- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 3,185
- Reaction score
- 5
The only school I've interviewed that is straight up PBL is Mercer. I didn't really like it there for various reasons but they all were very enthused about the method. I don't actually care very much...most of my science classes are lectures and we have SI which is kind of like PBL....so I guess I will make it work for me wherever I go. lolI'll be honest with you: I feel like at least at Baylor, the "happy medium" between lecture and PBL is used almost exclusively as a marketing ploy to pre-meds who like the idea of PBL. In practice, I get a lot of good experience talking to the doc who runs our weekly PBL sessions, but I don't feel we get a whole lot out of the sessions themslves; our presentations and working out of the cases are usually somewhat harried and secondary to our doc just talking to us about his stories as a doctor. Some groups will get more in-depth, but the vast majority, it's something we all just do because it's required and we don't get much out of it.
That's just how it is at my school, and I'm also probably biased because it's just not a way of learning that works for me. From what I've heard, some people think that PBL is really only effective if it's used as the primary teaching strategy at the school; if it's just something sort of tacked on top of everything else, it's not so useful, or so I've heard and seen at least at my school. Maybe it's better at some other schools that try and find a happy medium, but one question I'd definitely ask at schools that try and have a little of both is ask the students there what they think of their PBL sessions and whether they think they're helpful or not.