm not misunderstanding what's being discussed here... but what is the point of studying psychology with a theological component?
I also assume than any religious based university has loftier goals of training professionals who will eventually do work with or for people, organizations, and institutes of that religion.
Some people may be specifally interested in studying clinical needs/ issues in a specific religious population.
I'm not sure that the goal of working primarily with people of a specific religion is a "loftier goal". I think that it's a kind of lower ethnocentric goal.
Hey, I don't know a lot about psychology, so this may be a dumb question, but is there such a thing as a treatment modality that is only effective with one specific religious population? That seems to be pretty implausible to me. Why would belonging to a certain religion factor into the kind of treatment you get?
I'm actually on board with the "chemistry and religion" analogy as well.
so am i...though i want to note that i consider science a form of religion, insofar as there is a certain belief in types of/ways to truth. and while truths can be proven using this method, this method can never really be tested using its own measures.
that coming from someone who sometimes believes in postmodernism. (and i'm definitely not religious, by any means)
One can try to explain anything but does it make sense? Not necessarily. There is though, no science in religion, since it is a belief; there is only a scientific method that can try to examine if religious figures did exist. It is the old and never tiring question which is begged by Agnostics and Believers:" If billions of people believe in it, it can't be wrong, can it?"!
This would be a circular argument and therefore unsound.
There is additionally a dangerous path, or slippery slope you are suggesting, since part of your statement could be utilized to push the idea of having Creationism taught in classrooms, which I would see as an evolutionary step back into the past (approximately 500 - 600 years).
Belief is Belief and Science is Proof !!
So I don't really see having a religious aspect to being a practicing psychologist as an infringement on the science, but rather meeting clients where they are in terms of their belief systems.
I think that's a fair assessment - I just think it can be a fine line and some schools push it too far (see Regent University mission statement for an example). In their case, I think its highly inappropriate that they be labeled a clinical psychology program and accredited as such since their goals seem to be completely at odds with evidence-based practice. Note that I'm not saying that they shouldn't exist, just that the way their mission statement is worded - they do not sound like they are training clinical psychologists. Its important for clinicians to have religious sensitivity, be open to discussing it, recognize the important role that religion may have and not be dismissive of beliefs even when they may be causing a problem, etc.
So, testing science means actually providing evidence !😉
Cosmo, that makes sense. I think it's important to recognize patients' beliefs and integrate them in therapy. I'm mostly referring to psychologists' belief systems in my previous posts.
have you guys heard of terror management theory?
well, it can easily be attributed to religion. i feel like it explains a great deal as to why people cling to their respective faiths.
i just thought i'd bring it up given the topic of conversation that the thread developed into. and, you know, it's a psychological theory, so it's appropriate.
don't mind me. i'm an atheist.
i'm assuming you're referring to me, but i don't see how anything i said was offensive. other behaviors can be explained through the use of psychological theories. i don't think religious beliefs should be exempt from having that potential.
The point of intersection between science and religion can be found in the fact that a Christian can use empirical science and value knowledge gained through methodological reduction. The point of divergence can be found in the difference between methodological reduction and ontological reduction. Ontological reduction goes beyond the methodology of reduction to say that what is found through reduction is "all there is" in terms of ultimate reality (compare to Carl Sagan's opening line in his Cosmos documentary).
I think its easy to get lost in the "science vs religion" dichotomy because it does require some hard thought to work through on a personal level. Personally, I value both science and religion and find joy in the way that they influence and inform each other. Its my belief that I owe it to those I work with to have an ongoing awareness of my values, which has made me able to work with both "religious" and "non-religious" patients effectively.
I am a Baylor student and highly recommend the program. Almost all of our tuition is paid and we receive a monthly stipend. The practicum sites are well-organized and offer many hours of therapy experience (3000 hours before internship), and research opportunities are diverse and well-organized. I interviewed and was accepted at many of the other schools you mentioned. I liked Fuller and George Fox the best, but the size of the classes and the costs were very prohibitive. Baylor usually only accepts six students a year, so the atmosphere is like family and the professors are available. I was accepted to several PHD programs as well (Washington University, Miami University, etc...) with excellent funding but really fell for Baylor at the interview. If you have more questions PM me.